Mass action and mundane reality: an argument for putting crowd analysis at the centre of the social sciences

In this paper I challenge the view that crowd action derives from a loss of identity, that it is mindless and that crowd phenomena are asocial. I argue instead that psychological crowds are based on shared social identification, that crowd action is highly socially meaningful, and that crowd phenomena are fundamental to the understanding and analysis of society. More specifically, I argue that crowds are important to social scientists in terms of (1) informing us about the social understandings of groups, especially marginalised groups; (2) understanding the processes by which cohesive and empowered groups are formed; (3) understanding the processes by which social change occurs; and (4) understanding core cognitive and emotional processes in social groups. I conclude that the study of crowds needs to become far more central in the social sciences.

[1]  J. Barentsen.  The New Psychology of Leadership , 2013 .

[2]  T. Shannon.  As If an Enemy’s Country: The British Occupation of Boston and the Origins of Revolution (review) , 2011 .

[3]  J. Drury,et al.  Come together: two studies concerning the impact of group relations on personal space. , 2010, The British journal of social psychology.

[4]  D. Helbing,et al.  The Walking Behaviour of Pedestrian Social Groups and Its Impact on Crowd Dynamics , 2010, PloS one.

[5]  S. Alexander Haslam,et al.  The Social Identity Approach in Social Psychology , 2010 .

[6]  J. Drury,et al.  Modelling subgroup behaviour in crowd dynamics DEM simulation , 2009 .

[7]  John Drury,et al.  Collective Psychological Empowerment as a Model of Social Change: Researching Crowds and Power , 2009 .

[8]  S. Reicher,et al.  Beyond Help: A Social Psychology of Collective Solidarity and Social Cohesion , 2009 .

[9]  John Drury,et al.  Everyone for themselves? A comparative study of crowd solidarity among emergency survivors. , 2009, The British journal of social psychology.

[10]  Damian Schofield,et al.  Cooperation versus competition in a mass emergency evacuation: A new laboratory simulation and a new theoretical model , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[11]  Leah Hoffmann,et al.  Crowd control , 2009, CACM.

[12]  Christopher Cocking,et al.  The Nature of Collective Resilience: Survivor Reactions to the 2005 London Bombings , 2009, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[13]  S. Reicher,et al.  The Psychology of Crowd Dynamics , 2008 .

[14]  Michael J. Platow,et al.  The New Psychology of Leadership , 2007 .

[15]  Olivier Klein,et al.  Social Identity Performance: Extending the Strategic Side of SIDE , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[16]  S. Reicher,et al.  Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: the BBC prison study. , 2006, The British journal of social psychology.

[17]  N. Hubble.  The Intellectuals and the Masses , 2006 .

[18]  P. Zimbardo.  On rethinking the psychology of tyranny: the BBC prison study. , 2006, The British journal of social psychology.

[19]  J. Drury,et al.  Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes , 2005 .

[20]  J. Drury,et al.  Generalization of Efficacy as a Function of Collective Action and Intergroup Relations: Involvement in an Anti‐Roads Struggle1 , 2004 .

[21]  Clifford Stott,et al.  Transforming the boundaries of collective identity: from the ‘local’ anti-road campaign to ‘global’ resistance? , 2003 .

[22]  J. Drury,et al.  'Hooligans' abroad? Inter-group dynamics, social identity and participation in collective 'disorder' at the 1998 World Cup Finals. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[23]  J. Drury,et al.  Collective action and psychological change: the emergence of new social identities. , 2000, The British journal of social psychology.

[24]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Simulating dynamical features of escape panic , 2000, Nature.

[25]  Clifford Stott,et al.  Crowds, context and identity: Dynamic categorization processes in the 'poll tax riot' , 2000 .

[26]  J. Drury,et al.  The Intergroup Dynamics of Collective Empowerment: Substantiating the Social Identity Model of Crowd Behavior , 1999 .

[27]  Clifford Stott,et al.  How Conflict Escalates: The Inter-Group Dynamics of Collective Football Crowd `Violence' , 1998 .

[28]  三上 剛,et al.  Collective Behaviour , 1997, The Probability Companion for Engineering and Computer Science.

[29]  S. Reicher.  "The Battle of Westminster": Developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. , 1996 .

[30]  T. Postmes,et al.  A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena , 1995 .

[31]  H. Chaiklin,et al.  The Myth of the Madding Crowd , 1992 .

[32]  E. P. Thompson,et al.  Customs in Common. , 1993 .

[33]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[34]  H. Tajfel.  Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[35]  J. Benyon,et al.  Scarman and after , 1984 .

[36]  S. Reicher,et al.  The St. Pauls' riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. , 1984 .

[37]  B. Anderson,et al.  Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism , 1986 .

[38]  D. Smith.  TONYPANDY 1910: DEFINITIONS OF COMMUNITY , 1980 .

[39]  S. Worchel,et al.  The Social psychology of intergroup relations , 1979 .

[40]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[41]  William M. Reddy.  THE TEXTILE TRADE AND THE LANGUAGEOF THE CROWD AT ROUEN 1752–1871 , 1977 .

[42]  N. Z. Davis.  THE RITES OF VIOLENCE: RELIGIOUS RIOT IN SIXTEENTH-CENTURY FRANCE , 1973 .

[43]  E. P. Thompson,et al.  THE MORAL ECONOMY OF THE ENGLISH CROWD IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY , 1971 .

[44]  G. Lefebvre.  La révolution française , 1930 .

[45]  A. Mitscherlich.  Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego , 2020, Nature.