Prediction of the Parkinsonian subthalamic nucleus spike activity from local field potentials using nonlinear dynamic models

Extracellular recordings in the area of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) of Parkinson's disease patients undergoing deep brain stimulation comprise fast events, Action Potentials and slower events, known as Local Field Potentials (LFP). The LFP is believed to represent the synchronized input into the observed area, as opposed to the spike data, which represents the output. We have shown before that there is an input-output relationship between these two components in the STN. In the present paper, we extend these observations by using LFP-driven Volterra models and the Laguerre expansion technique to estimate nonlinear dynamic models which are able to predict the recorded spiking activity. To this end, we rigorously examine the optimal model order. The improved performance of the second-order Volterra models indicates that there is a nonlinear relationship between the LFP and the spiking activity. To obtain a more compact and readily interpretable model, the most significant dynamic components of the identified Volterra models are extracted using principal dynamic mode analysis.

[1]  Georgios D. Mitsis,et al.  The Volterra-Wiener approach in neuronal modeling , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Konstantina S. Nikita,et al.  Can we infer subthalamic nucleus spike trains from intranuclear local field potentials? , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[3]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Theta oscillations in somata and dendrites of hippocampal pyramidal cells in vivo: Activity‐dependent phase‐precession of action potentials , 1998, Hippocampus.

[4]  V. Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Modeling of Nonlinear Physiological Systems with Fast and Slow Dynamics. I. Methodology , 2002, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Vasilis Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Modeling of Physiological Systems: Marmarelis/Nonlinear , 2004 .

[6]  R. Quian Quiroga,et al.  Unsupervised Spike Detection and Sorting with Wavelets and Superparamagnetic Clustering , 2004, Neural Computation.

[7]  V. Marmarelis Modeling methology for nonlinear physiological systems , 1997, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Martin A. Riedmiller,et al.  Rprop - Description and Implementation Details , 1994 .

[9]  U. Mitzdorf Properties of the evoked potential generators: current source-density analysis of visually evoked potentials in the cat cortex. , 1987, The International journal of neuroscience.

[10]  Konstantina S. Nikita,et al.  Prediction of the Timing and the Rhythm of the Parkinsonian Subthalamic Nucleus Neural Spikes Using the Local Field Potentials , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[11]  P. Krack,et al.  Deep-brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus or the pars interna of the globus pallidus in Parkinson's disease. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  H. Vaughan,et al.  Averaged multiple unit activity as an estimate of phasic changes in local neuronal activity: effects of volume-conducted potentials , 1980, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  Konstantina S. Nikita,et al.  Toward relating the subthalamic nucleus spiking activity to the local field potentials acquired intranuclearly , 2011 .

[14]  V. Marmarelis Identification of nonlinear biological systems using laguerre expansions of kernels , 1993, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Georgios D. Mitsis,et al.  Principal dynamic mode analysis of action potential firing in a spider mechanoreceptor , 2007, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  Vasilis Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Modeling of Physiological Systems , 2004 .