Marginal Fit Evaluation of Cad/Cam All Ceramic Crowns Obtained by Two Digital Workflows: An In-Vitro Study Using Micro-Ct Technology.

PURPOSE To evaluate the marginal fit of CAD/CAM all ceramic crowns made from lithium disilicate and zirconia using two different fabrication protocols (model and model-less). MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty anterior all ceramic restorations (20 lithium disilicate, 20 zirconia) were fabricated from digital impression using a CEREC Bluecam scanner. Two different digital workflows were used: a fully digital model-less approach and a printed model digital approach. The crowns were cemented on the respective prepared typodont teeth and marginal gap was evaluated using Micro-CT. Each specimen was analyzed in sagittal and trans-axial orientations, allowing evaluation of the marginal fit (vertical and horizontal) on each surface. Logarithmic transformation was used with a significance of 0.05. After that a reliability analysis was performed by re-measuring four randomized selected images for each specimen and performing intra-class correlations to determine any systematic bias in the measurements. RESULTS Vertical measurements in the lingual, distal and mesial views had an estimated marginal gap ranging from 101.9 to 133.9 microns for lithium disilicate crowns and 126.4 to 165.4 microns for zirconia. No significant differences were found between model and model-less techniques. CONCLUSIONS Both workflows are valid protocols for the fabrication of monolithic ceramic restorations. The use of a printed model did not improve the marginal fit of lithium disilicate or zirconia crowns. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved Both materials are also clinically acceptable, no matter which workflow was used to obtain the restoration.

[1]  J. Marinković,et al.  Laboratory-Based Investigation of Denture Sonication Method in Patients with Candida-Associated Denture Stomatitis. , 2019, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[2]  N. Z. Baba,et al.  Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques , 2018, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[3]  Eran Dolev,et al.  Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns. , 2019, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  Ji-Hwan Kim,et al.  A comparative study of additive and subtractive manufacturing for dental restorations , 2017, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  Tamer A. Hamza,et al.  In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD‐CAM systems , 2017, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  Jae-Hyun Kim,et al.  Fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from conventional and digital impressions assessed with micro-CT. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  Konstantinos Chochlidakis,et al.  Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  K. Vandewalle,et al.  Microstructural evolution and physical behavior of a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. , 2015, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[9]  G. Thomas,et al.  3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. , 2014, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[10]  Karla Zancopé,et al.  Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique. , 2014, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  L. Cooper,et al.  Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. , 2014, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  C. Wyatt,et al.  A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. , 2014, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  Flávio Domingues das Neves,et al.  Micrometric precision of prosthetic dental crowns obtained by optical scanning and computer-aided designing/computer-aided manufacturing system , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[14]  B. Wöstmann,et al.  Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow , 2013, BDJ.

[15]  Muhanad M Hatamleh,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of methods to measure marginal adaptation of crowns and FDPs: a literature review. , 2013, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[16]  O. Schaefer,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study. , 2012, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  A. Keshvad,et al.  Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques. , 2011, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[18]  Andreas Syrek,et al.  Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. , 2010, Journal of dentistry.

[19]  Sunghuen Kim,et al.  Influence of porcelain veneering on the marginal fit of Digident and Lava CAD/CAM zirconia ceramic crowns , 2010, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[20]  Jack L Ferracane,et al.  Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D. , 2010, Operative dentistry.

[21]  S. Reich,et al.  Marginal fit of heat-pressed vs. CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic onlays using a milling unit prototype. , 2008, Operative dentistry.

[22]  Kyu-Bok Lee,et al.  Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic crowns fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems. , 2008, Dental materials journal.

[23]  I. Denry,et al.  Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic: an overview. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[24]  W. Mörmann,et al.  Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. , 2005, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[25]  P. Gaengler,et al.  Correlation between clinical scoring of secondary caries at crown margins and histologically assessed extent of the lesions. , 2000, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[26]  S. Bayne,et al.  Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[27]  S. Bayne,et al.  Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[28]  J. Mclean,et al.  The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique , 1971, British Dental Journal.

[29]  J. L. Stewart,et al.  Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: life-span and causes for loss of serviceability. , 1970, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[30]  G. Christensen Marginal fit of gold inlay castings. , 1966, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.