Organisational sustainability: A case for formulating a tailor-made definition

Making sustainability operational within organisational practice requires dealing with three interrelated questions: A "what-question", an "attribute-question" and a "who-question". The complexity of these questions needs a tailor-made interpretation of sustainability. This paper provides a framework that can be used for obtaining such a tailor-made interpretation of sustainability. This framework is based on the notion that staff members somehow need to make sense of sustainability. By taking a cognitive mapping approach, a multidimensional space of sustainability can be deduced. The interpretation of the dimensions of this space can then provide a definition of sustainability. We illustrate the framework by obtaining an image of sustainability for a firm of consulting engineers.

[1]  Thomas Dyllick,et al.  Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability , 2002 .

[2]  Mark W. McElroy,et al.  The New Knowledge Management: Complexity,Learning,and Sustainable Innovation , 2002 .

[3]  G. Kelly,et al.  A Brief Introduction to Personal Construct Theory , 2005 .

[4]  R. Jorna,et al.  Sustainable innovation: The organizational, human and knowledge dimension , 2006 .

[5]  Adrian John Wilkinson,et al.  The sustainability debate , 2001 .

[6]  Jacqueline Cramer,et al.  Corporate social responsibility in Dutch industry , 2004 .

[7]  Marjolein C. Achterkamp,et al.  A framework for making sense of sustainable innovation through stakeholder involvement , 2003 .

[8]  John C. V. Pezzey,et al.  Sustainability: An Interdisciplinary Guide , 1992, Environmental Values.

[9]  Alan R. Longhurst,et al.  The sustainability myth , 2006 .

[10]  M. Charter Sustainable Solutions : Developing Products and Services for the Future , 2001 .

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[12]  P. Bansal Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development , 2005 .

[13]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Mapping Strategic Thought. , 1992 .

[14]  Schneider,et al.  All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[15]  A. Gouldson,et al.  Environmental Management and Business Strategy , 1993 .

[16]  Irene Henriques,et al.  Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry , 2005 .

[17]  Todd McElroy,et al.  Framing effects: An analytic–holistic perspective ☆ , 2003 .

[18]  Vittorio Chiesa,et al.  Towards a sustainable view of the competitive system , 1999 .

[19]  John M. Gowdy,et al.  Sustainability in Question: The Search for a Conceptual Framework , 1999 .

[20]  K. Langfield-Smith EXPLORING THE NEED FOR A SHARED COGNITIVE MAP , 1992 .

[21]  Karina Funk Sustainability and Performance , 2003 .

[22]  Jan Bebbington,et al.  Sustainable Development: A Review of the International Development, Business and Accounting Literature , 2000 .

[23]  Roderic A. Gill,et al.  Planning for sustainability as a learning concept , 1998 .

[24]  Mark W. McElroy,et al.  The New Knowledge Management , 2000 .

[25]  Muel Kaptein,et al.  Sustainability Management: Balancing Conflicting Economic, Environmental and Social Corporate Responsibilities , 2001 .

[26]  James W. Sheppard Overcoming Obstacles to Sustainability , 2003 .

[27]  René J. Jorna,et al.  THE SUSTAINABILITY OF "SUSTAINABILITY" — A STUDY INTO THE CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE NOTION OF "SUSTAINABILITY" , 2005 .

[28]  P Gilding,et al.  Safe Companies: An Alternative Approach to Operationalizing Sustainability , 2002 .

[29]  P. Groenen,et al.  Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications , 1999 .

[30]  Robert B. Gibson,et al.  STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AS A MEANS OF PURSUING SUSTAINABILITY: TEN ADVANTAGES AND TEN CHALLENGES , 2001 .

[31]  S. Banerjee,et al.  Organisational Strategies for Sustainable Development: Developing A Research Agenda for the New Millennium , 2002 .

[32]  G. Midgley Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice , 2000 .

[33]  James N. Druckman,et al.  On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame? , 2001, The Journal of Politics.