Evaluating collision avoidance effects on discomfort in virtual environments

Dynamic, moving characters are increasingly a part of interactive virtual experiences enabled by immersive display technologies such as head-mounted displays (HMDs). In this new context, it is important to consider the impact their behavior has on user experiences. Here, we explore the role collision avoidance between virtual agents and the VR user plays on overall comfort and perceptual experience in an immersive virtual environment. Several users participated in an experiment were they were asked to walk through a dense stream of virtual agents who may or may not be using collision avoidance techniques to avoid them. When collision avoidance was used participants took more direct paths, with less jittering or backtracking, and found the resulting simulated motion to be less intimidating, more realistic, and more comfortable.

[1]  E. Hall.  The Silent Language , 1959 .

[2]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[3]  J. Loomis,et al.  Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[4]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Comparing Behavioral and Self-Report Measures of Embodied Agents' Social Presence in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2004 .

[5]  Susan Persky,et al.  The Independent and Interactive Effects of Embodied-Agent Appearance and Behavior on Self-Report, Cognitive, and Behavioral Markers of Copresence in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[6]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Being a part of the crowd: towards validating VR crowds using presence , 2008, AAMAS.

[7]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  How Our Personality Shapes Our Interactions with Virtual Characters - Implications for Research and Development , 2010, IVA.

[8]  Mel Slater,et al.  Proxemics with multiple dynamic characters in an immersive virtual environment , 2010, TAP.

[9]  Stéphane Donikian,et al.  A synthetic-vision based steering approach for crowd simulation , 2010, ACM Transactions on Graphics.

[10]  Ioannis Karamouzas,et al.  Universal power law governing pedestrian interactions. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[11]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  Velocity-based modeling of physical interactions in dense crowds , 2015, The Visual Computer.

[12]  Julien Pettré,et al.  Going Through, Going Around: A Study on Individual Avoidance of Groups , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[13]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Virtual Crowds: Steps Toward Behavioral Realism , 2015, Virtual Crowds: Steps Toward Behavioral Realism.

[14]  Gerd Bruder,et al.  Virtual proxemics: Locomotion in the presence of obstacles in large immersive projection environments , 2015, 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[15]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Simulating Heterogeneous Crowds with Interactive Behaviors , 2016, Eurographics.

[16]  Ming C. Lin,et al.  WarpDriver: context-aware probabilistic motion prediction for crowd simulation , 2016, ACM Trans. Graph..

[17]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  PedVR: simulating gaze-based interactions between a real user and virtual crowds , 2016, VRST.

[18]  Yiorgos Chrysanthou,et al.  Interaction with virtual crowd in Immersive and semi‐Immersive Virtual Reality systems , 2017, Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds.