Time Variation of Effective Climate Sensitivity in GCMs

Abstract Effective climate sensitivity is often assumed to be constant (if uncertain), but some previous studies of general circulation model (GCM) simulations have found it varying as the simulation progresses. This complicates the fitting of simple models to such simulations, as well as having implications for the estimation of climate sensitivity from observations. This study examines the evolution of the feedbacks determining the climate sensitivity in GCMs submitted to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. Apparent centennial-time-scale variations of effective climate sensitivity during stabilization to a forcing can be considered an artifact of using conventional forcings, which only allow for instantaneous effects and stratospheric adjustment. If the forcing is adjusted for processes occurring on time scales that are short compared to the climate stabilization time scale, then there is little centennial-time-scale evolution of effective climate sensitivity in any of the GCMs. Here it is sugges...

[1]  Manoj Joshi,et al.  An alternative to radiative forcing for estimating the relative importance of climate change mechanisms , 2003 .

[2]  S. Klein,et al.  GFDL's CM2 Global Coupled Climate Models. Part I: Formulation and Simulation Characteristics , 2006 .

[3]  Michel Crucifix,et al.  The new hadley centre climate model (HadGEM1) : Evaluation of coupled simulations , 2006 .

[4]  S. Bony,et al.  Combining ERBE and ISCCP data to assess clouds in the Hadley Centre, ECMWF and LMD atmospheric climate models , 2001 .

[5]  J. Murphy.  Transient Response of the Hadley Centre Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model to Increasing Carbon Dioxide. Part III: Analysis of Global-Mean Response Using Simple Models , 1995 .

[6]  D. Randall,et al.  Climate models and their evaluation , 2007 .

[7]  W. Rossow,et al.  Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP , 1999 .

[8]  Climate sensitivity and climate state , 2003 .

[9]  Leonard A. Smith,et al.  Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases , 2005, Nature.

[10]  G. Boer,et al.  Dynamical aspects of climate sensitivity , 2003 .

[11]  G. Martin,et al.  The Physical Properties of the Atmosphere in the New Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model (HadGEM1). Part I: Model Description and Global Climatology , 2006 .

[12]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models , 1990 .

[13]  M. Webb,et al.  Tropospheric Adjustment Induces a Cloud Component in CO2 Forcing , 2008 .

[14]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The time‐dependence of climate sensitivity , 2000 .

[15]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[16]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity , 2004 .

[17]  J. Hack,et al.  Diagnostic study of climate feedback processes in atmospheric general circulation models , 1994 .

[18]  V. Pope,et al.  The impact of new physical parametrizations in the Hadley Centre climate model: HadAM3 , 2000 .

[19]  Luca Bonaventura,et al.  The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM 5. PART I: Model description , 2003 .

[20]  Brian J. Soden,et al.  Quantifying Climate Feedbacks Using Radiative Kernels , 2008 .

[21]  Hiroyasu Hasumi,et al.  K-1 Coupled GCM (MIROC) Description , 2004 .

[22]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments , 2000 .

[23]  G. Boer,et al.  Climate sensitivity and response , 2003 .

[24]  F. Lambert,et al.  Tropospheric adjustment: The response of two general circulation models to a change in insolation , 2007 .

[25]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The second Hadley Centre coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM: model description, spinup and validation , 1997 .

[26]  V. Canuto,et al.  Present-Day Atmospheric Simulations Using GISS ModelE: Comparison to In Situ, Satellite, and Reanalysis Data , 2006 .

[27]  I. Musat,et al.  Evaluation of a component of the cloud response to climate change in an intercomparison of climate models , 2006 .

[28]  M. Webb,et al.  Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations , 2004, Nature.

[29]  S. Klein,et al.  Validation and Sensitivities of Frontal Clouds Simulated by the ECMWF Model , 1999 .

[30]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  Transient Climate Change in the Hadley Centre Models: The Role of Physical Processes , 2001 .

[31]  A. Jones,et al.  The response of the climate system to the indirect effects of anthropogenic sulfate aerosol , 2001 .

[32]  Anthony J. Broccoli,et al.  On the Use of Cloud Forcing to Estimate Cloud Feedback , 2004 .

[33]  Piers M. Forster,et al.  CO2 forcing induces semi‐direct effects with consequences for climate feedback interpretations , 2008 .

[34]  Larry W. Thomason,et al.  Climate forcings in Goddard Institute for Space Studies SI2000 simulations , 2002 .

[35]  W. Collins,et al.  The Community Climate System Model Version 3 (CCSM3) , 2006 .

[36]  Stefano Schiavon,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. , 2007 .

[37]  James J. Hack,et al.  The Climate Sensitivity of the Community Climate System Model Version 3 (CCSM3) , 2006 .