Martha Madison: Marvelous Machines: Exploring simple machines in an open-ended, collaborative sandbox

In this paper we discuss the construction of Martha Madison: Marvelous Machines, a serious video game designed to help students learn about the use of simple machines in the everyday world. Game participants are introduced to real-world, meaningful tasks that must be solved through the placement and manipulation of simple machines. The game provides in-game scaffolding and is played collaboratively by students co-located in the same space, playing on the same computer. The Martha Madison game provides learners specific tasks and goals to complete and an open world in which to complete them. The design of Martha Madison is intended to create a dialogue between players in the service of solving authentic problems presented in the game world and providing opportunities for students to change overall perceptions regarding the social and collaborative aspects of STEM work. The authors discuss the reasons, approaches, and challenges of the design of Martha Madison.

[1]  S. Lubienski,et al.  The Development of Gender Achievement Gaps in Mathematics and Reading During Elementary and Middle School , 2011 .

[2]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[3]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[4]  H. Barrows.  Problem‐based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview , 1996 .

[5]  J. Huizinga.  Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture , 1938 .

[6]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[7]  R. Beery,et al.  Fear of Failure in the Student Experience. , 1975 .

[8]  L. S. Vygotksy.  Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[9]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  C. Hmelo‐Silver,et al.  Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) , 2007 .

[11]  Jesse Schell,et al.  The Art of Game Design: A book of lenses , 2019 .

[12]  Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  Play = Learning: How Play Motivates and Enhances Children's Cognitive and Social-Emotional Growth , 2006 .

[13]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Game-based learning : present and future state of the field , 2005 .

[14]  J. Dewey.  Democracy and education : an introduction to philosophy of education / John Dewey , 1916 .

[15]  R. Beery,et al.  Special Feature: Fear of Failure in the Student Experience , 1975 .

[16]  Adrienne Decker,et al.  Evaluating Martha Madison: Developing analytical tools for gauging the breadth of learning facilitated by STEM games , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Games Innovation Conference.

[17]  D. Eichel.  Beyond Boredom And Anxiety Experiencing Flow In Work And Play , 2016 .

[18]  S. Azer.  Introducing a problem-based learning program: 12 tips for success , 2011, Medical teacher.

[19]  Nancy Frey,et al.  Better Learning Through Structured Teaching : A Framework for the Gradual Release of Responsibility , 2008 .

[20]  John Dewey,et al.  The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action , 1960 .

[21]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[22]  Constance Steinkuehler,et al.  Massively multiplayer online games & education: an outline of research , 2007, CSCL.