Infinitesimal Probabilities Based on Grossone

In finite probability theory, the only probability zero event is the impossible one, but in standard Kolmogorov probability theory, probability zero events occur all the time. Prominent logicians, probability experts and philosophers of probability, including Carnap, Kemeny, Shimony, Savage, De Finetti, Jeffrey, have successfully argued that a sound probability should be regular, that is, only the impossible event should have zero probability. This intuition is shared by physicists too. Totality is another desideratum which means that every event should be assigned a probability. Regularity and totality are achievable in rigorous mathematical terms even for infinite events via hyper-reals valued probabilities. While the mathematics of these theories is not objectionable, some philosophical arguments purport to show that infinitesimal probabilities are inherently problematic. In this paper, we present a simpler and natural construction—based on Sergeyev’s calculus with Grossone (in a formalism inspired by Lolli) enriched with infinitesimals—of a regular, total, finitely additive, uniformly distributed probability on infinite sets of positive integers. These probability spaces—which are inspired by and parallels the construction of classical probability—will be briefly studied. In this framework, De Finetti fair lottery has the natural solution and Williamson’s objections against infinitesimal probabilities are mathematically refuted.

[1]  Matthew W. Parker Symmetry arguments against regular probability: A reply to recent objections , 2018, European Journal for Philosophy of Science.

[2]  Gabriele Lolli,et al.  Infinitesimals and infinites in the history of mathematics: A brief survey , 2012, Appl. Math. Comput..

[3]  Peter Olofsson,et al.  Probability, Statistics, and Stochastic Processes , 2005 .

[4]  Mikael Andersson,et al.  Probability, Statistics, and Stochastic Processes: Olofsson/Probability 2E , 2005 .

[5]  Davide Rizza Numerical Methods for Infinite Decision-making Processes , 2019, Int. J. Unconv. Comput..

[6]  Yaroslav D. Sergeyev,et al.  Computations with Grossone-Based Infinities , 2015, UCNC.

[7]  Timothy Williamson,et al.  How probable is an infinite sequence of heads , 2007 .

[8]  N. Mermin,et al.  Physics: QBism puts the scientist back into science , 2014, Nature.

[9]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum Bayesianism as the basis of general theory of decision-making , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  Vieri Benci,et al.  Infinitesimal Probabilities* , 2016, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[11]  Edward Nelson Radically Elementary Probability Theory. (AM-117) , 1987 .

[12]  Yaroslav D. Sergeyev,et al.  Numerical infinities and infinitesimals: Methodology, applications, and repercussions on two Hilbert problems , 2017 .

[13]  Gabriele Lolli,et al.  Metamathematical investigations on the theory of Grossone , 2015, Appl. Math. Comput..

[14]  B. M. Hill,et al.  Theory of Probability , 1990 .

[15]  John K. Truss Foundations of Mathematical Analysis , 1997 .

[16]  Vieri Benci,et al.  Non-Archimedean Probability , 2011, 1106.1524.

[17]  Sylvia Wenmackers,et al.  Fair infinite lotteries , 2010, Synthese.

[18]  Aarnout Brombacher,et al.  Probability... , 2009, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[19]  Vieri Benci,et al.  An Aristotelian notion of size , 2006, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[20]  D. Ellerman On classical finite probability theory as a quantum probability calculus , 2015, 1502.01048.

[21]  L. M. M.-T. Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.

[22]  Yaroslav D. Sergeyev,et al.  A New Applied Approach for Executing Computations with Infinite and Infinitesimal Quantities , 2008, Informatica.