Modeling Sociotechnical Change in IS with a Quantitative Longitudinal Approach: The PPR Method

The following article suggests a critical realistic framework, which aims at modeling sociotechnical change linked to end-users' IT appropriation: the "archetypal approach." The basic situations it includes (the "sociotechnical archetypes"), and the possible appropriative trajectories that combine them, together with three propositions linked to the model, are developed. They are illustrated by means of a case study describing the implementation of an e-learning system within a French university. Then, the article presents an instrumentation of the theoretical framework, based on a quantitative longitudinal approach: the Process Patterns Recognition (PPR) method. This one draws mainly on Doty, Glick and Huber (1993, 1994), who propose to evaluate the distance between organizational archetypes and empirical configurations by means of Euclidean distance calculus. The adaptation consists of evaluating the distance between appropriative trajectories (embodied by series of theoretically specified vectors) and empirical processes linked to the implementation of computerized tools in organizations. The PPR method is then applied to the same organizational setting as the one related to the case study. It validates the relevance of this type of a research strategy, which makes it possible to model sociotechnical dynamics related to end-users' IT appropriations.

[1]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[2]  Danny Miller,et al.  The Longitudinal Analysis of Organizations: A Methodological Perspective , 1982 .

[3]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations , 1983 .

[4]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Survey Research Methodology in Management Information Systems: An Assessment , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  William H. Glick,et al.  Typologies As a Unique Form Of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling , 1994 .

[6]  Philip J. Dobson.  The SoSM revisited: a critical realist perspective , 2003 .

[7]  S. Nadel.  The Theory of Social Structure , 1957 .

[8]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[9]  Norbert Alter,et al.  Peut-on programmer l'innovation ? , 1995 .

[10]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[11]  Erja Mustonen-Ollila,et al.  Why organizations adopt information system process innovations: a longitudinal study using Diffusion of Innovation theory , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[12]  Evan Koblentz.  How It Started: Mobile Internet Devices of the Previous Millennium , 2009, Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Information Systems Research: A Case Study , 1988, MIS Q..

[14]  Dianne Willis,et al.  The New SocioTech , 2000, Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

[15]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Changing patterns or patterns of change: the effects of a change in technology on social network str , 1990 .

[16]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution , 1997 .

[17]  M. Archer.  Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation , 2003 .

[18]  Angela Lin,et al.  Sociotechnical Perspectives on Emergence Phenomena , 2000 .

[19]  P. Pettit.  The Possibility of Naturalism. , 1981 .

[20]  B. Latour.  Aramis ou L'amour des techniques , 1992 .

[21]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: a longitudinal study , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[22]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Investigating the Research Approaches for Examining Technology Adoption Issues , 2005 .

[23]  Karl Pearson,et al.  ON THE COEFFICIENT OF RACIAL LIKENESS , 1926 .

[24]  F. D. Vaujany.  Les figures de la gestion du changement sociotechnique , 2003 .

[25]  G. Lawrence Sanders,et al.  An Experimental Validation of the Gorry and Scott Morton Framework , 1989, MIS Q..

[26]  E. Trist,et al.  Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting , 1951 .

[27]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[28]  Manuel Acevedo.  Network Cooperation: Development Cooperation in the Network Society , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Hum. Dev..

[29]  John R. Kimberly,et al.  Data Aggregation in Organizational Research: The Temporal Dimension , 1980 .

[30]  Raymond B. Cattell,et al.  rp and other coefficients of pattern similarity , 1949, Psychometrika.

[31]  S. Barley.  The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. , 1990, Administrative science quarterly.

[32]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[33]  Philip J. Dobson.  Critical realism and information systems research: why bother with philosophy? , 2002, Inf. Res..

[34]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[35]  R. Forthofer,et al.  Rank Correlation Methods , 1981 .

[36]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  It's About Time: Temporal Structuring in Organizations , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[37]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Structuring of Genres in Electronic Communication: Reinforcement and Change of Social Interaction , 1999 .

[38]  Alladi Venkatesh,et al.  Longitudinal Surveys in Information Systems Research: An Examination of Issues, Methods, and Applications , 1991 .

[39]  Sven A. Carlsson,et al.  Advancing Information Systems Evaluation (Research): A Critical Realist Approach , 2003 .

[40]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Assessing similarity between profiles. , 1953, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  John R. Kimberly,et al.  Issues in the Design of Longitudinal Organizational Research , 1976 .

[42]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[43]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[44]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  A theory of information systems based on improvisation , 1999 .

[45]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[46]  M. Archer,et al.  Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach , 1997 .

[47]  William H. Glick,et al.  Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories , 1993 .

[48]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  De profundis? Deconstructing the concept of strategic alignment , 1997, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Erja Mustonen-Ollila,et al.  How organizations adopt information system process innovations: a longitudinal analysis , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[50]  C. Osgood,et al.  A measure of relation determined by both mean difference and profile information. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[51]  William Stephenson,et al.  A statistical approach to typology: The study of trait-universes , 1950 .

[52]  Roy Rada,et al.  Modelling Situated Actions in Collaborative Hypertext Databases. , 2006 .

[53]  M. Lessnoff.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[54]  A. Giddens.  Central Problems In Social Theory , 1979 .

[55]  L. Moutinho.  Doing Management Research - a Comprehensive Guide: Thietant, R.-A., et al, (2001), Sage Publishing, 432 pp, £70.00 cloth, £24.00 paperback , 2004 .

[56]  Philip J. Dobson.  Approaches to Theory Use In Interpretive Case Studies - a Critical Realist Perspective , 1999 .

[57]  Mark S. Silver,et al.  User Perceptions of Decision Support System Restrictiveness: An Experiment , 1988, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..