Risk Assessment‐the Mother of All Uncertainties: Disciplinary Perspectives on Uncertainty in Risk Assessment

Abstract: Uncertainty in the detection and evaluation of chemical hazards to health leads to challenges when conducting risk assessments. Some of the uncertainty has to do with data, some with incomplete understanding of processes, and some with the most fundamental ways of viewing the questions. True variability‐across space, in time, or among individuals‐complicates the search for understanding many important aspects of risk. A few statistical and toxicologic tools are available to assess uncertainty. Three methods of classifying uncertainty are briefly discussed. In addition, our disciplinary background may influence how we view and discuss variability and uncertainty. We rarely know as much as we think we do (and not just in risk assessment). Great uncertainty is likely to remain an important part of risk assessment for some decades to come.

[1]  Barbara G. Callahan Commemoration of the 50th anniversary of Monte Carlo , 1996 .

[2]  J C Bailar,et al.  One-hit models of carcinogenesis: conservative or not? , 1988, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  A J Bailer,et al.  An introduction to the use of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models in risk assessment , 1997, Statistical methods in medical research.

[4]  L. Kozlowski,et al.  Smokers are unaware of the filter vents now on most cigarettes: results of a national survey. , 1996, Tobacco control.

[5]  R. Keeney,et al.  Improving risk communication. , 1986, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  H. J. Magnuson Determining Risks to Health: Federal Policy and Practice , 1986 .

[7]  P. D. Anderson Scientific Origins of Incompatibility in Risk Assessment , 1988 .

[8]  R. McClellan A commentary on the NRC report "Science and judgment in risk assessment". , 1994, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.