Evolution in Silico and in Vitro: The RNA Model

Abstract Theoretical concepts and experiments dealing with the evolution of molecules in vitro reached a state that allows for direct applications to the design of biomolecules with predefined properties. RNA evolution in vitro represents a basis for the development of a new and comprehensive model of evolution, focusing on the phenotype and its fitness relevant properties. Relations between genotypes and phenotypes are described by mappings from genotype space onto a space of phenotypes, which are manytoone and thus give ample room for neutrality as expressed by the existence of extended neutral networks in genotype space. The RNA model reduces genotypephenotype relations to mappings from sequences into secondary structures of minimal free energies and allows for derivation of otherwise inaccessible quantitative results. Continuity and discontinuity in evolution are defined through a new notion of accessibility in phenotype space that provides a basis for straightforward interpretation of computer simulations on RNA optimization; furthermore, it reveals the constructive role of random genomic drift in the search for phenotypes of higher fitness. The effects of population size on the course of evolutionary optimization can be predicted quantitatively by means of a simple stochastic model based on a birthanddeath process with immigration.

[1]  R A Goldstein,et al.  Why are some proteins structures so common? , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  P. Schuster,et al.  Statistics of RNA secondary structures , 1993, Biopolymers.

[3]  P. Schuster,et al.  IR-98-039 / April Continuity in Evolution : On the Nature of Transitions , 1998 .

[4]  Peter F. Stadler,et al.  Fitness landscapes arising from the sequence-structure maps of biopolymers , 1999 .

[5]  T. Jukes,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 2000, Genetics.

[6]  D. Gillespie.  Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[7]  P. Schuster,et al.  Shaping space: the possible and the attainable in RNA genotype-phenotype mapping. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  P. Schuster,et al.  A computer model of evolutionary optimization. , 1987, Biophysical chemistry.

[9]  M. Eigen,et al.  The hypercycle. A principle of natural self-organization. Part A: Emergence of the hypercycle. , 1977, Die Naturwissenschaften.

[10]  R A Goldstein,et al.  Evolution of model proteins on a foldability landscape , 1997, Proteins.

[11]  Richard A. Goldstein,et al.  The Foldability Landscape Of , 1997 .

[12]  J. Drake.  A constant rate of spontaneous mutation in DNA-based microbes. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Gerald F. Joyce,et al.  A ribozyme that lacks cytidine , 1999, Nature.

[14]  W. Fontana,et al.  Plasticity, evolvability, and modularity in RNA. , 2000, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[15]  Batey,et al.  Tertiary Motifs in RNA Structure and Folding. , 1999, Angewandte Chemie.

[16]  N. Wingreen,et al.  Emergence of Preferred Structures in a Simple Model of Protein Folding , 1996, Science.

[17]  D. Gillespie.  A General Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1976 .

[18]  R A Goldstein,et al.  The foldability landscape of model proteins , 1997, Biopolymers.

[19]  G. F. Joyce,et al.  Directed evolution of an RNA enzyme. , 1992, Science.

[20]  D. Bartel,et al.  One sequence, two ribozymes: implications for the emergence of new ribozyme folds. , 2000, Science.

[21]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .

[22]  P. Schuster,et al.  From sequences to shapes and back: a case study in RNA secondary structures , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  A. T. Perrotta,et al.  A toggle duplex in hepatitis delta virus self-cleaving RNA that stabilizes an inactive and a salt-dependent pro-active ribozyme conformation. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  J. L. King,et al.  Non-Darwinian evolution. , 1969, Science.

[25]  M. Huynen,et al.  Smoothness within ruggedness: the role of neutrality in adaptation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  D. Bartel,et al.  Isolation of new ribozymes from a large pool of random sequences [see comment]. , 1993, Science.

[27]  M. Waterman,et al.  RNA secondary structure: a complete mathematical analysis , 1978 .

[28]  S. Gavrilets.  Evolution and speciation on holey adaptive landscapes. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  P. Schuster,et al.  Generic properties of combinatory maps: neutral networks of RNA secondary structures. , 1997, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[30]  P. Schuster,et al.  Analysis of RNA sequence structure maps by exhaustive enumeration I. Neutral networks , 1995 .

[31]  W Arber,et al.  Genomic evolution during a 10,000-generation experiment with bacteria. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Anthony D. Keefe,et al.  Functional proteins from a random-sequence library , 2001, Nature.

[33]  J. Szostak,et al.  In vitro selection of functional nucleic acids. , 1999, Annual review of biochemistry.

[34]  P. Stadler,et al.  Neutral networks in protein space: a computational study based on knowledge-based potentials of mean force. , 1997, Folding & design.

[35]  Walter Fontana,et al.  Fast folding and comparison of RNA secondary structures , 1994 .

[36]  Manfred Eigen,et al.  Evolutionary molecular engineering based on RNA replication , 1984 .

[37]  P. Stadler.  Landscapes and their correlation functions , 1996 .

[38]  E. Domingo,et al.  RNA virus mutations and fitness for survival. , 1997, Annual review of microbiology.

[39]  Schuster,et al.  Physical aspects of evolutionary optimization and adaptation. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[40]  P. Higgs.  RNA secondary structure: physical and computational aspects , 2000, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[41]  J W Szostak,et al.  Structurally complex and highly active RNA ligases derived from random RNA sequences. , 1995, Science.

[42]  G. Wagner,et al.  Population dependent Fourier decomposition of fitness landscapes over recombination spaces: Evolvability of complex characters , 2000, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[43]  G. Schwarz,et al.  Re: Manfred Eigen's 70th birthday. , 1997, Biophysical chemistry.

[44]  Michael Zuker,et al.  Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information , 1981, Nucleic Acids Res..

[45]  Ronald R. Breaker,et al.  In Vitro Selection of Catalytic Polynucleotides. , 1997, Chemical reviews.

[46]  Richard W. Hamming,et al.  Error detecting and error correcting codes , 1950 .

[47]  R. Lenski,et al.  Punctuated Evolution Caused by Selection of Rare Beneficial Mutations , 1996, Science.

[48]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Fast algorithm for predicting the secondary structure of single-stranded RNA. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  G. F. Joyce,et al.  In vitro evolution of nucleic acids. , 1994, Current opinion in structural biology.

[50]  C V Forst,et al.  Replication and mutation on neutral networks , 2001, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[51]  S. Spiegelman,et al.  An approach to the experimental analysis of precellular evolution , 1971, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[52]  P. Schuster,et al.  Analysis of RNA sequence structure maps by exhaustive enumeration II. Structures of neutral networks and shape space covering , 1996 .