Refined modeling of sensor reliability in the belief function framework using contextual discounting

In belief functions theory, the discounting operation allows to combine information provided by a source in the form of a belief function with meta-knowledge regarding the reliability of that source, resulting in a ''weakened'', less informative belief function. In this article, an extension of the discounting operation is proposed, allowing to use more detailed information regarding the reliability of the source in different contexts, i.e., conditionally on different hypotheses regarding the variable on interest. This results in a contextual discounting operation parameterized with a discount rate vector. Some properties of this contextual discounting operation are studied, and its relationship with classical discounting is explained. A method for learning the discount rates is also presented.

[1]  Thierry Denoeux,et al.  Contextual Discounting of Belief Functions , 2005, ECSQARU.

[2]  Jürg Kohlas,et al.  Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems , 2000 .

[3]  Hakil Kim,et al.  Evidential reasoning approach to multisource-data classification in remote sensing , 1995, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[4]  P. Smets,et al.  Assessing sensor reliability for multisensor data fusion within the transferable belief model , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[5]  D. Dubois,et al.  A set-theoretic view of belief functions: Logical operations and approximations by fuzzy sets , 1986 .

[6]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping , 1967, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[7]  Philippe Smets,et al.  What is Dempster-Shafer's model? , 1994 .

[8]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[9]  Alain Appriou,et al.  Uncertain Data Aggregation in Classification and Tracking Processes , 1998 .

[10]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  Introduction of neighborhood information in evidence theory and application to data fusion of radar and optical images with partial cloud cover , 1998, Pattern Recognit..

[11]  P. Smets.  Data fusion in the transferable belief model , 2000, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Fusion.

[12]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  Aggregation and Fusion of Imperfect Information , 2001 .

[13]  Philippe Smets,et al.  Belief functions: The disjunctive rule of combination and the generalized Bayesian theorem , 1993, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[14]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The Transferable Belief Model , 1994, Artif. Intell..

[15]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  Sensor fusion in anti-personnel mine detection using a two-level belief function model , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[16]  Thierry Denoeux,et al.  An evidence-theoretic k-NN rule with parameter optimization , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[17]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The Transferable Belief Model for Quantified Belief Representation , 1998 .

[18]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Handbook of defeasible reasoning and uncertainty management systems: volume 2: reasoning with actual and potential contradictions , 1998 .

[19]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  Advances in the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence , 1994 .

[20]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The Transferable Belief Model , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[21]  J. Kohlas,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Hints: An Approach to the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence , 1995 .

[22]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The Nature of the Unnormalized Beliefs Encountered in the Transferable Belief Model , 1992, UAI.

[23]  Philippe Smets,et al.  Belief functions: The disjunctive rule of combination and the generalized Bayesian theorem , 1993, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[24]  Xavier Briottet,et al.  Presentation and description of two classification methods using data fusion based on sensor management , 2001, Inf. Fusion.