Ultrasonic tracking reveals multiple behavioural modes of snapper (Pagrus auratus) in a temperate no-take marine reserve

Interactions between marine reserve populations and non-reserve populations of exploited fishes have generally been modelled using simplistic assumptions about behaviour. Consequently, there is a recognized need for better information on fish movement behaviour at the appropriate spatial scales to generate more realistic interaction models. Automated ultrasonic tracking of marine fish, applied in this study, offers the potential to continuously track individuals for periods of up to several years within the study area. Snapper (Pagrus auratus) (FL: 33-68 cm) were surgically implanted with individually coded ultrasonic transmitters to monitor their movement within the Cape Rodney to Okakari Point Marine Reserve in northeast New Zealand from October 2001 to September 2002. The range of movement patterns observed includes some fish resident for the entire tracking period, while others were more mobile. Of the latter group, some fish left the array permanently while others returned after up to 83 days of continuous absence. Nearly all fish showed some level of site fidelity for varying periods of the time they were tracked. Fish activity peaked in the summer, when highest densities are known to occur. Results suggest that snapper behaviour is variable, and that patterns of habitat utilization vary between fish and also seasonally. Such a complex range of behaviours may be a key component for achieving desirable outcomes for both conservation and fisheries in marine reserves.

[1]  Darren M. Parsons,et al.  Evidence for long‐term site fidelity of snapper (Pagrus auratus) within a marine reserve , 2001 .

[2]  N. Polunin,et al.  Are marine reserves effective in management of reef fisheries? , 1991, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[3]  C. Attwood,et al.  Variation in Dispersal of Galjoen (Coracinus capensis) (Teleostei: Coracinidae) from a Marine Reserve , 1994 .

[4]  Robin K. S. Hankin,et al.  Snapper Pagrus auratus (Sparidae) home range dynamics : acoustic tagging studies in a marine reserve , 2003 .

[5]  J. Ginsberg,et al.  Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas , 1998, Science.

[6]  Donald L. Kramer,et al.  Implications of fish home range size and relocation for marine reserve function , 1999, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[7]  M. Tupper.  Marine Reserves and Fisheries Management , 2002, Science.

[8]  J. L. Munro.  Outmigration and movement of tagged coral reef fish in a marine fishery reserve in Jamaica , 1998 .

[9]  R. J. Davidson,et al.  Direct evidence of limited dispersal of the reef fishParapercis colias (Pinguipedidae) within a marine reserve and adjacent fished areas , 2000 .

[10]  D. Scott,et al.  The Value of a Spillover Fishery for Spiny Lobsters Around a Marine Reserve in Northern New Zealand , 2002 .

[11]  R. Millar,et al.  Detection of spatial variability in relative density of fishes: comparison of visual census, angling, and baited underwater video , 2000 .

[12]  D. Reed,et al.  Conceptual Issues Relevant to Marine Harvest Refuges: Examples from Temperate Reef Fishes , 1993 .

[13]  H. Oxenford,et al.  Home range size and use of space by Bermuda chub Kyphosus sectatrix (L.) in two marine reserves in the Soufrière Marine Management Area, St Lucia, West Indies , 2001 .

[14]  C. Roberts,et al.  Effects of marine reserves on adjacent fisheries. , 2001, Science.

[15]  N. Caputi,et al.  Sexual and local variation in head morphology of snapper, Pagrus auratus, Sparidae, in the Shark Bay region of Western Australia , 1999 .

[16]  Colin A. Simpfendorfer,et al.  Estimation of short-term centers of activity from an array of omnidirectional hydrophones and its use in studying animal movements , 2002 .

[17]  Dirk Zeller,et al.  Ultrasonic telemetry: Its application to coral reef fisheries research , 1999 .

[18]  Ray Hilborn,et al.  Marine reserves and fisheries management. , 2002, Science.

[19]  Christopher G. Lowe,et al.  Movements and dispersal patterns of blue trevally (Caranx melampygus) in a fisheries conservation zone , 1996 .

[20]  Garry R. Russ,et al.  Marine reserves: patterns of adult movement of the coral trout (Plectropomus leopardus (Serranidae)) , 1998 .

[21]  G. Russ,et al.  A direct test of the effects of protective management on abundance and yield of tropical marine resources , 1990 .

[22]  Dale M. Webber,et al.  Ultrasonic Telemetry, Tracking and Automated Monitoring Technology for Sharks , 2001, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[23]  J. Crossland.  Snapper tagging in north‐east New Zealand, 1974: Analysis of methods, return rates, and movements , 1976 .

[24]  Dirk Zeller,et al.  Home range and activity patterns of the coral trout Plectropomus leopardus (Serranidae) , 1997 .

[25]  R. Millar,et al.  Protection of exploited fish in temperate regions: high density and biomass of snapper Pagrus auratus (Sparidae) in northern New Zealand marine reserves , 2003 .

[26]  N. Barrett.  Short- and Long-term Movement Patterns of Six Temperate Reef Fishes (Families Labridae and Monacanthidae) , 1995 .

[27]  Jane Lubchenco,et al.  MARINE RESERVES ARE NECESSARY BUT NOT SUFFICIENT FOR MARINE CONSERVATION , 1998 .

[28]  K. Matthews.  A telemetric study of the home ranges and homing routes of copper and quillback rockfishes on shallow rocky reefs , 1990 .

[29]  K. Matthews.  An experimental study of the habitat preferences and movement patterns of copper, quillback, and brown rockfishes (Sebastes spp.) , 1990, Environmental Biology of Fishes.