Structural identification with incomplete instrumentation and global identifiability requirements under base excitation

Summary Estimating the mass and stiffness parameters of a structural system via its vibration response measurements is the primary objective in the field of modal testing and structural health monitoring. The attainment of this objective, however, is hindered by various practical and theoretical issues. One such issue is incomplete instrumentation, leading to spatially incomplete mode shapes and often nonunique identification results. When the excitation is induced by ground motion, the problem is further complicated because of arbitrary normalization of mode shapes. This study attempts to address these issues for shear-building type structures. Mode shape normalization and expansion approaches are developed that utilize the topology of the structural matrices. Theoretical constraints regarding minimal instrumentation and the necessity for any a priori information are addressed vis-a-vis the requirements for global identifiability. Some practical implementation issues are discussed. The performance of the method is evaluated using numerical simulations and shake table experiments. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Richard W. Longman,et al.  Obtaining refined first‐order predictive models of linear structural systems , 2002 .

[2]  Xingrui Ma,et al.  Estimated mass and stiffness matrices of shear building from modal test data , 1998 .

[3]  F. Udwadia,et al.  Some Uniqueness Results Related to Building Structural Identification , 1978 .

[4]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Finite-Element Model Updating for Assessment of Progressive Damage in a 3-Story Infilled RC Frame , 2013 .

[5]  Chan Ghee Koh,et al.  A hybrid computational strategy for identification of structural parameters , 2003 .

[6]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  On global identifiability for arbitrary model parametrizations , 1994, Autom..

[7]  F. Udwadia Methodology for Optimum Sensor Locations for Parameter Identification in Dynamic Systems , 1994 .

[8]  J. Beck,et al.  UPDATING MODELS AND THEIR UNCERTAINTIES. II: MODEL IDENTIFIABILITY. TECHNICAL NOTE , 1998 .

[9]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics , 1995 .

[10]  G. M. L. Gladwell,et al.  Inverse Finite Element Vibration Problems , 1999 .

[11]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Efficient model updating and health monitoring methodology using incomplete modal data without mode matching , 2006 .

[12]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Optimal sensor placement methodology for parametric identification of structural systems , 2004 .

[13]  Huajun Li,et al.  Cross-model cross-mode method for model updating , 2007 .

[14]  Raimondo Betti,et al.  Identification of Structural Systems using an Evolutionary Strategy , 2004 .

[15]  Raimondo Betti,et al.  Experimental studies on damage detection in frame structures using vibration measurements , 2010 .

[16]  Raimondo Betti,et al.  Modal parameter based structural identification using input–output data: Minimal instrumentation and global identifiability issues , 2014 .

[17]  Raimondo Betti,et al.  Identification of structural models using a modified Artificial Bee Colony algorithm , 2013 .

[18]  Suparno Mukhopadhyay Structural Identification, Health Monitoring and Uncertainty Quantification under Incomplete Information with Minimal Requirements for Identifiability , 2015 .

[19]  Dionisio Bernal,et al.  Flexibility-Based Approach for Damage Characterization: Benchmark Application , 2004 .

[20]  Stefano Gabriele,et al.  Mechanical identification and model validation for shear-type frames , 2005 .

[21]  Raimondo Betti,et al.  Propagation of mode shape errors in structural identification , 2012 .

[22]  Richard W. Longman,et al.  Identification of linear structural systems using earthquake‐induced vibration data , 1999 .

[23]  James L. Beck,et al.  Two-Stage Structural Health Monitoring Approach for Phase I Benchmark Studies , 2004 .

[24]  M. Phan,et al.  Identification of observer/Kalman filter Markov parameters: Theory and experiments , 1993 .

[25]  Richard W. Longman,et al.  Extracting Physical Parameters of Mechanical Models From Identified State-Space Representations , 2002 .

[26]  Firdaus E. Udwadia,et al.  Uniqueness of Damping and Stiffness Distributions in the Identification of Soil and Structural Systems , 1978 .

[27]  Raimondo Betti,et al.  A statistical framework with stiffness proportional damagesensitive features for structural health monitoring , 2015 .

[28]  R. E. Hudson,et al.  Story‐by‐story estimation of the stiffness parameters of laterally‐torsionally coupled buildings using forced or ambient vibration data: I. Formulation and verification , 2012 .

[29]  Maria Q. Feng,et al.  Structural Reliability Estimation with Vibration-Based Identified Parameters , 2010 .

[30]  Raimondo Betti,et al.  Damage Detection Using Flexibility Proportional Coordinate Modal Assurance Criterion , 2014 .

[31]  Mustafa Gul,et al.  Damage assessment using flexibility and flexibility-based curvature for structural health monitoring , 2008 .

[32]  Richard W. Longman,et al.  On the Uniqueness of Solutions for the Identification of Linear Structural Systems , 2006 .

[33]  Roger Ghanem,et al.  A novel approach for the structural identification and monitoring of a full-scale 17-story building based on ambient vibration measurements , 2008 .

[34]  Jer-Nan Juang,et al.  An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. [control systems design for large space structures] , 1985 .