‘Seeing with the hands’: Blindness, touch and the Enlightenment spatial imaginary

The centrality of the so-called Molyneux problem and its concern with blindness, touch and sight is examined here in relation to some current work in psychology and neuropsychology. From debates and correspondence in the 18th century onwards, sparked by this hypothetical question, first-person accounts from blind people were sought to bolster these philosophical speculations. The question asked by Molyneux is crucial in Enlightenment philosophy, and is discussed in a series of dialogues between philosophers such as Locke, Berkeley, Descartes and Diderot. This article shows how such a historical and philosophical moment was an attempt to draw together a psychological philosophy of sensory experience, and how its legacy concerning a spatial imaginary remains to this day.

[1]  S. Millar.  Understanding and Representing Space: Theory and Evidence from Studies with Blind and Sighted Children , 1994 .

[2]  John M. Kennedy,et al.  Space, haptics and the blind , 1992 .

[3]  M. Blades,et al.  Understanding spatial concepts at the geographic scale without the use of vision , 1997 .

[4]  Michael E. Monbeck.  The meaning of blindness;: Attitudes toward blindness and blind people , 1973 .

[5]  Arnold Sorsby.  The Story of Blindness. , 1957 .

[6]  R. Gregory.  Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing , 1969 .

[7]  Michael J. Morgan,et al.  Molyneux's Question: Vision, Touch and the Philosophy of Perception. , 1979 .

[8]  The Problem of Space with Particular Emphasis on Specific Sensory Spaces , 1937 .

[9]  M. Barasch.  Blindness: The History of a Mental Image in Western Thought , 2001 .

[10]  M. V. Senden.  Space and sight : the perception of space and shape in the congenitally blind before and after operation , 1960 .

[11]  Martin Jay,et al.  Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought , 1993 .

[12]  L. Marks.  The Unity of the Senses , 1978 .

[13]  L. Marks.  The Unity of the Senses: Interrelations Among the Modalities , 1978 .

[14]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Spatial cognition of the blind and sighted : visual and amodal hypotheses , 1992 .

[15]  Aristotle,et al.  De anima = On the soul , 1986 .

[16]  J. Rabins,et al.  Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century , 1992 .

[17]  John M. Hull,et al.  Touching the Rock : An Experience of Blindness , 1990 .

[18]  Susan A. Rose,et al.  From hand to eye: Findings and issues in infant cross-modal transfer. , 1994 .

[19]  Rosaleen A. McCarthy,et al.  Spatial Representation: Problems in Philosophy and Psychology , 1993 .

[20]  Diderot's Early Philosophical Works , 1917, Nature.

[21]  R. Jacobson,et al.  Cognitive Mapping Without Sight: four preliminary studies of spatial learning , 1998 .

[22]  F. J. Langdon,et al.  The Child's Conception of Space , 1967 .

[23]  R. Gregory,et al.  Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing , 1969 .

[24]  B. Jones,et al.  Spatial perception in the blind. , 1975, British journal of psychology.

[25]  J. G. Wallace,et al.  Recovery from early blindness : a case study , 1963 .

[26]  Torø Graven,et al.  Aspects of object recognition: When touch replaces vision as the dominant sense modality , 2003 .

[27]  J. Locke.  An Essay concerning Human Understanding , 1924, Nature.

[28]  S. Gallagher.  How the body shapes the mind , 2005 .

[29]  Psychology: An Introductory Study of the Structure and Function of Human Consciousness. , 1905 .

[30]  George Berkeley,et al.  Philosophical works: Including the works on vision , 1975 .

[31]  Sara Shute,et al.  Molyneux's question. Vision, touch, and the philosophy of perception , 1979, Medicina e historia.

[32]  K. H. Stauder,et al.  Psychology of the Child , 1959 .

[33]  É. Fontenay.  Diderot, reason and resonance , 1982 .

[34]  G. Révész,et al.  Psychology and art of the blind , 1950 .

[35]  John C. Marshall,et al.  Sight unseen? , 1992, Current Biology.