Miniaturized pressure-guide-wire: evaluation in vitro and in isolated hearts.

UNLABELLED The present study focused on the accuracy and reproducability of measurements performed with a miniaturized pressure guidewire system (PGWS) under standardized in vitro conditions and in an isolated pig heart model. We used a pressure guide wire system provided by Pressure Guide, Radi Medical Systems, Uppsala, Sweden. Pressures were recorded by a fiber optic pressure sensor located laterally and 3 cm from the distal end. The basic principle is that the element modulates an optical reflection by pressure induced elastic movements. The light source is an emitting diode in the control unit. The PGWS replaces a standard 0.018 in. guidewire. The PGWS was introduced through a Y-adapter in a recirculating perfusion model, consisting of tubing with internal diameters from 1.00 to 4.00 mm. Different perfusion pressures (range 20-140 mm Hg) were generated by a pressure controlled roller pump. RESULTS Different lumen sizes from 1 to 4 mm had no influence on the measurements. a) In a range from 20 to 140 mm Hg no significant differences were found between the perfusion pressure and the pressures obtained by the PGWS, resulting in an r-value of 0.99 and an equation of y = 1.04x + 1.9. b) In pressure measurements proximal and distal of an artificial stenoses resulting in gradients from 0 to 100 mm Hg, the PGWS correctly identified the pressure difference with an equally high accuracy, 1, 2, and 3 cm behind the stenoses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  J. Hodgson,et al.  Intracoronary ultrasound imaging: correlation of plaque morphology with angiography, clinical syndrome and procedural results in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  R Erbel,et al.  Classification of morphologic effects of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty assessed by intravascular ultrasound. , 1992, American Journal of Cardiology.

[3]  L. Tenerz,et al.  Initial experiences with a miniaturized pressure transducer during coronary angioplasty. , 1991, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[4]  J. Hodgson,et al.  Prediction of long-term clinical outcome with final translesional pressure gradient during coronary angioplasty. , 1986, Circulation.

[5]  J. Burton,et al.  Implication of transstenotic coronary pressure gradient measurement during coronary angioplasty. , 1986, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[6]  J. Douglas,et al.  Influence of intimal dissection on restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty. , 1985, Circulation.

[7]  J. D. Garnic,et al.  Usefulness of transstenotic coronary pressure gradient measurements during diagnostic catheterization. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  R. Leiboff,et al.  Determinants of transstenotic gradients observed during angioplasty: an experimental model. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  F. Klocke,et al.  Measurements of coronary blood flow and degree of stenosis: current clinical implications and continuing uncertainties. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  W. Siegenthaler,et al.  Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  D. Hackel,et al.  Comparison of angiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1975, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  J E Edwards,et al.  Correlation of the Antemortem Coronary Arteriogram and the Postmortem Specimen , 1973, Circulation.