Shape similarity and distance disparity as apparent motion correspondence cues

Apparent motion is perceived when two spots of light are presented successively in different locations. When more than one element is present in each frame, there is a correspondence problem in matching the elements in one frame with those in the other. We report the effects of shape similarity and distance disparity on the correspondence process. Twenty subjects were tested using a 2-AFC design. We found that both shape and distance cues are used by the correspondence process: when distance is the only cue the motion which is usually perceived is that involving the shorter distance; when shape is the only cue the motion involving two elements of the same shape is preferred. We also studied the interaction between the two cues when both were present. Quantitative measures of the relative strengths of these effects and of their interaction are reported. A Signal Detection Theory model is used to analyze these apparent motion correspondence effects.

[1]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Biological image motion processing: A review , 1985, Vision Research.

[2]  S. Ullman The Interpretation of Visual Motion , 1979 .

[3]  O J Braddick,et al.  Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  Jesse Orlansky,et al.  The effect of similarity and difference in form on apparent visual movement , 1940 .

[5]  Marc Green,et al.  What determines correspondence strength in apparent motion? , 1986, Vision Research.

[6]  D. Navon,et al.  Irrelevance of figural identity for resolving ambiguities in apparent motion. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Robert Shapley,et al.  An electronic visual stimulator , 1976 .

[8]  P. A. Kolers Aspects of motion perception , 1972 .

[9]  V S Ramachandran,et al.  Low Spatial Frequencies Dominate Apparent Motion , 1983, Perception.

[10]  P. Burt,et al.  Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. , 1981 .

[11]  S. Anstis The perception of apparent movement. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[12]  B. Julesz,et al.  Displacement limits for spatial frequency filtered random-dot cinematograms in apparent motion , 1983, Vision Research.

[13]  O. Braddick A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[14]  Jonathan D. Victor,et al.  A two-dimensional computer-controlled visual stimulator , 1980 .

[15]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .