Facilitators and Barriers to Adopting Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Contextualizing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology

Robotic-assisted surgical techniques are not yet well established among surgeon practice groups beyond a few surgical subspecialties. To help identify the facilitators and barriers to their adoption, this belief-elicitation study contextualized and supplemented constructs of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in robotic-assisted surgery. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 21 surgeons comprising two groups: users and nonusers. The main facilitators to adoption were Perceived Usefulness and Facilitating Conditions among both users and nonusers, followed by Attitude Toward Using Technology among users and Extrinsic Motivation among nonusers. The three main barriers to adoption for both users and nonusers were Perceived Ease of Use and Complexity, Perceived Usefulness, and Perceived Behavioral Control. This study's findings can assist surgeons, hospital and medical school administrators, and other policy makers on the proper adoption of robotic-assisted surgery and can guide future research on the development of theories and framing of hypotheses.

[1]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[2]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[3]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[4]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[5]  Lois W. Sayrs Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[6]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[7]  G. Buess,et al.  Robotics and systems technology for advanced endoscopic procedures: experiences in general surgery. , 1999, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[8]  J. Nunamaker Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1999 .

[9]  Peter Caputi,et al.  Issues in predicting and explaining usage behaviors with the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior when usage is mandatory , 2000, ICIS.

[10]  黄亚明 MedScape , 2009 .

[11]  Yasuhide Morikawa,et al.  The revolution of computer-aided surgery - the dawn of robotic surgery. , 2001, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[12]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[13]  Michelle Meadows,et al.  Robots lend a helping hand to surgeons. , 2002, FDA consumer.

[14]  Bringing real life to the table. Patient reps help FDA review products. , 2002, FDA consumer.

[15]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Examining a Model of Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: An Exploratory Study , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Jacob Bergsland,et al.  Survey of Resident Training in Robotic Surgery , 2002, The American surgeon.

[17]  G. Berci,et al.  The operating room of the future: what, when and why? , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[18]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .

[19]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[20]  David B. Camarillo,et al.  Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[21]  Ninh T Nguyen,et al.  Application of Robotics in General Surgery: Initial Experience , 2004, The American surgeon.

[22]  A. Lanfranco,et al.  Robotic Surgery: A Current Perspective , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[23]  J. Marescaux,et al.  Robotic surgery: potentials, barriers, and limitations , 2005, European Surgery.

[24]  L. Giddings Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2d ed , 2005 .

[25]  Eric J Hanly,et al.  Technology in the operating suite. , 2005, JAMA.

[26]  Ahmed Ahdy Haggag Robotic Surgery: When Technology Meets Surgical Precision , 2005 .

[27]  Andrew W Garrison Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education. , 2005, MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine.

[28]  I. Mcleod,et al.  Potential Applications of the da Vinci Minimally Invasive Surgical Robotic System in Otolaryngology , 2005, Ear, nose, & throat journal.

[29]  D. Murphy,et al.  Endoscopic robotic mitral valve surgery. , 2006, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[30]  Lynette M. Smith,et al.  Robotic urological surgery in patients with prior abdominal operations is not associated with increased complications , 2006, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[31]  On the cutting edge of: ROBOTIC SURGERY , 2007, Nursing.

[32]  Laurel Stadtmauer,et al.  Current status of robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in reproductive medicine and gynaecology. , 2007, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[33]  M. Finan,et al.  Overcoming technical challenges with robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[34]  Richard J. Holden,et al.  A theoretical model of health information technology usage behaviour with implications for patient safety , 2009, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[35]  L. Ponsky,et al.  Recent Innovations in Minimally Invasive Surgery and Implications for Gynecology , 2009 .

[36]  Richard J. Holden,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[37]  C. Matthews Applications of robotic surgery in gynecology. , 2010, Journal of women's health.

[38]  G. Fried Emerging Technology in Surgery , 2012 .