Crossmodal interaction between the mental number line and peripersonal haptic space representation in sighted and blind individuals

Humans tend to represent numbers in the form of a mental number line. Here we show that the mental number line can modulate the representation of peripersonal haptic space in a crossmodal fashion and that this interaction is not visually mediated. Sighted and early-blind participants were asked to haptically explore rods of different lengths and to indicate midpoints of those rods. During each trial, either a small (2) or a large (8) number was presented in the auditory modality. When no numbers were presented, participants tended to bisect the rods to the left of the actual midpoint, consistent with the notion of pseudoneglect. In both groups, this bias was significantly increased by the presentation of a small number and was significantly reduced by the presentation of a large number. Hence, spatial shifts of attention induced by number processing are not limited to visual space or embodied responses but extend to haptic peripersonal space and occur crossmodally without requiring the activation of a visuospatial representation.

[1]  M. McCourt,et al.  Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Wim Gevers,et al.  Look, no hands: A perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  The middle range of the number line orients attention to the left side of visual space , 2009, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[4]  C. Spence,et al.  Spatial coordinate systems for tactile spatial attention depend on developmental vision: evidence from event‐related potentials in sighted and congenitally blind adult humans , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[5]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[6]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Modulation of hemispatial neglect by directional and numerical cues in the line bisection task , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  On the Cognitive Link between Space and Number: A Meta-Analysis of the SNARC Effect , 2008 .

[8]  H. Buchtel,et al.  Tactile rod bisection: Hemispheric activation and sex differences , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Yves Rossetti,et al.  Implicit Short-Lived Motor Representations of Space in Brain Damaged and Healthy Subjects , 1998, Consciousness and Cognition.

[10]  K. Willmes,et al.  The universal SNARC effect: the association between number magnitude and space is amodal. , 2005, Experimental psychology.

[11]  David Travieso,et al.  Assessing subclinical tactual deficits in the hand function of diabetic blind persons at risk for peripheral neuropathy. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Albert Postma,et al.  Delay improves performance on a haptic spatial matching task , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  C. Spence,et al.  Early Vision Impairs Tactile Perception in the Blind , 2004, Current Biology.

[14]  G. Vallar.  Extrapersonal Visual Unilateral Spatial Neglect and Its Neuroanatomy , 2001, NeuroImage.

[15]  M. Mesulam.  Principles of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology , 2000 .

[16]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  Crossed Hands and the Snarc Effect: Afailure to Replicate Dehaene, Bossini and Giraux (1993) , 2006, Cortex.

[17]  F. Rösler,et al.  Early visual deprivation impairs multisensory interactions in humans , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  Marijn E. Struiksma,et al.  What is the link between language and spatial images? Behavioral and neural findings in blind and sighted individuals. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[20]  A. Kappers,et al.  Haptic orientation perception benefits from visual experience: Evidence from early-blind, late-blind, and sighted people , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Howard S. Kirsnher.  Principles of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology, 2nd Ed. , 2002 .

[22]  Masami Ishihara,et al.  Touch perception reveals the dominance of spatial over digital representation of numbers , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The spatial representation of numbers: evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s will , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  J. M. Park,et al.  Influence of final search direction on tactile line bisection in normal subjects , 2002, Neurology.

[26]  Mark E. McCourt,et al.  Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulusmodulation of pseudoneglect , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Number processing induces spatial performance biases , 2001, Neurology.

[28]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Xavier Seron,et al.  Semantic numerical representation in blind subjects: The role of vision in the spatial format of the mental number line , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  Giuseppe Vallar,et al.  Numbers and space: a cognitive illusion? , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The number line effect reflects top-down control , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  C. Spence,et al.  Developmental vision determines the reference frame for the multisensory control of action , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  Valéria Csépe,et al.  The parietal distance effect appears in both the congenitally blind and matched sighted controls in an acoustic number comparison task , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[35]  Luigi Trojano,et al.  Numbers are represented in egocentric space: Effects of numerical cues and spatial reference frames on hand laterality judgements , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[36]  M. Lassonde,et al.  Cross-modal plasticity for the spatial processing of sounds in visually deprived subjects , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  Yves Rossetti,et al.  Effects of Visual Deprivation on Space Representation: Immediate and Delayed Pointing toward Memorised Proprioceptive Targets , 2006, Perception.

[38]  K. Heilman,et al.  Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task , 1980, Neuropsychologia.