The Effect of Variable Gradients on Pacing in Cycling Time-Trials

It has been reported that performance in cycling time-trials is enhanced when power is varied in response to gradient although such a mechanical pacing strategy has never been confirmed experimentally in the field. The aim of this study was, therefore, to assess the efficacy of mechanical pacing by comparing a constant power strategy of 255 W with a variable power strategy that averaged to 255 W over an undulating time-trial course. 20 experienced cyclists completed 4 trials over a 4 km course with 2 trials at an average constant power of 253 W and 2 trials where power was varied in response to gradient and averaged 260 W. Time normalised to 255 W was 411±31.1 s for the constant power output trials and 399±29.5 s for the variable power output trials. The variable power output strategy therefore reduced completion time by 12±8 s (2.9%) which was significant ( P<0.001). Participants experienced difficulty in applying a constant power strategy over an undulating course which acted to reduce their time gain. It is concluded that a variable power strategy can improve cycling performance in a field time-trial where the gradient is not constant.

[1]  D. Swain A model for optimizing cycling performance by varying power on hills and in wind. , 1997, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  T D Noakes,et al.  Effects of steady-state versus stochastic exercise on subsequent cycling performance. , 1997, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  G Atkinson,et al.  Pacing strategies during a cycling time trial with simulated headwinds and tailwinds , 2000, Ergonomics.

[4]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  A Handbook of Statistical Analysis Using R , 1997, Technometrics.

[5]  A. Edwards,et al.  Self-paced exercise is less physically challenging than enforced constant pace exercise of the same intensity: influence of complex central metabolic control , 2009, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[6]  James C Martin,et al.  Validation of a Mathematical Model for Road Cycling Power. , 1998, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[7]  S Duc,et al.  Validity and Reliability of the PowerTap Mobile Cycling Powermeter when Compared with the SRM Device , 2005, International journal of sports medicine.

[8]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Variable versus constant power strategies during cycling time-trials: Prediction of time savings using an up-to-date mathematical model , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[9]  G Atkinson,et al.  International Journal of Sports Medicine – Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research , 2009, International journal of sports medicine.

[10]  K. Berg,et al.  Pacing Pattern in a 30-Minute Maximal Cycling Test , 2008, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[11]  G Atkinson,et al.  Acceptability of Power Variation during a Simulated Hilly Time Trial , 2006, International journal of sports medicine.

[12]  M. Batey A handbook of statistical analyses using SPSS. Sabe Landau, Brian S. Everitt, Chapman and Hall/CRC. 2003. £25.99 (pbk) ISBN 1584883693 , 2006 .

[13]  Scott Gordon,et al.  Optimising distribution of power during a cycling time trial , 2005 .

[14]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Science and cycling: current knowledge and future directions for research , 2003, Journal of sports sciences.

[15]  David P. Swain,et al.  Physiological effects of constant versus variable power during endurance cycling. , 1998 .

[16]  W G Hopkins,et al.  Ergometer error and biological variation in power output in a performance test with three cycle ergometers. , 2006, International journal of sports medicine.