Application of Histomorphometric Methods to the Study of Bone Repair

ABSTRACT: Standardized methods for the histomorphometric assessment of bone are essential features of most studies of metabolic bone diseases and their treatments. These methodologies were developed to assess coupled remodeling, focusing primarily on osteoblasts and osteoclasts, the anabolic and catabolic rates of these cells, and structural features of mature bone. Research studies on bone healing and the development of new therapeutic approaches for the enhancement of bone repair also require a comprehensive understanding of the basic cellular and tissue level mechanisms that underlie these processes. However, the histological methods developed for metabolic bone disease studies are not completely suitable for studies of bone repair because they are based on assumptions that there is little variation in tissue composition within a sample of bone and not generally designed to quantify other types of tissues, such as cartilage, that contribute to bone healing. These techniques also do not provide tissue‐based structural measurements that are relatable to the specific types of biomechanical and radiographic structural assessments that are used to determine rates of bone healing. These deficiencies in current histological approaches therefore point to the need to establish standardized criteria for the histomorphometric assessments that are specifically adapted for the study of bone repair in models of fracture healing and bone regeneration. In this Perspective, we outline what we believe to be the specific structural, tissue. and cellular aspects that need to be addressed to establish these standardized criteria for the histomorphometric assessment of bone repair. We present the specific technical considerations that need to be addressed to appropriately sample repair tissues to obtain statistically meaningful results and suggest specific procedures and definitions of nomenclatures for the application of this technology to bone repair. Finally, we present how aspects of histomorphometric measurements of bone repair can be related to biomechanical and radiographic imaging properties that functionally define rates of bone healing, and thus, how these tools can be used to provide corroborating data.

[1]  B. Mitlak,et al.  Enhancement of experimental fracture-healing by systemic administration of recombinant human parathyroid hormone (PTH 1-34). , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  L. Claes,et al.  Prediction of fracture callus mechanical properties using micro-CT images and voxel-based finite element analysis. , 2005, Bone.

[3]  E. Schwarz,et al.  A novel murine segmental femoral graft model , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Mechanical environment alters tissue formation patterns during fracture repair , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  T. Einhorn,et al.  Expression of angiogenic factors during distraction osteogenesis. , 2003, Bone.

[6]  A. M. Simon,et al.  Cyclooxygenase-2 function is essential for bone fracture healing , 2003 .

[7]  D. Graves,et al.  Impaired Fracture Healing in the Absence of TNF‐α Signaling: The Role of TNF‐α in Endochondral Cartilage Resorption , 2003 .

[8]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  A single percutaneous injection of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 accelerates fracture repair. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  K. Seibert,et al.  Differential inhibition of fracture healing by non‐selective and cyclooxygenase‐2 selective non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  O. Reikerås,et al.  Influence of Extensive Muscle Injury on Fracture Healing in Rat Tibia , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[11]  Yuehuei H. An,et al.  Handbook of Histology Methods for Bone and Cartilage , 2003, Humana Press.

[12]  Thomas A Einhorn,et al.  Fracture healing as a post‐natal developmental process: Molecular, spatial, and temporal aspects of its regulation , 2003, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[13]  L. Claes,et al.  The effect of mechanical stability on local vascularization and tissue differentiation in callus healing , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  A. M. Simon,et al.  Cyclo‐Oxygenase 2 Function Is Essential for Bone Fracture Healing , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[15]  E. Schwarz,et al.  Cyclooxygenase-2 regulates mesenchymal cell differentiation into the osteoblast lineage and is critically involved in bone repair. , 2002, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[16]  T A Einhorn,et al.  Expression of Osteoprotegerin, Receptor Activator of NF‐κB Ligand (Osteoprotegerin Ligand) and Related Proinflammatory Cytokines During Fracture Healing , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  T. Einhorn,et al.  Bone Regeneration: New Findings and Potential Clinical Applications , 2001, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[18]  R. Marx,et al.  Method for automated cartilage histomorphometry. , 1999, Tissue engineering.

[19]  T A Einhorn,et al.  The cell and molecular biology of fracture healing. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: a quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography. , 1998, Bone.

[21]  R. Coutts,et al.  A methodology for the quantitative assessment of articular cartilage histomorphometry. , 1997, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[22]  E. Chao,et al.  Formation of bone in tibial defects in a canine model. Histomorphometric and biomechanical studies. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  G S Beaupré,et al.  Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[24]  M. Drezner,et al.  Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the asbmr histomorphometry nomenclature committee , 1987, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[25]  A. Grodzinsky,et al.  Electrical stimulation of repair of bone. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  E. Eriksen,et al.  Normal and pathological remodeling of human trabecular bone: three dimensional reconstruction of the remodeling sequence in normals and in metabolic bone disease. , 1986, Endocrine reviews.

[27]  I. Lieberman,et al.  Lumbar intervertebral body fusion cages: histological evaluation of clinically failed cages retrieved from humans. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  Louis C Gerstenfeld,et al.  Diabetes causes decreased osteoclastogenesis, reduced bone formation, and enhanced apoptosis of osteoblastic cells in bacteria stimulated bone loss. , 2004, Endocrinology.

[29]  Mandi J. Lopez,et al.  Histologic Analysis of Bone Healing , 2003 .

[30]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Biomechanics of Bone , 1993 .

[31]  H. Aro,et al.  Determination of callus quantity in 4‐ week‐old fractures of the rat tibia , 1985, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.