Multi-purpose Robotic Training Strategies for Neurorehabilitation with Model Predictive Controllers

One of the main challenges in robotic neuroreha-bilitation is to understand how robots should physically interact with trainees to optimize motor leaning. There is evidence that motor exploration (i.e., the active exploration of new motor tasks) is crucial to boost motor learning. Furthermore, effectiveness of a robotic training strategy depends on several factors, such as task type and trainee’s skill level. We propose that Model Predictive Controllers (MPC) can satisfy many training/trainee’s needs simultaneously, while providing a safe environment without restricting trainees to a fixed trajectory. We designed two nonlinear MPCs to support training of a rich dynamic task (a pendulum task) with a delta robot. These MPCs differ from each other in terms of the application point of the intervention force: (i) to the virtual pendulum mass, and (ii) the virtual rod holding point, which corresponds to the robot end-effector. The effect of the MPCs on task performance, physical effort, motivation and sense of agency was evaluated in fourteen healthy participants. We found that the location of the applied controller force affects the task performance -i.e., the MPC that actuates on the pendulum mass significantly reduced performance errors and sense of agency during training, while the other MPC did not, probably due to low force saturation limits and slow optimization speed of the solver. Participants applied significantly more forces when training with the MPC that actuates on the pendulum holding point, probably because they reacted against the robotic assistance. Although MPCs look very promising for neurorehabilitation, further steps have to be taken to improve their technical limitations. Moreover, the effects of MPCs on motor learning should be evaluated.

[1]  Jay H. Lee,et al.  Model predictive control: past, present and future , 1999 .

[2]  Robert Riener,et al.  The effectiveness of robotic training depends on motor task characteristics , 2017, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Robert Riener,et al.  Haptic Error Modulation Outperforms Visual Error Amplification When Learning a Modified Gait Pattern , 2019, Front. Neurosci..

[4]  David M. Huberdeau,et al.  Dual-process decomposition in human sensorimotor adaptation , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[5]  R. Ryan,et al.  EMOTIONS IN NONDIRECTED TEXT LEARNING , 1990 .

[6]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  The Task-Dependent Efficacy of Shared-Control Haptic Guidance Paradigms , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[7]  M. Bryden Measuring handedness with questionnaires , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Robert Riener,et al.  A bio-inspired robotic test bench for repeatable and safe testing of rehabilitation robots , 2016, 2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[9]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[10]  Moritz Diehl,et al.  ACADO toolkit—An open‐source framework for automatic control and dynamic optimization , 2011 .

[11]  Toshiyuki Murakami,et al.  Torque sensorless control in multidegree-of-freedom manipulator , 1993, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[12]  T. Hornby,et al.  Metabolic Costs and Muscle Activity Patterns During Robotic- and Therapist-Assisted Treadmill Walking in Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury , 2006, Physical Therapy.

[13]  Hong Yu Wong,et al.  Owning an Overweight or Underweight Body: Distinguishing the Physical, Experienced and Virtual Body , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  Peter Wolf,et al.  The role of skill level and motor task characteristics on the effectiveness of robotic training: first results , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[15]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.