Generating Value Through Online Interaction: Individual and Situational Differences

Although companies try numerous ways to engage consumers through the online communication channel, consumers have their own preferred level of interactivity at a certain time. The mismatch between such preferences and the interactivity companies provide can result in the poor performance of an otherwise nicely designed online marketing message. Existing research on the online medium, however, has failed to capture such critical individual and temporal differences in interaction preferences. The purpose of this paper is to propose a new construct — interaction readiness — that describes consumers’ ability and willingness to interact in an online environment. It argues that it is often the match or mismatch between interaction readiness and the actual level of interactivity provided (rather than the actual interactivity level itself) that defines consumers’ responses.

[1]  Raymond R. Burke Technology and the customer interface: What consumers want in the physical and virtual store , 2002 .

[2]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  i2i trust in e-commerce , 2000, CACM.

[3]  E. Thorson,et al.  The Effects of Progressive Levels of Interactivity and Vividness in Web Marketing Sites , 2001 .

[4]  F. Kardes,et al.  The Role of Direction of Comparison, Attribute-Based Processing, and Attitude-Based Processing in Consumer Preference , 1999 .

[5]  D. Stewart,et al.  From consumer response to active consumer: Measuring the effectiveness of interactive media , 2002 .

[6]  Anthony D. Miyazaki,et al.  Consumer Perceptions of Privacy and Security Risks for Online Shopping , 2001 .

[7]  Eric M. Uslaner,et al.  Social capital and the net , 2000, CACM.

[8]  D. Gefen,et al.  E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust , 2000 .

[9]  Yuping Liu Interactivity and its implications for consumer behavior , 2002 .

[10]  Sonja Grabner-Kraeuter The Role of Consumers' Trust in Online-Shopping , 2002 .

[11]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing , 1994 .

[12]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[13]  Laura A. Peracchio,et al.  “Where there is a will…”: Motivation as a moderator of language processing by bilingual consumers , 2002 .

[14]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  A Trust Model for Consumer Internet Shopping , 2001, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[15]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Moderating Effects of Need for Cognition on Responses to Positively versus Negatively Framed Advertising Messages , 1999 .

[16]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  The unwillingness‐to‐communicate scale: Development and validation , 1976 .

[17]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Controlling the Information Flow: Effects on Consumers' Decision Making and Preferences , 2000 .

[18]  Stacy L. Wood,et al.  Psychological Indicators of Innovation Adoption: Cross-Classification Based on Need for Cognition and Need for Change , 2002 .

[19]  Tracy L. Tuten,et al.  Understanding differences in web usage: The role of need for cognition and the five factor model of personality. , 2001 .

[20]  K. Shah e-Commerce , 2015, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[21]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Reputation systems , 2000, CACM.

[22]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Trust in Internet Shopping: Instrument Development and Validation through Classical and Modern Approaches , 2001, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[23]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  An attitudinal model of technology-based self-service: Moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors , 2002 .

[24]  G. Balabanis,et al.  Consumer Attitudes Towards Multi-Channel Retailers' Web Sites: The Role of Involvement, Brand Attitude, Internet Knowledge, and Visit Duration , 1970, Journal of Business Strategies.

[25]  Thomas Hill,et al.  Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. , 1987 .

[26]  A. Borchers Trust in Internet Shopping: A Test of a Measurement Instrument , 2001 .

[27]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[28]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments : Conceptual Foundations 1 ) , 1998 .

[29]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Service quality delivery through web sites: A critical review of extant knowledge , 2002, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[30]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychology Review.

[31]  Justine Cassell,et al.  External manifestations of trustworthiness in the interface , 2000, CACM.

[32]  Jens F. Jensen,et al.  Interactivity: Tracking a New Concept in Media and Communication Studies , 1998 .

[33]  Subhash Sharma,et al.  Resistance to technological innovations: An examination of the role of self-efficacy and performance satisfaction , 1991 .