Predicting moment-to-moment attentional state

Although fluctuations in sustained attention are ubiquitous, most psychological experiments treat them as noise, averaging performance over many trials. The current study uses multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) to decode whether, on each trial of a cognitive task, participants are in an optimal or suboptimal attentional state. During fMRI, participants performed n-back tasks, composed of central face images overlaid on distractor scenes, with low, perceptual, and working memory load. Instructions were to respond to novel faces and withhold response to rare repeats. To index attentional state, reaction time variability was calculated at each correct response. Participants' 50% least variable trials were labeled optimal, or "in the zone," and their 50% most erratic trials were labeled suboptimal, or "out of the zone." Support vector machine classifiers trained on activity in the default mode network (DMN), dorsal attention network (DAN), and task-relevant fusiform face area (FFA) distinguished in-the-zone and out-of-the-zone trials in all tasks. Consistent with evidence that distractors are processed when central task load is low, parahippocampal place area (PPA) classifiers were only successful in the low load task. Classification in anatomical regions across the brain revealed widespread coding of attentional state. In contrast to these robust pattern analyses, univariate signal in DMN, DAN, FFA, and PPA did not distinguish states, suggesting a nuanced relationship to sustained attention. In sum, MVPA can be used to decode trial-by-trial attentional state throughout much of cortex, helping to characterize how attention network fluctuations correlate with performance variability.

[1]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  C M Pollock,et al.  The influence of sustained attention on railway accidents. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  When sustained attention impairs perception , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Jonathan S. A. Carriere,et al.  Absent-mindedness: Lapses of conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[5]  Jérôme Prado,et al.  Heightened interactions between a key default-mode region and a key task-positive region are linked to suboptimal current performance but to enhanced future performance , 2011, NeuroImage.

[6]  James C. Duchon,et al.  A Safety Risk Evaluation of Vigilance Tasks in the U.S. Surface Mining Industry , 1988 .

[7]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  R. Barkley Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  K. Christoff,et al.  Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  R W Cox,et al.  Software tools for analysis and visualization of fMRI data , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[11]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Default network activity, coupled with the frontoparietal control network, supports goal-directed cognition , 2010, NeuroImage.

[12]  R. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal–cingulate interactions in action monitoring , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  D. Stuss,et al.  Staying on the job: the frontal lobes control individual performance variability. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  D. Braff Information processing and attention dysfunctions in schizophrenia. , 1993, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[15]  Michael Esterman,et al.  Intrinsic Fluctuations in Sustained Attention and Distractor Processing , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  A. Carr,et al.  Reaction time impairment in schizophrenia and affective illness: The role of attention , 1989, Biological Psychiatry.

[17]  Julie D. Golomb,et al.  A taxonomy of external and internal attention. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Intrinsic Architecture Underlying the Relations among the Default, Dorsal Attention, and Frontoparietal Control Networks of the Human Brain , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Lapses in a Prefrontal-Extrastriate Preparatory Attention Network Predict Mistakes , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  Competition between functional brain networks mediates behavioral variability , 2008, NeuroImage.

[22]  N. Lavie Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Jérôme Prado,et al.  Variations of response time in a selective attention task are linked to variations of functional connectivity in the attentional network , 2011, NeuroImage.

[24]  Stewart Mostofsky,et al.  Jitter Reduces Response-Time Variability in ADHD , 2015, Journal of attention disorders.

[25]  Daeyeol Lee,et al.  Ubiquity and Specificity of Reinforcement Signals throughout the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[26]  I. Robertson,et al.  `Oops!': Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Stewart H Mostofsky,et al.  Interstimulus jitter facilitates response control in children with ADHD , 2009, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[28]  Sylvain Arlot,et al.  A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection , 2009, 0907.4728.

[29]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Intraindividual variability in cognitive performance in older adults: comparison of adults with mild dementia, adults with arthritis, and healthy adults. , 2000, Neuropsychology.

[30]  M. Rosenberg,et al.  In the zone or zoning out? Tracking behavioral and neural fluctuations during sustained attention. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Distributed and Antagonistic Contributions of Ongoing Activity Fluctuations to Auditory Stimulus Detection , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  Mind-wandering with and without awareness: An fMRI study of spontaneous thought processes , 2006 .

[33]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Stewart H Mostofsky,et al.  Moderate variability in stimulus presentation improves motor response control , 2009, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[35]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought , 2007, Science.

[37]  G. Woodman,et al.  Neural fate of ignored stimuli: dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  Michael Esterman,et al.  Sustaining visual attention in the face of distraction: a novel gradual-onset continuous performance task , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[39]  Andrew B Leber,et al.  Neural Predictors of Within-Subject Fluctuations in Attentional Control , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Kristina M. Visscher,et al.  The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  S. Luck,et al.  The Construct of Attention in Schizophrenia , 2008, Biological Psychiatry.

[42]  D. Stuss,et al.  Reaction time after head injury: fatigue, divided and focused attention, and consistency of performance. , 1989, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[43]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Just Say No: How Are Visual Searches Terminated When There Is No Target Present? , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[44]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Hiroki M. Morimoto,et al.  Functional dissociation in right inferior frontal cortex during performance of go/no-go task. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Closed-loop training of attention with real-time brain imaging , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  Donald T. Stuss,et al.  Characterization of stability of performance in patients with traumatic brain injury: Variability and consistency on reaction time tests. , 1994 .

[48]  Brian S Caffo,et al.  fMRI of intrasubject variability in ADHD: anomalous premotor activity with prefrontal compensation. , 2008, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[49]  Jin Fan,et al.  Event‐Related fMRI of Inhibitory Control in the Predominantly Inattentive and Combined Subtypes of ADHD , 2009, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[50]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Neural underpinnings of within-person variability in cognitive functioning. , 2009, Psychology and aging.

[51]  J. Vasterling,et al.  Attention and memory dysfunction in posttraumatic stress disorder. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[52]  M. Bellgrove,et al.  The functional neuroanatomical correlates of response variability: evidence from a response inhibition task , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  Sharon L. Thompson-Schill,et al.  The advantage of brief fMRI acquisition runs for multi-voxel pattern detection across runs , 2012, NeuroImage.

[54]  Stephan Bender,et al.  Intra-individual reaction time variability in schizophrenia, depression and borderline personality disorder , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[55]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Intra-individual variability in behavior: links to brain structure, neurotransmission and neuronal activity , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[56]  F. Castellanos,et al.  Characterizing cognition in ADHD: beyond executive dysfunction , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.