Reconstruction of head-to-hood impact in an automobile-to-child-pedestrian collision

Abstract Head injuries are among the most common injuries sustained in automobile-to-childpedestrian collisions (ACPCs), and are the leading cause of death. The aim of this article is to systematically investigate child impact dynamics, head injury biomechanics and associated tolerance levels. For this purpose, two numerical methods, a multibody system (MBS) method with MBS pedestrian and car models and a facet element method with facet pedestrian and car models, were used to reconstruct an actual ACPC. Reconstruction results revealed good agreement between the kinematics generated by the child pedestrian models and the corresponding values from the actual accident in terms of wrap-around distance and throw distance. Both methods generated similar estimates of head-impact conditions, like impact velocity, impact angle and impact timing. The calculated head injury parameters of these two pedestrian models also exhibited good correlation with the head injuries sustained in the actual accident.

[1]  Peter Löwenhielm,et al.  Strain tolerance of the Vv. Cerebri sup. (Bridging Veins) calculated from head-on collision tests with cadavers , 2005, Zeitschrift für Rechtsmedizin.

[2]  F. A. Berg,et al.  Pedestrian Protection in Europe The Potential of Car Design and Impact Testing , 2002 .

[3]  Ali S Al-Ghamdi,et al.  Pedestrian-vehicle crashes and analytical techniques for stratified contingency tables. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Hirotoshi Ishikawa,et al.  SUMMARY OF IHRA PEDESTRIAN SAFETY WG ACTIVITIES (2005) - PROPOSED TEST METHODS TO EVALUATE PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION AFFORDED BY PASSENGER CARS , 2001 .

[5]  Jack van Hoof,et al.  Improving pedestrian safety using numerical human models. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[6]  Yasuhiro Matsuoka,et al.  Simulation of car-pedestrian accident for evaluate car structure , 1998 .

[7]  Xuejun Liu,et al.  Development of Child Pedestrian Mathematical Models and Evaluation with Accident Reconstruction , 2002 .

[8]  S. Margulies,et al.  A proposed tolerance criterion for diffuse axonal injury in man. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  L. Thibault,et al.  Biomechanics of acute subdural hematoma. , 1982, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  Jeffrey Richard Crandall,et al.  Lateral Injury Criteria for the 6-year-old Pedestrian - Part I: Criteria for the Head, Neck, Thorax, Abdomen and Pelvis , 2004 .

[11]  Per Lövsund,et al.  A Human-Body 3D Mathematical Model for Simulation of Car-Pedestrian Impacts , 2000 .

[12]  Erik G. Takhounts,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED INJURY CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE RESTRAINT SYSTEMS - II , 1999 .

[13]  Dietmar Otte,et al.  Pedestrian Impact Priorities Using Real-World Crash Data and Harm , 2004 .

[14]  Jinglin Yang EFFECTS OF VEHICLE FRONT DESIGN PARAMETERS ON PEDESTRIAN HEAD-BRAIN INJURY PROTECTION , 2003 .