On the value of including x-component data in 1D modeling of electromagnetic data from helicopterborne time domain systems in horizontally layered environments

Abstract Helicopter borne time domain EM systems historically measure only the Z-component of the secondary field, whereas fixed wing systems often measure all field components. For the latter systems the X-component is often used to map discrete conductors, whereas it finds little use in the mapping of layered settings. Measuring the horizontal X-component with an offset loop helicopter system probes the earth with a complementary sensitivity function that is very different from that of the Z-component, and could potentially be used for improving resolution of layered structures in one dimensional modeling. This area is largely unexplored in terms of quantitative results in the literature, since measuring and inverting X-component data from a helicopter system is not straightforward: The signal strength is low, the noise level is high, the signal is very sensitive to the instrument pitch and the sensitivity function also has a complex lateral behavior. The basis of our study is a state of the art inversion scheme, using a local 1D forward model description, in combination with experiences gathered from extending the SkyTEM system to measure the X component. By means of a 1D sensitivity analysis we motivate that in principle resolution of layered structures can be improved by including an X-component signal in a 1D inversion, given the prerequisite that a low-pass filter of suitably low cut-off frequency can be employed. In presenting our practical experiences with modifying the SkyTEM system we discuss why this prerequisite unfortunately can be very difficult to fulfill in practice. Having discussed instrumental limitations we show what can be obtained in practice using actual field data. Here, we demonstrate how the issue of high sensitivity towards instrument pitch can be overcome by including the pitch angle as an inversion parameter and how joint inversion of the Z- and X-components produces virtually the same model result as for the Z-component alone. We conclude that adding helicopter system X-component to a 1D inversion can be used to facilitate higher confidence in the layered result, as the requirements for fitting the data into a 1D model envelope becomes more stringent and the model result thus less prone to misinterpretation.

[1]  Pierre Keating,et al.  The usefulness of multicomponent, time-domain airborne electromagnetic measurements , 1996 .

[2]  P. B. Leggatt,et al.  The Spectrem airborne electromagnetic system—Further developments , 2000 .

[3]  Caleb Plunkett,et al.  An example of 3D conductivity mapping using the TEMPEST airborne electromagnetic system , 2000 .

[4]  E. Auken,et al.  Investigation on the groundwater resources of the south eyre peninsula, South Australia, Determined from Laterally Constrained Inversion of Tempest Data. , 2009 .

[5]  Richard S. Smith,et al.  64 Advances in Airborne Time-Domain EM Technology , 1997 .

[6]  Esben Auken,et al.  SkyTEM–a New High-resolution Helicopter Transient Electromagnetic System , 2004 .

[7]  Tim Munday,et al.  High-Resolution Airborne Electromagnetic Surveying for Dryland Salinity Management: The Toolibin Lake SkyTEM Case Study, W.A. , 2007 .

[8]  E. Auken,et al.  A Single Software For Processing, Inversion, and Presentation of AEM Data Of Different Systems: The Aarhus Workbench , 2009 .

[9]  A. Christiansen,et al.  A quantitative appraisal of airborne and ground-based transient electromagnetic (TEM) measurements in Denmark , 2003 .

[10]  G. J. Palacky,et al.  DAMPED LEAST-SQUARES INVERSION OF TIME-DOMAIN AIRBORNE EM DATA BASED ON SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION1 , 1991 .

[11]  Glenn A. Wilson,et al.  Accurate quasi 3D versus practical full 3D inversion of AEM data – the Bookpurnong case study , 2010 .

[12]  A. Christiansen,et al.  An integrated processing scheme for high-resolution airborne electromagnetic surveys, the SkyTEM system , 2009 .

[13]  Richard Irvine,et al.  The geotech VTEM time domain helicopter em system , 2004 .

[14]  Andrea Viezzoli,et al.  Quantification of modeling errors in airborne TEM caused by inaccurate system description , 2011 .

[15]  S. J. Balch,et al.  The AeroTEM airborne electromagnetic system , 2003 .

[16]  Calculation of electromagnetic sensitivities in the time domain , 1998 .

[17]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[18]  James Macnae,et al.  Predictions of bird swing from GPS coordinates , 2009 .

[19]  G. Palacky,et al.  QUANTITATIVE INTERPRETATION OF INPUT AEM MEASUREMENTS , 1973 .

[20]  Breaks in lithology: Interpretation problems when handling 2D structures with a 1D approximation , 2010 .

[21]  K. G. McCracken,et al.  Minimization of noise in electromagnetic exploration systems , 1986 .

[22]  Michael S. Zhdanov,et al.  3D inversion of airborne electromagnetic data using a moving footprint , 2010 .

[23]  D. C. Fraser,et al.  Attitude corrections of helicopter EM data using a superposed dipole model , 2004 .

[24]  A. Christiansen,et al.  Processing and inversion of SkyTEM data for high resolution hydrogeophysical surveys , 2007 .

[25]  Brian R. Spies,et al.  Local noise prediction filtering for central induction transient electromagnetic sounding , 1988 .

[26]  Greg Hodges,et al.  Case histories illustrating the characteristics of the HeliGEOTEM system , 2009 .

[27]  James Macnae,et al.  Conductivity-depth imaging of airborne electromagnetic step-response data , 1991 .

[28]  Esben Auken,et al.  Piecewise 1D laterally constrained inversion of resistivity data , 2005 .

[29]  Esben Auken,et al.  Layered and laterally constrained 2D inversion of resistivity data , 2004 .

[30]  G. W. Hohmann,et al.  4. Electromagnetic Theory for Geophysical Applications , 1987 .

[31]  N. Christensen,et al.  Sensitivity functions of frequency-domain magnetic dipole-dipole systems , 2007 .

[32]  A. P. Annan,et al.  An application of airborne GEOTEM* in Australian conditions , 1991 .