Distributed Cognition and the Task of Science

This paper gives a characterization of distributed cognition (d-cog) and explores ways that the framework might be applied in studies of science. I argue that a system can only be given a d-cog description if it is thought of as performing a task. Turning our attention to science, we can try to give a global d-cog account of science or local d-cog accounts of particular scientific projects. Several accounts of science can be seen as global d-cog accounts: Robert Merton’s sociology of scientific norms, Philip Kitcher’s 20th-century account of cognitive labor, and Kitcher’s 21st-century notion of well-ordered science. Problems that arise for them arise just because of the way that they attribute a function to science. The paper concludes by considering local d-cog accounts. Here, too, the task is the crux of the matter.

[1]  Michael Strevens,et al.  The role of the priority rule in science , 2003 .

[2]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[3]  A. Clark.  Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again , 1996 .

[4]  On McMullin’s Appreciation of Realism Concerning the Sciences , 2003 .

[5]  J. Ravetz.  Sociology of Science , 1972, Nature.

[6]  M. D. King,et al.  Reason, Tradition, and the Progressiveness of Science , 1971 .

[7]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Research Laboratories as Evolving Distributed Cognitive Systems , 2003 .

[8]  Robert K. Merton,et al.  Science and the Social Order , 1938, Nature.

[9]  Paul Helm,et al.  Manifest and Latent Functions , 1971 .

[10]  Ronald N. Giere,et al.  Discussion Note: Distributed Cognition in Epistemic Cultures , 2002, Philosophy of Science.

[11]  R. Giere,et al.  Where the Cognitive and the Social Merge , 2003 .

[12]  Philipp Slusallek,et al.  Introduction to real-time ray tracing , 2005, SIGGRAPH Courses.

[13]  D. Norman,et al.  A representational analysis of numeration systems , 1995, Cognition.

[14]  D. Wegner,et al.  Cognitive interdependence in close relationships , 1985 .

[15]  P. Kitcher.  Science, Truth, and Democracy , 2001 .

[16]  Editors , 1986, Brain Research Bulletin.

[17]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Interpreting Scientific and Engineering Practices: Integrating the cognitive, social, and cultural dimensions , 2003 .

[18]  Michael A. Bishop.  Existential Cognition: Computational Minds in the World , 1997 .

[19]  R. Merton.  The Normative Structure of Science , 1973 .

[20]  Sean Hagberg,et al.  Edwin Hutchins, Cognition in the Wild , 2004, Minds and Machines.

[21]  Daniel Barwick,et al.  Manifesto of a passionate moderate , 1999 .

[22]  P. Magnus.  Peirce: Underdetermination, Agnosticism, and Related Mistakes , 2005 .

[23]  Verzekeren Naar Sparen,et al.  Cambridge , 1969, Humphrey Burton: In My Own Time.

[24]  D. Hubin,et al.  THE JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY , 2004 .

[25]  Ronald N. Giere.  Computation and Agency in Scientific Cognition , 2003 .

[26]  P. Kitcher.  The Advancement of Science , 1993 .

[27]  Howard Richards.  Deference , 1964, Ethics.

[28]  R. Giere.  The Cognitive Basis of Science: Scientific cognition as distributed cognition , 2002 .

[29]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[30]  D. Wegner.  Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[31]  Ron McClamrock,et al.  Marr's three levels: A re-evaluation , 1991, Minds and Machines.

[32]  S. B. Barnes,et al.  The Scientific Ethos : A deviant viewpoint , 1970, European Journal of Sociology.

[33]  Refractor.  Vision , 2000, The Lancet.