Differences in visual attention and task interference between males and females reflect differences in brain laterality

Two cognitive tasks (a letter memory task and a spatial memory task) designed to selectively activate the left or right hemisphere were combined with attentional probe tasks to measure how hemispheric activation affects attention to left and right hemifields. The probe task in Experiment 1 required the identification of digits in the left and right hemifield. During the letter task, male subjects identified more probes from the left hemifield than from the right. Their accuracy varied little across the two hemifields during the dots task. Experiment 2 tested whether this pattern is due to either spatial attention or interference in character processing. Instead of identifying digits, the probe task required subjects to respond to a black square that appeared in the periphery of the screen. For male subjects, the pattern was opposite of that from Experiment 1. During the letter task they responded faster to the probe in the right hemifield than in the left. Their response times were equivalent across the two hemifields during the dots task.These results indicate two separate effects of laterality in male subjects. The activation of one hemisphere produced more attention to the contralateral hemifield in Experiment 2, and the letter memory task interfered with the processing of other characters in the right visual field more than those in the left visual field in Experiment 1. Neither of these effects appeared in female subjects, corroborating earlier claims that female brains are less lateralized than male brains.

[1]  J. Jonides,et al.  Dissociating verbal and spatial working memory using PET. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Hemispheric control of spatial attention , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[3]  D. Boles,et al.  Factor analysis and the cerebral hemispheres: “Unlocalized” functions , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  M. Bunge Cerebral correlates of conscious experience P. A. Buser & A. Rougeul-Buser (eds) North-Holland, Amsterdam (1978) xii + 364 pp., $47.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[5]  M. P. Bryden,et al.  Laterality: Functional Asymmetry in the Intact Brain , 1982 .

[6]  M. Jeannerod Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. , 1987 .

[7]  J B Hellige,et al.  Effects of concurrent verbal memory on recognition of stimuli from the left and right visual fields. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Alinda Friedman,et al.  Dividing attention within and between hemispheres: testing a multiple resources approach to limited-capacity information processing. , 1982 .

[9]  C D Wickens,et al.  Multiple Resources, Task-Hemispheric Integrity, and Individual Differences in Time-Sharing , 1981, Human factors.

[10]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Variations in attentional bias of the disconnected cerebral hemispheres , 1994 .

[11]  L. Katz,et al.  Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language , 1995, Nature.

[12]  K. Cave,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Marcel Kinsbourne,et al.  Hemispheric disconnection and cerebral function , 1974 .

[14]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Visual selection mediated by location: Feature-based selection of noncontiguous locations , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  M. Kinsbourne Mechanisms of Unilateral Neglect , 1987 .

[16]  S. P. Springer,et al.  Left brain, right brain , 1981 .

[17]  D. Boles Laterally biased attention with concurrent verbal load: Multiple failures to replicate , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  K. Cave,et al.  Spatial Attention in Visual Search for Features and Feature Conjunctions , 1995 .

[19]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Spatial selection via feature-driven inhibition of distractor locations , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  K. Cave,et al.  Flexibility in Spatial Attention Before and After Practice , 1997 .

[21]  C D Wickens,et al.  Principles of S-C-R Compatibility with Spatial and Verbal Tasks: The Role of Display-Control Location and Voice-Interactive Display-Control Interfacing , 1984, Human factors.

[22]  M. P. Bryden,et al.  Handedness and sex differences in hemispheric asymmetry , 1976, Brain and Language.

[23]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A PET study of visuospatial attention , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  David B. Boles,et al.  Factor analysis and the cerebral hemispheres: Pilot study and parietal functions , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  K. Cave,et al.  Grouping effects on spatial attention in visual search. , 1999, The Journal of general psychology.

[26]  M C Polson,et al.  Task-Sharing within and between Hemispheres: A Multiple-Resources Approach , 1988, Human factors.

[27]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Working Memory: A View from Neuroimaging , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  D B Boles,et al.  A simultaneous task comparison of differentiated and undifferentiated hemispheric resource theories. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  D. Halpern Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 1986 .

[30]  M. Posner,et al.  How do the parietal lobes direct covert attention? , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  D. Boles,et al.  Factor analysis and the cerebral hemispheres: Temporal, occipital and frontal functions , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Edward Awh,et al.  Verbal and Spatial Working Memory in Humans , 1996 .

[33]  Jerre Levy Cerebral lateralization and spatial ability , 1976, Behavior genetics.