Comparisons among tools, surface orientation, and pencil grasp for children 23 months of age.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine whether writing tool type and angle of writing surface affect grasp. METHOD Fifty-one children 23 to 24 months of age who were typically developing drew with a primary marker, colored pencil, and small piece of crayon on a table and an easel. The marker and pencil were presented pointing left, right, and toward the child. The order of writing tool presentation was counterbalanced. Grasps were scored with a 5-point rating system and analyzed with dependent t tests. RESULTS Children used a more mature grasp when drawing with a piece of crayon than with a pencil. No difference in grasp maturity was found when using a pencil compared with a marker. A more mature grasp when drawing on the easel compared with the table was used with the crayon but not with the marker or pencil. CONCLUSION Results imply that a short writing tool combined with a vertical surface can influence the grasp of young children.

[1]  K. Bergmann,et al.  Incidence of atypical pencil grasps among nondysfunctional adults. , 1990, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[2]  Samuel T. Mayo,et al.  Statistical methods in education and psychology , 1979 .

[3]  Y. Saida Development of fine motor skill in children : Manipulation of a pencil in young children aged 2 to 6 years , 1979 .

[4]  M. Tseng Development of Pencil Grip Position in Preschool Children , 1998 .

[5]  G. Glass,et al.  Statistical methods in education and psychology, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[6]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Motor behavior research: implications for therapeutic approaches to central nervous system dysfunction. , 1994, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[7]  A. Henderson,et al.  Descriptive analysis of the developmental progression of grip position for pencil and crayon control in nondysfunctional children. , 1990, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[8]  C. Schneck,et al.  Comparison of pencil-grip patterns in first graders with good and poor writing skills. , 1991, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[9]  E. Thelen Motor development: A new synthesis. , 1995 .

[10]  Goodgold Sa Handwriting movement quality in prekindergarten and kindergarten children. , 1983 .

[11]  E Thelen,et al.  A dynamical systems approach to motor development. , 1990, Physical therapy.

[12]  L. Rosenbloom,et al.  The Maturation of Fine Prehension in Young Children , 1971, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[13]  M. Windsor Clinical interpretation of "grip form and graphomotor control in preschool children". , 2000, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[14]  A. W. Burton,et al.  Grip form and graphomotor control in preschool children. , 2000, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[15]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Constraints on the Development of Coordination , 1986 .

[16]  H. Whiting,et al.  Motor development in children : aspects of coordination and control , 1986 .