MULTIPLE GENETIC MECHANISMS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF SENESCENCE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

We present the results of selection experiments designed to distinguish between antagonistic pleiotropy and mutation accumulation, two mechanisms for the evolution of senescence. Reverse selection for early‐life fitness was applied to laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster that had been previously selected for late‐life fitness. These populations also exhibited reduced early‐age female fecundity and increased resistance to the stresses of starvation, desiccation, and ethanol, when compared to control populations. Reverse selection was carried out at both uncontrolled, higher larval rearing density and at controlled, lower larval density. In the uncontrolled‐density selection lines, early‐age female fecundity increased to control‐population levels in response to the reintroduction of selection for early‐age fitness. Concomitantly, resistance to starvation declined in agreement with previous observations of a negative genetic correlation between these two characters and in accordance with the antagonistic‐pleiotropy mechanism. However, resistance to stresses of desiccation and ethanol did not decline in the uncontrolled‐density lines during 22 generations of reverse selection for early‐life fitness. The latter results provide evidence that mutation accumulation has also played a role in the evolution of senescence in this set of Drosophila populations. No significant response in early‐age fecundity or starvation resistance was observed in the controlled‐density reverse‐selection lines, supporting previous observations that selection on Drosophila life‐history characters is critically sensitive to larval rearing density.

[1]  G. Gruwez,et al.  An attempt to select for increased longevity in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1979, Gerontology.

[2]  E. Edney,et al.  Evolution of Senescence and Specific Longevity , 1968, Nature.

[3]  L. Luckinbill,et al.  A density threshold for the expression of longevity in Drosophila melanogaster , 1986, Heredity.

[4]  A. Leikola,et al.  [The evolution of aging]. , 1966, Geron.

[5]  K. Kosuda The aging effect on male mating activity inDrosophila melanogaster , 1985, Behavior genetics.

[6]  L. Mueller Evolution of accelerated senescence in laboratory populations of Drosophila. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  L. Luckinbill,et al.  The effects of gene-environment interaction on the expression of longevity , 1985, Heredity.

[8]  M. Rose,et al.  GENETIC COVARIATION AMONG LIFE‐HISTORY COMPONENTS: THE EFFECT OF NOVEL ENVIRONMENTS , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  R. Lande The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. , 1981, Genetics.

[10]  W. G. Hill Design and efficiency of selection experiments for estimating genetic parameters. , 1971, Biometrics.

[11]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  A test of evolutionary theories of senescence , 1980, Nature.

[12]  George C. Williams,et al.  PLEIOTROPY, NATURAL SELECTION, AND THE EVOLUTION OF SENESCENCE , 1957, Science of Aging Knowledge Environment.

[13]  C. Hoste,et al.  The Lansing effect revisited. I. Life-span. , 1974, Experimental gerontology.

[14]  W. Hamilton The moulding of senescence by natural selection. , 1966, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  Sewall Wright,et al.  Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. I, Genetic and Biometric Foundations. , 1969 .

[16]  L. Luckinbill,et al.  SELECTION FOR DELAYED SENESCENCE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  P. Service Physiological Mechanisms of Increased Stress Resistance in Drosophila melanogaster Selected for Postponed Senescence , 1987, Physiological Zoology.

[18]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Genetics of life history in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Sib analysis of adult females. , 1981, Genetics.

[19]  J. M. Wattiaux,et al.  CUMULATIVE PARENTAL AGE EFFECTS IN DROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURA , 1968, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  P. Medawar Old Age and Natural Death , 2019, The Uniqueness of the Individual.

[21]  R. Lenski EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF PLEIOTROPY AND EPISTASIS IN ESCHERICHIA COLI. II. COMPENSATION FOR MALADAPTIVE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH RESISTANCE TO VIRUS T4 , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  T. Dobzhansky,et al.  Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Vol. 1, Genetic and Biometric Foundations , 1969 .

[23]  L. Luckinbill,et al.  Selection for life span in Drosophila melanogaster , 1985, Heredity.

[24]  A. Clark,et al.  Senescence and the Genetic-Correlation Hang-Up , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[25]  Michael R Rose,et al.  LABORATORY EVOLUTION OF POSTPONED SENESCENCE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Genetics of life history in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Exploratory selection experiments. , 1981, Genetics.

[27]  E. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Resistance to Environmental Stress in Drosophila melanogaster Selected for Postponed Senescence , 1985, Physiological Zoology.

[28]  Michael H. Kutner Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .