Information Science researchers and designers are well-positioned to become active participants in scholarly and institutional conversations concerning the protection of human subjects. The overall goals of this panel are: 1) to extend the discourse within the Information Science field concerning the protection of human subjects in research; 2) to explore new ways to improve the relationship between researchers and Institutional Review Boards; and 3) to advance current Institutional Review Board policies and procedures concerning the use of iterative, culturally appropriate, qualitative methods within social science research. This panel will stimulate conversations through which “IRBs and investigators accept their common charge to meet the needs of subjects and to improve the quality of research.” (Burke, 2005, p. 921)
[1]
M. B. Moore,et al.
THE TUSKEGEE STUDY OF UNTREATED SYPHILIS; THE 30TH YEAR OF OBSERVATION.
,
1964,
Archives of internal medicine.
[2]
Y. Lincoln.
Institutional Review Boards and Methodological Conservatism: The Challenge to and from Phenomenological Paradigms.
,
2005
.
[3]
Rockwell Dh,et al.
The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis: The 30th Year of Observation
,
1964
.
[4]
G. Burke.
Looking into the institutional review board: observations from both sides of the table.
,
2005,
The Journal of nutrition.
[5]
S. Milgram.
BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE.
,
1963,
Journal of abnormal psychology.