Thresholding functional connectomes by means of mixture modeling

&NA; Functional connectivity has been shown to be a very promising tool for studying the large‐scale functional architecture of the human brain. In network research in fMRI, functional connectivity is considered as a set of pair‐wise interactions between the nodes of the network. These interactions are typically operationalized through the full or partial correlation between all pairs of regional time series. Estimating the structure of the latent underlying functional connectome from the set of pair‐wise partial correlations remains an open research problem though. Typically, this thresholding problem is approached by proportional thresholding, or by means of parametric or non‐parametric permutation testing across a cohort of subjects at each possible connection. As an alternative, we propose a data‐driven thresholding approach for network matrices on the basis of mixture modeling. This approach allows for creating subject‐specific sparse connectomes by modeling the full set of partial correlations as a mixture of low correlation values associated with weak or unreliable edges in the connectome and a sparse set of reliable connections. Consequently, we propose to use alternative thresholding strategy based on the model fit using pseudo‐False Discovery Rates derived on the basis of the empirical null estimated as part of the mixture distribution. We evaluate the method on synthetic benchmark fMRI datasets where the underlying network structure is known, and demonstrate that it gives improved performance with respect to the alternative methods for thresholding connectomes, given the canonical thresholding levels. We also demonstrate that mixture modeling gives highly reproducible results when applied to the functional connectomes of the visual system derived from the n‐back Working Memory task in the Human Connectome Project. The sparse connectomes obtained from mixture modeling are further discussed in the light of the previous knowledge of the functional architecture of the visual system in humans. We also demonstrate that with use of our method, we are able to extract similar information on the group level as can be achieved with permutation testing even though these two methods are not equivalent. We demonstrate that with both of these methods, we obtain functional decoupling between the two hemispheres in the higher order areas of the visual cortex during visual stimulation as compared to the resting state, which is in line with previous studies suggesting lateralization in the visual processing. However, as opposed to permutation testing, our approach does not require inference at the cohort level and can be used for creating sparse connectomes at the level of a single subject. HighlightsSparse functional connectomes are useful in analyzing and interpreting fMRI data.We propose thresholding by means of mixture modeling and control of FDR.We benchmark the approach on synthetic fMRI data against established methods.We apply the method to the resting state and working memory task datasets from HCP500.Results are reproducible on synthetic data and interpretable on experimental data.

[1]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Xiaoqi Huang,et al.  Disrupted Brain Connectivity Networks in Drug-Naive, First-Episode Major Depressive Disorder , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[3]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Comparing Brain Networks of Different Size and Connectivity Density Using Graph Theory , 2010, PloS one.

[4]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object and spatial visual working memory activate separate neural systems in human cortex. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Task-free MRI predicts individual differences in brain activity during task performance , 2016, Science.

[6]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measurement and analysis of online social networks , 2007, IMC '07.

[7]  O. Güntürkün,et al.  Asymmetry pays: visual lateralization improves discrimination success in pigeons , 2000, Current Biology.

[8]  D Marinazzo,et al.  Ising model with conserved magnetization on the human connectome: Implications on the relation structure-function in wakefulness and anesthesia. , 2015, Chaos.

[9]  Habib Benali,et al.  Partial correlation for functional brain interactivity investigation in functional MRI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[10]  Rajan S. Patel,et al.  A Bayesian approach to determining connectivity of the human brain , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Ronald Christensen,et al.  Plane Answers to Complex Questions , 1987, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[12]  M. Catani,et al.  A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Natalia Z Bielczyk,et al.  The impact of hemodynamic variability and signal mixing on the identifiability of effective connectivity structures in BOLD fMRI , 2017, Brain and behavior.

[14]  Steen Moeller,et al.  ICA-based artefact removal and accelerated fMRI acquisition for improved resting state network imaging , 2014, NeuroImage.

[15]  G. Glover,et al.  Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Major Depression: Abnormally Increased Contributions from Subgenual Cingulate Cortex and Thalamus , 2007, Biological Psychiatry.

[16]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Best Practices in Data Analysis and Sharing in Neuroimaging using MRI , 2016 .

[17]  Stephan Ripke,et al.  Reliability in adolescent fMRI within two years – a comparison of three tasks , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Jan K Buitelaar,et al.  Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder symptoms coincide with altered striatal connectivity. , 2016, Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging.

[19]  Liang Wang,et al.  Probabilistic Maps of Visual Topography in Human Cortex. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  Olivier Ledoit,et al.  Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection , 2003 .

[21]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Neuroimaging Weighs In: Humans Meet Macaques in “Primate” Visual Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Erno J. Hermans,et al.  Altered functional connectivity of the amygdaloid input nuclei in adolescents and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: a resting state fMRI study , 2016, Molecular Autism.

[24]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Function in the human connectome: Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior , 2013, NeuroImage.

[25]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Hierarchical organization and functional streams in the visual cortex , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  Walter Schneider,et al.  A rapid fMRI task battery for mapping of visual, motor, cognitive, and emotional function , 2006, NeuroImage.

[28]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Widespread correlation patterns of fMRI signal across visual cortex reflect eccentricity organization , 2015, eLife.

[29]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Fused Estimation of Sparse Connectivity Patterns From Rest fMRI—Application to Comparison of Children and Adult Brains , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  G. Box NON-NORMALITY AND TESTS ON VARIANCES , 1953 .

[32]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The human visual cortex. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[33]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  New advances in the Clinica software platform for clinical neuroimaging studies , 2019 .

[34]  G. Cecchi,et al.  Scale-free brain functional networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[36]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Human brain networks in health and disease , 2009, Current opinion in neurology.

[37]  C. Beckmann,et al.  Resting-state functional connectivity in major depressive disorder: A review , 2015, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[38]  Steen Moeller,et al.  Pushing spatial and temporal resolution for functional and diffusion MRI in the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[39]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  B. Efron Size, power and false discovery rates , 2007, 0710.2245.

[41]  M. Pellegrini,et al.  Protein Interaction Networks , 2004, Expert review of proteomics.

[42]  Mark Hymers,et al.  Specialized and independent processing of orientation and shape in visual field maps LO1 and LO2 , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  B. T. Thomas Yeo,et al.  Proportional thresholding in resting-state fMRI functional connectivity networks and consequences for patient-control connectome studies: Issues and recommendations , 2017, NeuroImage.

[45]  B. Biswal,et al.  The resting brain: unconstrained yet reliable. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  C. F. Beckmann,et al.  Variational Mixture Models with Gamma or inverse-Gamma components , 2016, 1607.07573.

[47]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[48]  Cornelis J. Stam,et al.  Small-world and scale-free organization of voxel-based resting-state functional connectivity in the human brain , 2008, NeuroImage.

[49]  Ludovica Griffanti,et al.  Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: Combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers , 2014, NeuroImage.

[50]  S. Edelman,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:316–328(1998) � A Sequence of Object-Processing Stages Revealed by fMRI in the Human Occipital Lobe , 2022 .

[51]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[52]  Dwight Barkley,et al.  Computational study of turbulent laminar patterns in couette flow. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[53]  Dost Öngür,et al.  Anticorrelations in resting state networks without global signal regression , 2012, NeuroImage.

[54]  William J. Welch,et al.  Construction of Permutation Tests , 1990 .

[55]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Cortical connections of areas V3 and VP of macaque monkey extrastriate visual cortex , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[56]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[57]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[58]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  T. Hendler,et al.  Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[60]  Chuong B Do,et al.  What is the expectation maximization algorithm? , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[61]  Charles E. McCulloch,et al.  Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival, and Repeated Measures Models , 2005 .

[62]  Koen V. Haak,et al.  Objective analysis of the topological organization of the human cortical visual connectome suggests three visual pathways , 2018, Cortex.

[63]  Marcel van Gerven,et al.  Increasingly complex representations of natural movies across the dorsal stream are shared between subjects , 2017, NeuroImage.

[64]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Brain Network Analysis: Separating Cost from Topology Using Cost-Integration , 2011, PloS one.

[65]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Pairwise likelihood ratios for estimation of non-Gaussian structural equation models , 2013, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[66]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Human Connectome Project informatics: Quality control, database services, and data visualization , 2013, NeuroImage.

[67]  E. Warrington,et al.  Two Categorical Stages of Object Recognition , 1978, Perception.

[68]  Hernando Ombao,et al.  Quantifying temporal correlations: A test–retest evaluation of functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI , 2013, NeuroImage.

[69]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Efficiency and Cost of Economical Brain Functional Networks , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[70]  T. Hendler,et al.  A hierarchical axis of object processing stages in the human visual cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[71]  Viola Borchardt,et al.  Cognitive Processing Involves Dynamic Reorganization of the Whole-Brain Network's Functional Community Structure , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[72]  Maarten Mennes,et al.  Assessing age-dependent multi-task functional co-activation changes using measures of task-potency , 2017, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[73]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[74]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[75]  B. Wandell,et al.  Visual Field Maps in Human Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[76]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[77]  M. Pellicoro,et al.  Conserved Ising Model on the Human Connectome , 2015, 1509.02697.

[78]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[79]  Stephen Smith,et al.  Linking cognition to brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[80]  Natalia Z. Bielczyk,et al.  Causal inference in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2017, 1708.04020.

[81]  Steen Moeller,et al.  The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective , 2012, NeuroImage.

[82]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[83]  Scott K. Holland,et al.  Functional and structural connectivity of the visual system in infants with perinatal brain injury , 2016, Pediatric Research.

[84]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[85]  D. Botstein,et al.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[86]  Malcolm P. Young,et al.  Objective analysis of the topological organization of the primate cortical visual system , 1992, Nature.

[87]  B. Harrison,et al.  Altered Cortico-Striatal Functional Connectivity in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , 2009, NeuroImage.

[88]  Charles Elkan,et al.  Expectation Maximization Algorithm , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[89]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[90]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[91]  R. Kahn,et al.  Aberrant Frontal and Temporal Complex Network Structure in Schizophrenia: A Graph Theoretical Analysis , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[92]  Moo K. Chung,et al.  Brain Network Analysis , 2019 .

[93]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity of default mode network components: Correlation, anticorrelation, and causality , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[94]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[95]  Jean-Philippe Thiran,et al.  DTI mapping of human brain connectivity: statistical fibre tracking and virtual dissection , 2003, NeuroImage.

[96]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[97]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An Empirical Bayes Mixture Model for Effect Size Distributions in Genome-Wide Association Studies , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[98]  R. Yuste,et al.  Dense Inhibitory Connectivity in Neocortex , 2011, Neuron.

[99]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Aberrant "default mode" functional connectivity in schizophrenia. , 2007, The American journal of psychiatry.

[100]  Leonardo L. Gollo,et al.  Connectome sensitivity or specificity: which is more important? , 2016, NeuroImage.

[101]  Yufeng Zang,et al.  Abnormal small-world architecture of top-down control networks in obsessive-compulsive disorder. , 2011, Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN.

[102]  Nora C. Vetter,et al.  Test-retest reliability of longitudinal task-based fMRI: Implications for developmental studies , 2017, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[103]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[104]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Functional Connectivity and Brain Networks in Schizophrenia , 2010 .

[105]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Network modelling methods for FMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[106]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  A positive-negative mode of population covariation links brain connectivity, demographics and behavior , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[107]  Daniel P. Kennedy,et al.  Largely typical patterns of resting-state functional connectivity in high-functioning adults with autism. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[108]  Alexandre R. Franco,et al.  Evaluating the reliability of different preprocessing steps to estimate graph theoretical measures in resting state fMRI data , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[109]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[110]  Peter Fransson,et al.  Assessing the Influence of Different ROI Selection Strategies on Functional Connectivity Analyses of fMRI Data Acquired During Steady-State Conditions , 2011, PloS one.