The Soft Touch: Low-Affinity Transcription Factor Binding Sites in Development and Evolution.

[1]  Hernan G. Garcia,et al.  Enhancer additivity and non-additivity are determined by enhancer strength in the Drosophila embryo , 2015, eLife.

[2]  J. Delabie,et al.  Comprehensive genome-wide transcription factor analysis reveals that a combination of high affinity and low affinity DNA binding is needed for human gene regulation , 2015, BMC Genomics.

[3]  R. Mann,et al.  Low Affinity Binding Site Clusters Confer Hox Specificity and Regulatory Robustness , 2015, Cell.

[4]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  3D imaging of Sox2 enhancer clusters in embryonic stem cells , 2014, eLife.

[5]  Mikhail Spivakov.  Spurious transcription factor binding: Non-functional or genetically redundant? , 2014, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[6]  Manolis Kellis,et al.  Systematic discovery and characterization of regulatory motifs in ENCODE TF binding experiments , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  Andrea I. Ramos,et al.  Low-affinity transcription factor binding sites shape morphogen responses and enhancer evolution , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Michael D. Wilson,et al.  Cooperativity and Rapid Evolution of Cobound Transcription Factors in Closely Related Mammals , 2013, Cell.

[9]  Laura E. DeMare,et al.  The Evolution of Lineage-Specific Regulatory Activities in the Human Embryonic Limb , 2013, Cell.

[10]  M. Bulyk,et al.  Genomic regions flanking E-box binding sites influence DNA binding specificity of bHLH transcription factors through DNA shape. , 2013, Cell reports.

[11]  James B. Brown,et al.  DNA regions bound at low occupancy by transcription factors do not drive patterned reporter gene expression in Drosophila , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  B. J. Hwang,et al.  Regulatory regions of the C elegans genome contain more low-affinity REF-1 transcription-factor binding sites than high-affinity sites , 2012, Genes & Genomics.

[13]  Data production leads,et al.  An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome , 2012 .

[14]  Raymond K. Auerbach,et al.  An Integrated Encyclopedia of DNA Elements in the Human Genome , 2012, Nature.

[15]  ENCODEConsortium,et al.  An Integrated Encyclopedia of DNA Elements in the Human Genome , 2012, Nature.

[16]  Martha L. Bulyk,et al.  Molecular mechanism underlying the regulatory specificity of a Drosophila homeodomain protein that specifies myoblast identity , 2012, Development.

[17]  Saurabh Sinha,et al.  Evolutionary origins of transcription factor binding site clusters. , 2012, Molecular biology and evolution.

[18]  Antoine M. van Oijen,et al.  Sequence-dependent sliding kinetics of p53 , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  R. Mann,et al.  Cofactor Binding Evokes Latent Differences in DNA Binding Specificity between Hox Proteins , 2011, Cell.

[20]  Martha L Bulyk,et al.  Precise temporal control of the eye regulatory gene Pax6 via enhancer-binding site affinity. , 2010, Genes & development.

[21]  Justin Crocker,et al.  Dynamic evolution of precise regulatory encodings creates the clustered site signature of enhancers , 2010, Nature communications.

[22]  Esther T. Chan,et al.  Conservation and regulatory associations of a wide affinity range of mouse transcription factor binding sites. , 2010, Genomics.

[23]  Lior Pachter,et al.  Binding Site Turnover Produces Pervasive Quantitative Changes in Transcription Factor Binding between Closely Related Drosophila Species , 2010, PLoS biology.

[24]  Guido Tiana,et al.  Noncooperative interactions between transcription factors and clustered DNA binding sites enable graded transcriptional responses to environmental inputs. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[25]  Richard W. Lusk,et al.  Evolutionary Mirages: Selection on Binding Site Composition Creates the Illusion of Conserved Grammars in Drosophila Enhancers , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[26]  L. Mirny,et al.  Different gene regulation strategies revealed by analysis of binding motifs. , 2009, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[27]  Daniel E. Newburger,et al.  Diversity and Complexity in DNA Recognition by Transcription Factors , 2009, Science.

[28]  Daniel E. Newburger,et al.  Variation in Homeodomain DNA Binding Revealed by High-Resolution Analysis of Sequence Preferences , 2008, Cell.

[29]  G. Stormo,et al.  Analysis of Homeodomain Specificities Allows the Family-wide Prediction of Preferred Recognition Sites , 2008, Cell.

[30]  D. W. Knowles,et al.  Transcription Factors Bind Thousands of Active and Inactive Regions in the Drosophila Blastoderm , 2008, PLoS biology.

[31]  E. Segal,et al.  Predicting expression patterns from regulatory sequence in Drosophila segmentation , 2008, Nature.

[32]  Alex A. Pollen,et al.  cis-Regulatory Changes in Kit Ligand Expression and Parallel Evolution of Pigmentation in Sticklebacks and Humans , 2007, Cell.

[33]  J. Elf,et al.  Probing Transcription Factor Dynamics at the Single-Molecule Level in a Living Cell , 2007, Science.

[34]  Amos Tanay,et al.  Extensive low-affinity transcriptional interactions in the yeast genome. , 2006, Genome research.

[35]  David A. Nix,et al.  Large-Scale Turnover of Functional Transcription Factor Binding Sites in Drosophila , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[36]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  A clustering property of highly-degenerate transcription factor binding sites in the mammalian genome , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[37]  John Reinitz,et al.  Bicoid cooperative DNA binding is critical for embryonic patterning in Drosophila. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  J. Fay,et al.  Identification of functional transcription factor binding sites using closely related Saccharomyces species. , 2005, Genome research.

[39]  HipHopDX https.  The East Side Boyz , 2004 .

[40]  J. Brookfield,et al.  Expected rates and modes of evolution of enhancer sequences. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[41]  F. Guillemot,et al.  Direct and concentration-dependent regulation of the proneural gene Neurogenin2 by Pax6 , 2003, Development.

[42]  A. Clark,et al.  Evolution of transcription factor binding sites in Mammalian gene regulatory regions: conservation and turnover. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[43]  S. Mango,et al.  Regulation of Organogenesis by the Caenorhabditis elegans FoxA Protein PHA-4 , 2002, Science.

[44]  Peter W. Markstein,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of clustered Dorsal binding sites identifies putative target genes in the Drosophila embryo , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  J. Stone,et al.  Rapid evolution of cis-regulatory sequences via local point mutations. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[46]  G. Church,et al.  Exploring the DNA-binding specificities of zinc fingers with DNA microarrays , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  H. Kondoh,et al.  Pax6 and SOX2 form a co-DNA-binding partner complex that regulates initiation of lens development. , 2001, Genes & development.

[48]  N. Patel,et al.  Evidence for stabilizing selection in a eukaryotic enhancer element , 2000, Nature.

[49]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Cooperative DNA‐binding by Bicoid provides a mechanism for threshold‐dependent gene activation in the Drosophila embryo , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[50]  E. Davidson,et al.  The hardwiring of development: organization and function of genomic regulatory systems. , 1997, Development.

[51]  R E Glass,et al.  Visualization of single molecules of RNA polymerase sliding along DNA. , 1993, Science.

[52]  Michael Levine,et al.  Binding affinities and cooperative interactions with bHLH activators delimit threshold responses to the dorsal gradient morphogen , 1993, Cell.

[53]  D. Crothers,et al.  Sliding and intermolecular transfer of the lac repressor: kinetic perturbation of a reaction intermediate by a distant DNA sequence. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  Wolfgang Driever,et al.  Determination of spatial domains of zygotic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo by the affinity of binding sites for the bicoid morphogen , 1989, Nature.

[55]  P. V. von Hippel,et al.  Selection of DNA binding sites by regulatory proteins. , 1988, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[56]  M Ptashne,et al.  Cooperative DNA binding of the yeast transcriptional activator GAL4. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  P. V. von Hippel,et al.  Selection of DNA binding sites by regulatory proteins. Statistical-mechanical theory and application to operators and promoters. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[58]  R. Tjian,et al.  Activation of transcription by two factors that bind promoter and enhancer sequences of the human metallothionein gene and SV40 , 1987, Nature.

[59]  M. Ptashne,et al.  How λ repressor and λ Cro distinguish between OR1 and OR3 , 1986, Cell.

[60]  P. Chambon,et al.  Cell-type specific protein binding to the enhancer of simian virus 40 in nuclear extracts , 1986, Nature.

[61]  J. Banerji,et al.  Expression of a β-globin gene is enhanced by remote SV40 DNA sequences , 1981, Cell.

[62]  J. Banerji,et al.  Expression of a beta-globin gene is enhanced by remote SV40 DNA sequences. , 1981, Cell.