Patient and health professional views on rehabilitation practices and outcomes following total hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis:a focus group study

BackgroundThere is worldwide variation in rehabilitation practices after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and no agreement on which interventions will lead to optimal short and long term patient outcomes. As a first step in the development of clinical practice guidelines for post-acute rehabilitation after THA and TKA, we explored experiences and attitudes about rehabilitation practices and outcomes in groups of individuals identified as key stakeholders.MethodsSeparate focus groups and interviews were conducted with patients (THA or TKA within past year) and three health professional groups: allied health professionals (AHPs), orthopaedic surgeons, and other physicians, in Canada and the United States. Pairs of moderators led the focus groups using a standardized discussion guide. Discussions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. A content analysis within and across groups identified key themes.ResultsEleven focus groups and eight interviews took place in six sites. Patients (n = 32) varied in age, stage of recovery, and surgical and rehabilitation experiences. Health professionals (n = 44) represented a range of disciplines, practice settings and years of experience. Six key themes emerged: 1) Let's talk (issues related to patient-health professional and inter-professional communication); 2) Expecting the unexpected (observations about unanticipated recovery experiences); 3) It's attitude that counts (the importance of the patient's positive attitude and participation in recovery); 4) It takes all kinds of support (along the continuum of care); 5) Barriers to recovery (at patient, provider and system levels), and 6) Back to normal (reflecting diversity of expected outcomes). Patients offered different, but overlapping views compared to health professionals regarding rehabilitation practices and outcomes following THA and TKA.ConclusionResults will inform subsequent phases of guideline development and ensure stakeholders' perspectives shape the priorities, content and scope of the guidelines.

[1]  Sue Ziebland,et al.  Analysing qualitative data , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Jody Hoffer Gittell,et al.  Beyond our walls: impact of patient and provider coordination across the continuum on outcomes for surgical patients. , 2007, Health services research.

[3]  C. Lavernia,et al.  Postdischarge costs in arthroplasty surgery. , 2006, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  E. Roos,et al.  Effectiveness and practice variation of rehabilitation after joint replacement. , 2003, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[5]  C. Keller,et al.  A review of the efficacy of the self-management model on health outcomes in community-residing older adults with arthritis. , 2009, Worldviews on evidence-based nursing.

[6]  J. Katz,et al.  Extent of followup care after elective total hip replacement. , 2006, Journal of Rheumatology.

[7]  R. Epstein,et al.  How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes , 2022 .

[8]  S David Stulberg,et al.  Predicting Total Knee Replacement Pain: A Prospective, Observational Study , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  E. Cook,et al.  The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. , 2002, The Journal of rheumatology.

[10]  Edward C. Jones,et al.  Patients’ Expectations of Knee Surgery , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  P. Dieppe,et al.  Total knee replacement: is it really an effective procedure for all? , 2007, The Knee.

[12]  The American College of Rheumatology practice guidelines strategy. , 1995, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[13]  L. Moon,et al.  Relationships among self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and postoperative behaviors in total joint replacement patients. , 2000, Orthopedic nursing.

[14]  D. Beverland,et al.  Comparison of hip and knee arthroplasty outcomes at early and intermediate follow-up. , 2009, Orthopedics.

[15]  M. Law,et al.  A Review of Evidence on the Conceptual Elements Informing Client-Centred Practice , 2006, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[16]  David J Zukor,et al.  In-hospital cost of total hip arthroplasty in Canada and the United States. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  S. Mawson,et al.  Telerehabilitation: enabling the remote delivery of healthcare, rehabilitation, and self management. , 2009, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[18]  R. Zdero,et al.  Significant variation exists in home care services following total joint arthroplasty. , 2004, The Journal of rheumatology.

[19]  J. Skinner,et al.  Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities in rates of knee arthroplasty among Medicare patients. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  S. Middleton,et al.  Measuring outcomes from the patients' perspective. , 1999, International journal of nursing practice.

[21]  D. Jette,et al.  Use of Standardized Outcome Measures in Physical Therapist Practice: Perceptions and Applications , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[22]  Nancy Arthur,et al.  Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice , 2009, Journal of interprofessional care.

[23]  S. Nettleton,et al.  Rehabilitation and total hip replacement: patients' perspectives on provision , 2000, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[24]  E. Abrahams,et al.  National practice patterns for the care of the patient with total joint replacement. , 2002, Orthopedic nursing.

[25]  J. Kitzinger,et al.  Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups , 1995 .

[26]  G. Larsson,et al.  Postoperative experiences of pain and distress in elderly patients. An explorative study , 1999, Aging.

[27]  P. Kidd,et al.  Getting the Focus and the Group: Enhancing Analytical Rigor in Focus Group Research , 2000, Qualitative health research.

[28]  L. Dorr,et al.  The emotional state of the patient after total hip and knee arthroplasty. , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  C. Teutsch.  Patient-doctor communication. , 2003, The Medical clinics of North America.

[30]  Janet Mancini Billson,et al.  Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research , 1989 .

[31]  C. Kwoh,et al.  Racial differences in expectations of joint replacement surgery outcomes. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[32]  J. G. Horne,et al.  An Investigation of Patient Satisfaction Following Discharge After Total Hip Replacement Surgery , 2003, Orthopedic nursing.

[33]  J. Wright,et al.  Patient characteristics that affect the outcome of total hip arthroplasty: a review. , 1998, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[34]  N. Black,et al.  What is the Relationship Between Patients’ And Clinicians’ Reports of the Outcomes of Elective Surgery? , 2009, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy.

[35]  S. Berven,et al.  Management and care of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: variations across different health care settings. , 2000, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[36]  S. Hewlett.  Patients and clinicians have different perspectives on outcomes in arthritis. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[37]  C. Ackroyd,et al.  Expectations and outcome of total hip replacement. , 1981, Rheumatology and rehabilitation.

[38]  W. Zijlstra,et al.  Preoperative or postoperative self-efficacy: which is a better predictor of outcome after total hip or knee arthroplasty? , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[39]  Sunny Kim.  Changes in surgical loads and economic burden of hip and knee replacements in the US: 1997-2004. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[40]  A. Jacobson,et al.  Patients' Perspectives on Total Knee Replacement , 2008, The American journal of nursing.

[41]  J. Kirwan,et al.  Patient-reported outcomes for arthritis: time to focus on personal life impact measures? , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[42]  W. J. Rijnberg,et al.  Patient versus surgeon satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[43]  G. Guyatt,et al.  A systematic review of studies comparing health outcomes in Canada and the United States , 2007, Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal.

[44]  P Shekelle,et al.  Differences between Patients' and Physicians' Evaluations of Outcome after Total Hip Arthroplasty* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[45]  S. Openshaw,et al.  Conducting Focus Groups: Purpose and Practicalities , 2002 .

[46]  J. Salyer,et al.  Patients' and their spouses' needs after total joint arthroplasty: a pilot study. , 2000, Orthopedic nursing.

[47]  P. Gander,et al.  An assessment of sleep disturbance in patients before and after total hip arthroplasty. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[48]  Richard L Street,et al.  (Mis)understanding in patient-health care provider communication about total knee replacement. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[49]  S. Stulberg,et al.  THE JOHN INSALL AWARD: Pain and Depression Influence Outcome 5 Years after Knee Replacement Surgery , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.