Learning of Dynamic Soil Behavior from Downhole Arrays

An increasing number of downhole arrays are deployed to measure motions at the ground surface and within the soil profile. Measurements from these arrays provide an opportunity to improve site response models and to better understand underlying dynamic soil behavior. Parametric inverse analysis approaches have been used to identify constitutive model parameters to achieve a better match with field observations. However, they are limited by the selected material model. Nonparametric inverse analysis approaches identify averaged soil behavior between measurement locations. A novel inverse analysis framework, self-learning simulations (SelfSim), is employed to reproduce the measured downhole array response while extracting the underlying soil behavior of individual soil layers unconstrained by prior assumptions of soil behavior. SelfSim is successfully applied to recordings from Lotung and La Cienega. The extracted soil behavior from few events can be used to reliably predict the measured response for other events. The field extracted soil behavior shows dependencies of shear modulus and damping on cyclic shear strain level, number of loading cycles, and strain rate that are similar qualitatively to those reported from laboratory studies but differ quantitatively.

[1]  Mehmet Baris Darendeli,et al.  Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves , 2001 .

[2]  S. Elachachi,et al.  An identification procedure of soil profile characteristics from two free field acclerometer records , 2005 .

[3]  Ahmed Elgamal,et al.  Lotung Downhole Array. II: Evaluation of Soil Nonlinear Properties , 1995 .

[4]  Ahmed Elgamal,et al.  Dynamic Soil Properties, Seismic Downhole Arrays and Applications in Practice , 2001 .

[5]  L. Matešić,et al.  Strain-rate effect on soil secant shear modulus at small cyclic strains , 2003 .

[6]  G Pande,et al.  Finite elements with artificial intelligence , 2002 .

[7]  G. N. Pande,et al.  On self-learning finite element codes based on monitored response of structures , 2000 .

[8]  Chi-Chin Tsai.  Seismic Site Response and Extraction of Dynamic Soil Behavior From Downhole Array Measurements , 2007 .

[9]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  A novel framework integrating downhole array data and site response analysis to extract dynamic soil behavior , 2008 .

[10]  Jamshid Ghaboussi,et al.  Constitutive modeling of geomaterials from non-uniform material tests , 1998 .

[11]  M. P. Romo,et al.  The Mexico Earthquake of September 19, 1985—Relationships between Soil Conditions and Earthquake Ground Motions , 1988 .

[12]  Steven D. Glaser,et al.  System identification estimation of soil properties at the Lotung site , 2000 .

[13]  R. Dobry,et al.  Effect of Soil Plasticity on Cyclic Response , 1991 .

[14]  H. Bolton Seed,et al.  An analysis of ground motions during the 1957 San Francisco earthquake , 1968 .

[15]  Mladen Vucetic,et al.  Cyclic Threshold Shear Strains in Soils , 1994 .

[16]  W R Hudson,et al.  DEFORMATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOILS AT SMALL TO INTERMEDIATE STRAINS FROM CYCLIC TESTS. INTERIM REPORT , 1992 .

[17]  Mehmet Celebi,et al.  Engineering Aspects of the September 19, 1985 Mexico Earthquake , 1987 .

[18]  Steven D. Glaser,et al.  Identification of soil degradation during earthquake excitations by Bayesian inference , 2003 .

[19]  Anthony F. Shakal,et al.  RECENT DATA RECORDED FROM DOWNHOLE GEOTECHNICAL ARRAYS , 2000 .

[20]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Systematic update of a deep excavation model using field performance data , 2003 .

[21]  K. Wen,et al.  Strong Ground Motion in the Taipei Basin from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake , 2005 .

[22]  Kenneth H. Stokoe,et al.  Strain-Rate Dependent Shear Modulus of San Francisco Bay Mud , 1981 .

[23]  Izzat M. Idriss,et al.  NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR OF SOFT CLAYS DURING CYCLIC LOADING , 1978 .

[24]  Mladen Vucetic,et al.  DEGRADATION OF MARINE CLAYS UNDER CYCLIC LOADING , 1988 .