Role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in predicting epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE To compare (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and computed tomography (CT) imaging characteristics in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with or without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. METHODS We retrospectively identified NSCLC patients who underwent EGFR mutation testing and pretreatment FDG-PET and CT scans. The maximum standard uptake value (SUV(max)) of the primary tumor and any metastases was measured and normalized to the SUV of blood in the pulmonary artery. We compared normalized SUV(max) values between EGFR-mutant and wild-type patients and modeled radiographic and clinical predictors of EGFR mutation status. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify potential SUV cutoffs predictive of genotype. RESULTS We included 100 patients (24 EGFR-mutant and 76 wild-type). There was a trend for higher normalized SUV(max) in the primary tumors among patients with EGFR-wild-type versus mutant (median, 3.4; range, 0.6-12.8; versus median, 2.9; range, 0.4-5.0; p = .09). Normalized SUV(max) of nodal and distant metastases, and CT characteristics were not associated with genotype. On multivariate analysis, low normalized SUV(max) of the primary tumor was predictive for EGFR mutation (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.98; p = .034). ROC curve analyses yielded an area under the curve of 0.62, and identified a potential cutoff of ≥ 5.0 to distinguish wild-type from mutant tumors. CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective study, high FDG avidity (normalized SUV(max) ≥ 5) correlated with EGFR-wild-type genotype. Although genotyping remains the gold standard, further work to validate FDG-PET as a surrogate for tumor genotype may provide useful information in patients without available tumor tissue.

[1]  A. Gemma,et al.  F1000 highlights , 2010 .

[2]  David N Louis,et al.  Rapid targeted mutational analysis of human tumours: a clinical platform to guide personalized cancer medicine , 2010, EMBO molecular medicine.

[3]  Michelle S. Ginsberg,et al.  Are There Imaging Characteristics Associated with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and KRAS Mutations in Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Lung with Bronchioloalveolar Features? , 2010, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[4]  J. Shih,et al.  Correlation of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography maximal standardized uptake value and EGFR mutations in advanced lung adenocarcinoma , 2010, Medical oncology.

[5]  S. Toyooka,et al.  Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  T. Mok,et al.  Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  R. Wahl,et al.  Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Correlates With Akt Pathway Activity but Is Not Predictive of Clinical Outcome During mTOR Inhibitor Therapy , 2009 .

[8]  L. Sequist,et al.  Toward noninvasive genomic screening of lung cancer patients. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  D. Wood,et al.  Relationship Between Non-small Cell Lung Cancer FDG Uptake at PET, Tumor Histology, and Ki-67 Proliferation Index , 2008, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[10]  M. Meyerson,et al.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Testing in the Care of Lung Cancer Patients , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  H. Sasaki,et al.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutation and Computed Tomographic Findings in Peripheral Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma , 2006, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[12]  A. Fischman,et al.  Lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum: prevalence and features on fusion 18F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT. , 2005, Chest.

[13]  R. Deberardinis,et al.  The glucose dependence of Akt-transformed cells can be reversed by pharmacologic activation of fatty acid β-oxidation , 2005, Oncogene.

[14]  S. Digumarthy,et al.  Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Pattern of Pulmonary Lymphangitic Carcinomatosis , 2005, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  R. Wilson,et al.  EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from "never smokers" and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Daniel A. Haber,et al.  Gefitinib-Sensitizing EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer Activate Anti-Apoptotic Pathways , 2004, Science.

[17]  S. Gabriel,et al.  EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib Therapy , 2004, Science.

[18]  A. Alavi,et al.  Akt Stimulates Aerobic Glycolysis in Cancer Cells , 2004, Cancer Research.

[19]  Patricia L. Harris,et al.  Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  R. Hustinx,et al.  Within-patient variability of (18)F-FDG: standardized uptake values in normal tissues. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  A. Fischman,et al.  FDG-PET in staging and restaging non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: correlation with histopathology. , 2002, Lung cancer.

[22]  D. Wood,et al.  Lung cancer proliferation correlates with [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography. , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[23]  Sung-Cheng Huang,et al.  Anatomy of SUV , 2000 .

[24]  Gerald J. Kutcher,et al.  The impact of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) lymph node staging on the radiation treatment volumes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer , 2000 .

[25]  R L Wahl,et al.  Standardized uptake values of normal tissues at PET with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: variations with body weight and a method for correction. , 1993, Radiology.

[26]  M. Kalra,et al.  FDG PET/CT in assessment of pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  Jae Cheol Lee,et al.  18F-FDG uptake and EGFR mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis. , 2010, Lung cancer.

[28]  V Kalff,et al.  Clinical impact of (18)F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective study. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.