Strongly lateralized activation in language fMRI of atypical dominant patients—Implications for presurgical work-up

PURPOSE Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is being used increasingly for language dominance assessment in the presurgical work-up of patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy. However, the interpretation of bilateral fMRI-activation patterns is difficult. Various studies propose fMRI-lateralization index (LI) thresholds between +/-0.1 and +/-0.5 for discrimination of atypical from typical dominant patients. This study examines if these thresholds allow identifying atypical dominant patients with sufficient safety for presurgical settings. METHODS 65 patients had a tight comparison, fully controlled semantic decision fMRI-task and a Wada-test for language lateralization. According to Wada-test, 22 were atypical language dominant. In the remaining, Wada-test results were compatible with unilateral left dominance. We determined fMRI-LI for two frontal and one temporo-parietal functionally defined, protocol-specific volume of interest (VOI), and for the least lateralized of these VOIs ("low-VOI") in each patient. RESULTS We find large intra-individual LI differences between functionally defined VOIs irrespective of underlying type of language dominance (mean LI difference 0.33+/-0.35, range 0-1.6; 15% of patients have inter-VOI-LI differences >1.0). Across atypical dominant patients fMRI-LI in the Broca's and temporo-parietal VOI range from -1 to +1, in the "remaining frontal" VOI from -0.93 to 1. The highest low-VOI-LI detected in atypical dominant patients is 0.84. CONCLUSIONS Large intra-individual inter-VOI-LI differences and strongly lateralized fMRI-activation in patients with Wada-test proven atypical dominance question the value of the proposed fMRI-thresholds for presurgical language lateralization. Future studies have to develop strategies allowing the reliable identification of atypical dominance with fMRI. The low-VOI approach may be useful.

[1]  Guillén Fernández,et al.  Left hippocampal pathology is associated with atypical language lateralization in patients with focal epilepsy. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  J. A. Frost,et al.  Language dominance in neurologically normal and epilepsy subjects , 1999 .

[3]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of language dominance in children and adolescents with functional MRI , 1997, Neurology.

[4]  J. A. Frost,et al.  Determination of language dominance using functional MRI , 1996, Neurology.

[5]  C. Helmstaedter Neuropsychological aspects of epilepsy surgery , 2004, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[6]  B. Abou-Khalil An Update on Determination of Language Dominance in Screening for Epilepsy Surgery: The Wada Test and Newer Noninvasive Alternatives , 2007, Epilepsia.

[7]  S. H. A. Chen,et al.  Ethical issues in the clinical application of fMRI: Factors affecting the validity and interpretation of activations , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[8]  J. E Adcock,et al.  Quantitative fMRI assessment of the differences in lateralization of language-related brain activation in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy , 2003, NeuroImage.

[9]  Anthony M. Murro,et al.  Cerebral language lateralization: Evidence from intracarotid amobarbital testing , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  E. T. Possing,et al.  Use of preoperative functional neuroimaging to predict language deficits from epilepsy surgery , 2003, Neurology.

[11]  T. L. Davis,et al.  Language dominance determined by whole brain functional MRI in patients with brain lesions , 1999, Neurology.

[12]  F. Mormann,et al.  Presurgical Language fMRI in Patients with Drug‐resistant Epilepsy: Effects of Task Performance , 2006, Epilepsia.

[13]  E. T. Possing,et al.  Language lateralization in left-handed and ambidextrous people: fMRI data , 2002, Neurology.

[14]  M. Smith,et al.  Factors associated with atypical speech representation in children with intractable epilepsy , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  C. Elger,et al.  Unilateral Intracarotid Amobarbital Procedure for Language Lateralization , 2005, Epilepsia.

[16]  J. B. Demb,et al.  Functional MRI measurement of language lateralization in Wada-tested patients. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  Guillén Fernández,et al.  Language Mapping in Less Than 15 Minutes: Real-Time Functional MRI during Routine Clinical Investigation , 2001, NeuroImage.

[18]  N. F. Ramsey,et al.  Reproducibility of fMRI-Determined Language Lateralization in Individual Subjects , 2002, Brain and Language.

[19]  N. F. Ramsey,et al.  Combined Analysis of Language Tasks in fMRI Improves Assessment of Hemispheric Dominance for Language Functions in Individual Subjects , 2001, NeuroImage.

[20]  D Le Bihan,et al.  Functional MR evaluation of temporal and frontal language dominance compared with the Wada test , 2000, Neurology.

[21]  B. Devaux,et al.  Functional MR Imaging in Assessment of Language Dominance in Epileptic Patients , 2003 .

[22]  Stefan Knecht,et al.  The assessment of hemispheric lateralization in functional MRI—Robustness and reproducibility , 2006, NeuroImage.

[23]  J. Kassubek,et al.  Determination of hemisphere dominance for language: comparison of frontal and temporal fMRI activation with intracarotid amytal testing , 2002, Neuroradiology.

[24]  John A Detre,et al.  fMRI: Applications in Epilepsy , 2004, Epilepsia.

[25]  J. A. Frost,et al.  Conceptual Processing during the Conscious Resting State: A Functional MRI Study , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  B. Bernal,et al.  Functional MR imaging versus Wada test for evaluation of language lateralization: cost analysis. , 2004, Radiology.

[27]  C. E. Elger,et al.  Patterns of Language Dominance in Focal Left and Right Hemisphere Epilepsies: Relation to MRI Findings, EEG, Sex, and Age at Onset of Epilepsy , 1997, Brain and Cognition.

[28]  J. Schramm,et al.  Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Patterns of Cerebral Language Dominance An Amobarbital Study , 1994, Brain and Language.

[29]  J. Fell,et al.  Intrasubject reproducibility of presurgical language lateralization and mapping using fMRI , 2003, Neurology.

[30]  T. Rasmussen,et al.  INTRACAROTID INJECTION OF SODIUM AMYTAL FOR THE LATERALIZATION OF CEREBRAL SPEECH DOMINANCE EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS , 1960 .

[31]  D. W Loring,et al.  Now you see it, now you don’t: statistical and methodological considerations in fMRI , 2002, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[32]  D. Gadian,et al.  Language reorganization in children with early-onset lesions of the left hemisphere: an fMRI study. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  P. Matthews,et al.  Effective Paradigm Design , 2001 .

[34]  F. Woermann,et al.  Language lateralization by Wada test and fMRI in 100 patients with epilepsy , 2003, Neurology.

[35]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Language dominance assessment by means of fMRI: Contributions from task design, performance, and stimulus modality , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.