On the intonation of sinusoidal sentences: contour and pitch height.

A sinusoidal replica of a sentence evokes a clear impression of intonation despite the absence of the primary acoustic correlate of intonation, the fundamental frequency. Our previous studies employed a test of differential similarity to determine that the tone analog of the first formant is a probable acoustic correlate of sinusoidal sentence intonation. Though the typical acoustic and perceptual effects of the fundamental frequency and the first formant differ greatly, our finding was anticipated by reports that harmonics of the fundamental within the dominance region provide the basis for impressions of pitch more generally. The frequency extent of the dominance region roughly matches the range of variability typical of the first formant. Here, we report two additional tests with sinusoidal replicas to identify the relevant physical attributes of the first formant analog that figure in the perception of intonation. These experiments determined (1) that listeners represent sinusoidal intonation as a pattern of relative pitch changes correlated with the frequency of the tonal replica of the first formant, and (2) that sinusoidal sentence intonation is probably a close match to the pitch height of the first formant tone. These findings show that some aspects of auditory pitch perception apply to the perception of intonation; and, that impressions of pitch of a multicomponent nonharmonic signal can be derived from the component within the dominance region.

[1]  Jacqueline Vaissière,et al.  Language-Independent Prosodic Features , 1983 .

[2]  John E. Markel,et al.  Linear Prediction of Speech , 1976, Communication and Cybernetics.

[3]  Perceptual learning of acoustic patterns: Mirror‐image versus direction‐of‐glissando pairs , 1979 .

[4]  R. Plomp Pitch of complex tones. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  P E Rubin,et al.  On the perception of intonation from sinusoidal sentences , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  R E Remez,et al.  Perceptual normalization of vowels produced by sinusoidal voices. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  P K Kuhl,et al.  Cross-modal speech perception in adults and infants using nonspeech auditory stimuli. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Jennifer S. Pardo,et al.  On the perceptual organization of speech. , 1994, Psychological review.

[9]  R A Henson Musical perception. , 1977, Transactions of the Medical Society of London.

[10]  P E Rubin,et al.  On the perception of speech from time-varying acoustic information: Contributions of amplitude variation , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  P. Rubin,et al.  The stream of speech. , 1983 .

[12]  Steven Greenberg,et al.  WPP, No. 52: Temporal Neural Coding of Pitch and Vowel Quality , 1980 .

[13]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Some experiments on perceptual learning of mirror-image acoustic patterns , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  R. Ritsma Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues. , 1981, Science.