Development and validation of a modelling framework for simulating 2D-mammography and breast tomosynthesis images

Planar 2D x-ray mammography is generally accepted as the preferred screening technique used for breast cancer detection. Recently, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has been introduced to overcome some of the inherent limitations of conventional planar imaging, and future technological enhancements are expected to result in the introduction of further innovative modalities. However, it is crucial to understand the impact of any new imaging technology or methodology on cancer detection rates and patient recall. Any such assessment conventionally requires large scale clinical trials demanding significant investment in time and resources. The concept of virtual clinical trials and virtual performance assessment may offer a viable alternative to this approach. However, virtual approaches require a collection of specialized modelling tools which can be used to emulate the image acquisition process and simulate images of a quality indistinguishable from their real clinical counterparts. In this paper, we present two image simulation chains constructed using modelling tools that can be used for the evaluation of 2D-mammography and DBT systems. We validate both approaches by comparing simulated images with real images acquired using the system being simulated. A comparison of the contrast-to-noise ratios and image blurring for real and simulated images of test objects shows good agreement ( < 9% error). This suggests that our simulation approach is a promising alternative to conventional physical performance assessment followed by large scale clinical trials.

[1]  Sabine Siesling,et al.  Recent trends of cancer in Europe: a combined approach of incidence, survival and mortality for 17 cancer sites since the 1990s. , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[2]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Optimization of the acquisition geometry in digital tomosynthesis of the breast. , 2009, Medical physics.

[3]  H Bosmans,et al.  Measurements of system sharpness for two digital breast tomosynthesis systems , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Kenneth C. Young,et al.  Predicting contrast detail performance from objective measurements in digital mammography , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[5]  Michael P. Kempston,et al.  Resolution at oblique incidence angles of a flat panel imager for breast tomosynthesis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[6]  D R Dance,et al.  Simulation and assessment of realistic breast lesions using fractal growth models , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  D. M. Parkin,et al.  Use of Statistics to Assess the Global Burden of Breast Cancer , 2006, The breast journal.

[8]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  A Modelling Framework for Evaluation of 2D-Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis Systems , 2012, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[9]  Kenneth C. Young,et al.  Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system. , 2012, Medical physics.

[10]  Bo Zhao,et al.  A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system. , 2007, Medical physics.

[11]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography. , 2012, Medical physics.

[12]  Federica Zanca,et al.  Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study. , 2012, Radiology.

[13]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system. , 2008, Medical physics.

[14]  John M Boone,et al.  Methodology for generating a 3D computerized breast phantom from empirical data. , 2009, Medical physics.

[15]  D R Dance,et al.  Validation of simulation of calcifications for observer studies in digital mammography , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  R. Siddon Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dimensional CT array. , 1985, Medical physics.

[17]  D R Dance,et al.  Estimation of scattered radiation in digital breast tomosynthesis , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  XCOM : Photon Cross Sections Database , 2005 .

[19]  Kenneth C. Young,et al.  A fast scatter field estimator for digital breast tomosynthesis , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[20]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images. , 2003, Medical physics.

[21]  K Bliznakova,et al.  A three-dimensional breast software phantom for mammography simulation. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: inherent spatial resolution. , 1995, Medical physics.

[23]  Aruna A. Vedula,et al.  A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging. , 2006, Medical physics.

[24]  Kenneth C. Young,et al.  Breast Cancer: Advances in X-ray mammography , 2010 .

[25]  Alaleh Rashidnasab,et al.  Simulation of 3D DLA masses in digital breast tomosynthesis , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[26]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[27]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Development and characterization of an anthropomorphic breast software phantom based upon region-growing algorithm. , 2011, Medical physics.

[28]  T. R. Fewell,et al.  Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography. , 1997, Medical physics.

[29]  Kenneth C. Young,et al.  Converting One Set of Mammograms to Simulate a Range of Detector Imaging Characteristics for Observer Studies , 2012, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[30]  H. Bosmans,et al.  The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis. , 2011, Medical physics.

[31]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  A virtual trial framework for quantifying the detectability of masses in breast tomosynthesis projection data. , 2013, Medical physics.

[32]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Robust breast composition measurement - Volpara™ , 2010 .

[33]  Andriy I. Bandos,et al.  Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. , 2013, Radiology.

[34]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[35]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Robust Breast Composition Measurement - VolparaTM , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[36]  E Shaheen,et al.  Simulation of 3D objects into breast tomosynthesis images. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[37]  S. Glick,et al.  Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2009, Medical physics.

[38]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.