Comparison of the CMAC D-Blade , Conventional CMAC , and Macintosh Laryngoscopes in Simulated Easy and Difficult Airways Normal ve

182 Amaç: Yakın bir zamanda zor havayolu yönetiminin mevcut potansiyelini daha da geliştirmek için CMAC sistemine, blade’i daha fazla açılandırılmış “CMAC D-blade” eklendi. Bu çalışmanın amacı, normal ve zor havayolu simülasyonlarında yeni CMAC D-blade in laringoskopik görüntü ve entübasyon parametrelerini konvansiyonel CMAC video laringoskop ve Macintosh direkt laringoskop (ML) ile karşılaştırarak araştırmaktı.

[1]  E. Cavus,et al.  Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: a randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways. , 2013, Minerva anestesiologica.

[2]  D. Williams,et al.  Randomized controlled trial comparing the McGrath videolaryngoscope with the C-MAC videolaryngoscope in intubating adult patients with potential difficult airways. , 2012, British journal of anaesthesia.

[3]  A. Brambrink,et al.  Comparative Effectiveness of the C-MAC Video Laryngoscope versus Direct Laryngoscopy in the Setting of the Predicted Difficult Airway , 2012, Anesthesiology.

[4]  C. Werner,et al.  Performance of the C‐MAC video laryngoscope in patients after a limited glottic view using Macintosh laryngoscopy , 2011, Anaesthesia.

[5]  P. Bassett,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of the A.P. Advance, McGrath, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in normal and difficult intubation scenarios: a manikin study. , 2011, British journal of anaesthesia.

[6]  Chien‐Chih Chen,et al.  Comparison of video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials , 2011, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[7]  J. Laffey,et al.  Comparison of the C-MAC®, Airtraq®, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients undergoing tracheal intubation with cervical spine immobilization. , 2011, British journal of anaesthesia.

[8]  E. Cavus,et al.  A randomised, controlled crossover comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy in 150 patients during routine induction of anaesthesia , 2011, BMC Anesthesiology.

[9]  B. Bein,et al.  First Clinical Evaluation of the C-MAC D-Blade Videolaryngoscope During Routine and Difficult Intubation , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[10]  C. Werner,et al.  Evaluation of the McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope after failed direct laryngoscopy * , 2010, Anaesthesia.

[11]  G. Merli.  Videolaryngoscopy: is it only a change of view? , 2010, Minerva anestesiologica.

[12]  J. Laffey,et al.  Determination of the optimal stylet strategy for the C‐MAC® videolaryngoscope , 2010, Anaesthesia.

[13]  N. Flynn,et al.  Comparison of the C‐MAC® videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope®, and Airtraq® laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins , 2010, Anaesthesia.

[14]  E. Cavus,et al.  The C-MAC Videolaryngoscope: First Experiences with a New Device for Videolaryngoscopy-Guided Intubation , 2010, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[15]  Ruben A. Lee,et al.  A Comparison of Three Videolaryngoscopes: The Macintosh Laryngoscope Blade Reduces, but Does Not Replace, Routine Stylet Use for Intubation in Morbidly Obese Patients , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[16]  J. Laffey,et al.  A comparison of the Glidescope®, Pentax AWS®, and Macintosh laryngoscopes when used by novice personnel: a manikin study , 2009, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[17]  T. Turkstra,et al.  Cervical Spine Motion: A Fluoroscopic Comparison of the AirTraq Laryngoscope versus the Macintosh Laryngoscope , 2009, Anesthesiology.

[18]  K. Stroumpoulis,et al.  Videolaryngoscopy in the management of the difficult airway: a comparison with the Macintosh blade , 2009, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[19]  J. Laffey,et al.  Comparison of the Airtraq® and Truview® laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by Advanced Paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation in manikins , 2009, BMC emergency medicine.

[20]  J. Laffey,et al.  Comparison of the Glidescope, the Pentax AWS, and the Truview EVO2 with the Macintosh laryngoscope in experienced anaesthetists: a manikin study. , 2009, British journal of anaesthesia.

[21]  G. Savoldelli,et al.  Comparison of the Glidescope®, the McGrath®, the Airtraq® and the Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airways * , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[22]  G. Mashour,et al.  Craniocervical Extension Improves the Specificity and Predictive Value of the Mallampati Airway Evaluation , 2006, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[23]  J. Laffey,et al.  Evaluation of intubation using the Airtraq® or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy – a manikin study * , 2006, Anaesthesia.

[24]  G. Berci,et al.  Seeing is believing: the importance of video laryngoscopy in teaching and in managing the difficult airway , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[25]  C. Verghese,et al.  The Glidescope® system: a clinical assessment of performance , 2005, Anaesthesia.

[26]  T. Mort,et al.  Emergency Tracheal Intubation: Complications Associated with Repeated Laryngoscopic Attempts , 2004, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[27]  T. Cook.  A grading system for direct laryngoscopy , 1999, Anaesthesia.

[28]  S. Yentis,et al.  Evaluation of an improved scoring system for the grading of direct laryngoscopy , 1998, Anaesthesia.

[29]  K. Heath.  The effect on laryngoscopy of different cervical spine immobilization techniques , 1994, Anaesthesia.

[30]  S. Kelley,et al.  Neurologic deterioration associated with airway management in a cervical spine-injured patient. , 1993, Anesthesiology.

[31]  J. Rud.  Adverse respiratory events in anesthesia: A closed claims analysis , 1990 .

[32]  R. Cormack.  Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics , 1986 .