Cross-border impacts of the restriction of hazardous substances: a perspective based on Japanese solders.

Despite the relevance of the global economy, Regulatory Impact Assessments of the restriction of hazardous substances (RoHS) in the European Union (EU) are based only on domestic impacts. This paper explores the cross-border environmental impacts of the RoHS by focusing on the shifts to lead-free solders in Japan, which exports many electronics to the EU. The regulatory impacts are quantified by integrating a material flow analysis for metals constituting a solder with a scenario analysis with and without the RoHS. The results indicate that the EU regulation, the RoHS, has triggered shifts in Japan to lead-free solders, not only for electronics subject to this regulation, but for other products as well. We also find that the RoHS leads to a slow reduction in environmental emissions of the target, lead, but results in a rapid increase in the use of tin and silver in lead-free solders. This indicates the importance of assessing potential alternative substances, the use of which may increase as a result of adhering to the RoHS. The latter constitutes a negative impact because of recent concerns regarding resource criticality.

[1]  Simon Warren,et al.  Methodology of metal criticality determination. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Norihiro Itsubo,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Japanese high-temperature conductive adhesives. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Thomas E. Graedel,et al.  Material substitution: a resource supply perspective , 2002 .

[4]  Kiyotaka Tsunemi,et al.  Assessment of the effects of the Japanese shift to lead-free solders and its impact on material substitution and environmental emissions by a dynamic material flow analysis. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Kenichi Nakajima,et al.  Hybrid input-output approach to metal production and its application to the introduction of lead-free solders. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Robert J. Klee,et al.  Multilevel cycle of anthropogenic copper. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  M. Reuter,et al.  A dynamic model for the assessment of the replacement of lead in solders , 2004 .

[8]  Oladele A. Ogunseitan,et al.  Adopting Lead‐Free Electronics: Policy Differences and Knowledge Gaps , 2004 .

[9]  Anders S. G. Andrae,et al.  Global Life Cycle Impact Assessments of Material Shifts: The Example of a Lead-free Electronics Industry , 2009 .

[10]  Kohmei Halada,et al.  An Approximate Estimation of Total Materials Requirement of Metals , 2001 .

[11]  D. Rubin Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. , 1974 .

[12]  T. Tasaki,et al.  Lifespan of Commodities, Part I , 2010 .

[13]  T. Graedel,et al.  The multilevel cycle of anthropogenic lead II. Results and discussion , 2008 .

[14]  Julie M Schoenung,et al.  Potential environmental impacts from the metals in incandescent, compact fluorescent lamp (CFL), and light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Robert J. Klee,et al.  Contemporary anthropogenic silver cycle: a multilevel analysis. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  T. Graedel,et al.  Anthropogenic cycles of the elements: a critical review. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.