Planning-Constrained Destination Choice in Activity-Based Model

This paper describes a destination choice model estimated for Chicago, Illinois, with the use of a recent survey and a previously developed model of activity planning decision timing. The travel survey data are used to estimate a standard multinomial destination choice model and a model in which the choice set is constrained by what has already been planned in the schedule. The performance of each model is evaluated, as is the effect that using the planning-constrained model in place of the standard model has on the accuracy of the results. Using a model in which the destination choices are conditioned on what has been previously planned improves the accuracy. This improvement is true for correctly predicted location choices, especially for overall trip length distributions in which more realistic distributions are observed when decisions are constrained.

[1]  Joshua Auld,et al.  Framework for the development of the Agent-based Dynamic Activity Planning and Travel Scheduling (ADAPTS) model , 2009 .

[2]  J. Horowitz,et al.  TRAVEL-TIME CONSTRAINTS ON DESTINATION-CHOICE SETS. , 2010 .

[3]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  Generation of Synthetic Daily Activity-Travel Patterns , 1997 .

[4]  J. A. Ansah,et al.  Destination choice set definition in travel behaviour modelling , 1977 .

[5]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  Robust Approach to Modeling Choice of Locations in Daily Activity Sequences , 2007 .

[6]  Andrew Daly,et al.  Estimating choice models containing attraction variables , 1982 .

[7]  F. Pagliara,et al.  Choice set generation in spatial contexts: a review , 2009 .

[8]  A S Fotheringham,et al.  A New Set of Spatial-Interaction Models: The Theory of Competing Destinations † , 1983 .

[9]  Jean-Claude Thill,et al.  Choice set formation for destination choice modelling , 1992 .

[10]  Joshua Auld,et al.  Urban Travel Route and Activity Choice Survey , 2010 .

[11]  Fang Zhao,et al.  Geographically Stratified Importance Sampling for the Calibration of Aggregated Destination Choice Models for Trip Distribution , 2005 .

[12]  David E. Boyce,et al.  Enhanced Destination Choice Models Incorporating Agglomeration Related to Trip Chaining While Controlling for Spatial Competition , 2009 .

[13]  Denis Bolduc,et al.  The Effect of Incentive Policies on the Practice Location of Doctors: A Multinomial Probit Analysis , 1996, Journal of Labor Economics.

[14]  H. Miller Activities in Space and Time , 2004 .

[15]  Torsten Hägerstraand WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE IN REGIONAL SCIENCE , 1970 .

[16]  Pat Burnett,et al.  DISAGGREGATE BEHAVIORAL MODELS OF TRAVEL DECISIONS OTHER THAN MODE CHOICE: A REVIEW AND CONTRIBUTION TO SPATIAL CHOICE THEORY , 1974 .

[17]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Propositions for Modelling Household Decision-Making , 2005 .