Cell Orientation Entropy (COrE): Predicting Biochemical Recurrence from Prostate Cancer Tissue Microarrays

We introduce a novel feature descriptor to describe cancer cells called Cell Orientation Entropy (COrE). The main objective of this work is to employ COrE to quantitatively model disorder of cell/nuclear orientation within local neighborhoods and evaluate whether these measurements of directional disorder are correlated with biochemical recurrence (BCR) in prostate cancer (CaP) patients. COrE has a number of novel attributes that are unique to digital pathology image analysis. Firstly, it is the first rigorous attempt to quantitatively model cell/nuclear orientation. Secondly, it provides for modeling of local cell networks via construction of subgraphs. Thirdly, it allows for quantifying the disorder in local cell orientation via second order statistical features. We evaluated the ability of 39 COrE features to capture the characteristics of cell orientation in CaP tissue microarray (TMA) images in order to predict 10 year BCR in men with CaP following radical prostatectomy. Randomized 3-fold cross-validation via a random forest classifier evaluated on a combination of COrE and other nuclear features achieved an accuracy of 82.7 +/- 3.1% on a dataset of 19 BCR and 20 non-recurrence patients. Our results suggest that COrE features could be extended to characterize disease states in other histological cancer images in addition to prostate cancer.

[1]  B. Yener,et al.  Cell-Graph Mining for Breast Tissue Modeling and Classification , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh,et al.  Multiwavelet grading of pathological images of prostate , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  J. Epstein,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist. , 2001, Human pathology.

[4]  J. Epstein An update of the Gleason grading system. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[5]  Steven Piantadosi,et al.  Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[6]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Cascaded discrimination of normal, abnormal, and confounder classes in histopathology: Gleason grading of prostate cancer , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[7]  Misop Han,et al.  Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2008, JAMA.

[8]  Robert W Veltri,et al.  Nuclear roundness variance predicts prostate cancer progression, metastasis, and death: A prospective evaluation with up to 25 years of follow‐up after radical prostatectomy , 2010, The Prostate.

[9]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[10]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  An Integrated Region-, Boundary-, Shape-Based Active Contour for Multiple Object Overlap Resolution in Histological Imagery , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  William A. Christens-Barry,et al.  Quantitative Grading of Tissue and Nuclei in Prostate Cancer for Prognosis Prediction , 1997 .

[12]  Mikhail Teverovskiy,et al.  Multifeature Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Histological Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.