Development and plasticity of the neural circuitry underlying visual recognition memory.

In adult monkeys, visual recognition memory, as measured by the delayed nonmatching to sample (DNMS) task, requires the interaction between inferior temporal cortical area TE and medial temporal lobe structures (mainly the entorhinal and perirhinal cortical areas). Ontogenetically, monkeys do not perform at adult levels of proficiency on the DNMS task until 2 years of age. Recent studies have demonstrated that this protracted development of visual recognition memory is due to an immaturity of the association areas of the neocortex rather than the medial temporal lobe. For example, lesions of the medial temporal lobe structures in infancy or in adulthood yield profound and permanent visual recognition loss, indicating that the medial temporal lobe structures operate early in life to sustain visual memory. In contrast, early lesions of area TE, unlike late lesions, result in a significant and long-lasting sparing of visual memory ability. Further evidence for neocortical immaturity is provided by studies of the development of opiatergic and cholinergic receptors, of the maturation of metabolic activity, and of the connectivity between inferior temporal areas TE and TEO and cortical and subcortical structures. Together these results indicate greater compensatory potential after neonatal cortical than after neonatal medial temporal removals. In support of this view, early damage to area TE leads to the maintenance of normally transient projections as well as to reorganization in cortical areas outside the temporal lobe. In addition, lesion studies indicate that, during infancy, visual recognition functions are widely distributed throughout many visual association areas but, with maturation, these functions become localized to area TE. Thus, the maintenance of exuberant projections together with reorganization in other cortical areas of the brain could account for the preservation of visual memories in monkeys that have had area TE removed in infancy.

[1]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Oculocentric spatial representation in parietal cortex. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Transient subcortical connections of inferior temporal areas TE and TEO in infant macaque monkeys , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  M Mishkin,et al.  Long-term effects of selective neonatal temporal lobe lesions on learning and memory in monkeys. , 1995, Behavioral neuroscience.

[4]  Bryan Kolb,et al.  Plasticity in the neocortex: mechanisms underlying recovery from early brain damage , 1989, Progress in Neurobiology.

[5]  L R Squire,et al.  Lesions of the hippocampal formation but not lesions of the fornix or the mammillary nuclei produce long-lasting memory impairment in monkeys , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Connections of inferior temporal areas TE and TEO with medial temporal- lobe structures in infant and adult monkeys , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  J. Bachevalier,et al.  Ontogenetic Development of Habit and Memory Formation in Primates , 1990, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  D. Amaral,et al.  Lesions of perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex that spare the amygdala and hippocampal formation produce severe memory impairment , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus monkeys , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  L. Squire,et al.  Enduring memory impairment in monkeys after ischemic damage to the hippocampus , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  J. Bachevalier,et al.  Limbic-dependent recognition memory in monkeys develops early in infancy. , 1993, Neuroreport.

[12]  T. Kemper,et al.  The neuronographic and metric study of the dendritic arbours of neurons in the motor cortex of Macaca mulatta at birth and at 24 months of age. , 1973, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  M Mishkin,et al.  Effects of selective neonatal temporal lobe lesions on visual recognition memory in rhesus monkeys , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  A. Diamond,et al.  The Development and Neural Bases of Memory Functions as Indexed by the AB and Delayed Response Tasks in Human Infants and Infant Monkeys a , 1990, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Connections of inferior temporal areas TEO and TE with parietal and frontal cortex in macaque monkeys. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  M Mishkin,et al.  An analysis of short-term visual memory in the monkey. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[17]  H. Rodman Development of inferior temporal cortex in the monkey. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  M. Mishkin A memory system in the monkey. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[19]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Regional distribution of [3H]naloxone binding in the brain of a newborn rhesus monkey. , 1986, Brain research.

[20]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Lesions of inferior temporal area TE in infant monkeys alter cortico-amygdalar projections. , 1991, Neuroreport.