Empirical and theoretical investigation of the noise performance of indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology.

Noise properties of active matrix, flat-panel imagers under conditions relevant to diagnostic radiology are investigated. These studies focus on imagers based upon arrays with pixels incorporating a discrete photodiode coupled to a thin-film transistor, both fabricated from hydrogenated amorphous silicon. These optically sensitive arrays are operated with an overlying x-ray converter to allow indirect detection of incident x rays. External electronics, including gate driver circuits and preamplification circuits, are also required to operate the arrays. A theoretical model describing the signal and noise transfer properties of the imagers under conditions relevant to diagnostic radiography, fluoroscopy, and mammography is developed. This frequency-dependent model is based upon a cascaded systems analysis wherein the imager is conceptually divided into a series of stages having intrinsic gain and spreading properties. Predictions from the model are compared with x-ray sensitivity and noise measurements obtained from individual pixels from an imager with a pixel format of 1536 x 1920 pixels at a pixel pitch of 127 microns. The model is shown to be in excellent agreement with measurements obtained with diagnostic x rays using various phosphor screens. The model is used to explore the potential performance of existing and hypothetical imagers for application in radiography, fluoroscopy, and mammography as a function of exposure, additive noise, and fill factor. These theoretical predictions suggest that imagers of this general design incorporating a CsI: Tl intensifying screen can be optimized to provide detective quantum efficiency (DQE) superior to existing screen-film and storage phosphor systems for general radiography and mammography. For fluoroscopy, the model predicts that with further optimization of a-Si:H imagers, DQE performance approaching that of the best x-ray image intensifier systems may be possible. The results of this analysis suggest strategies for future improvements of this imaging technology.

[1]  P. Munro,et al.  A quantum accounting and detective quantum efficiency analysis for video-based portal imaging. , 1997, Medical physics.

[2]  Gregory J. Murphy,et al.  Lag vs noise in fluoroscopic imaging , 1993, Medical Imaging.

[3]  Norbert Conrads,et al.  Fluoroscopic x-ray imaging with amorphous silicon thin-film arrays , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[4]  R. Street,et al.  Factors Affecting Image Quality for Megavoltage and Diagnostic X-Ray a-Si:H Imaging Arrays. , 1992 .

[5]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Toward consensus on quantitative assessment of medical imaging systems. , 1995, Medical physics.

[6]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Large-area flat-panel amorphous silicon imagers , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[7]  O H Suleiman,et al.  Average radiation exposure values for three diagnostic radiographic examinations. , 1990, Radiology.

[8]  H. Blume,et al.  DQE(f) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices. , 1995, Medical physics.

[9]  Robert Stanton,et al.  Radiological Imaging: The Theory of Image Formation, Detection, and Processing , 1983 .

[10]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Evaluation of the MTF for a-Si:H imaging arrays , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[11]  J. Yorkston,et al.  Radiation response characteristics of amorphous silicon arrays for megavoltage radiotherapy imaging , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[12]  Rodney Shaw.  Quantifying the efficiency of imaging systems: a decade of progress in optimizing screen-films for x-ray detection , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[13]  Lellery Storm,et al.  Photon cross sections from 1 keV to 100 MeV for elements Z=1 to Z=100 , 1970 .

[14]  M. Giger,et al.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 2. Noise Wiener spectrum. , 1984, Medical physics.

[15]  Denny L. Y. Lee,et al.  New digital detector for projection radiography , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[16]  H. Mimura,et al.  A two-dimensional image sensor with aSi:H pin diodes , 1991 .

[17]  B. Widrow.  A Study of Rough Amplitude Quantization by Means of Nyquist Sampling Theory , 1956 .

[18]  Muneaki Yamaguchi,et al.  Two-dimensional contact-type image sensor using amorphous silicon photo-transistor , 1993 .

[19]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: feasibility of a flat panel self-scanned detector for digital radiology. , 1995, Medical physics.

[20]  M J Yaffe,et al.  Analysis of the spatial-frequency-dependent DQE of optically coupled digital mammography detectors. , 1994, Medical physics.

[21]  P. R. Bevington,et al.  Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences , 1969 .

[22]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Visual impact of the nonzero spatial frequency quantum sink , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[23]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Development of thin-film flat-panel arrays for diagnostic and radiotherapy imaging , 1992, Medical Imaging.

[24]  R. K. Swank.  Absorption and noise in x‐ray phosphors , 1973 .

[25]  Thierry Ducourant,et al.  Amorphous silicon x-ray image sensor , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[26]  M J Yaffe,et al.  Effect of finite phosphor thickness on detective quantum efficiency. , 1989, Medical physics.

[27]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Current‐noise‐power spectra of amorphous silicon thin‐film transistors , 1994 .

[28]  William V. Schempp,et al.  Signal, noise, and detective quantum efficiency in CCD-based x-ray imaging systems for use in mammography , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[29]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Current-noise-power-spectra for amorphous silicon photodiode sensors , 1993 .

[30]  Youming Li,et al.  Amorphous silicon image sensor for x-ray applications , 1995, Electronic Imaging.

[31]  R P Rossi,et al.  A survey of fluoroscopic exposure rates: AAPM Task Group No. 11 Report. , 1993, Medical physics.

[32]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Photoresponse linearity of a-Si: H imaging pixels , 1993 .

[33]  Neil C. Bird,et al.  2D Image Sensing Arrays with NIP Diodes , 1993 .

[34]  F. Hatori,et al.  Analysis of signal to noise ratio of photoconductive layered solid-state imaging device , 1995 .

[35]  Robert Grover Brown,et al.  Introduction to random signal analysis and Kalman filtering , 1983 .

[36]  J Yorkston,et al.  Empirical investigation of the signal performance of a high-resolution, indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) for fluoroscopic and radiographic operation. , 1997, Medical physics.

[37]  J A Rowlands,et al.  Absorption and noise in cesium iodide x-ray image intensifiers. , 1983, Medical physics.

[38]  C E Dick,et al.  Image information transfer properties of x-ray intensifying screens in the energy range from 17 to 320 keV. , 1993, Medical physics.

[39]  Ian A. Cunningham,et al.  Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of coupling a CCD to a scintillating phosphor for x-ray microtomographic imaging , 1993, Medical Imaging.

[40]  David P. Trauernicht,et al.  The Measurement Of Conversion Noise In X-Ray Intensifying Screens , 1988, Medical Imaging.

[41]  Walter Dr. Hillen,et al.  Signal-to-noise performance in cesium iodide x-ray fluorescent screens , 1991, Medical Imaging.

[42]  Robert F. Wagner,et al.  Laboratory measurements of sensitometry, MTF, veiling glare, Wiener spectrum and DQE for image intensifier tubes , 1993, Medical Imaging.

[43]  Robert A. Street,et al.  Amorphous silicon area detectors for protein crystallography , 1995, Electronic Imaging.

[44]  P C Bunch,et al.  Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a radiographic screen-film combination. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[45]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Radiation response of amorphous silicon imaging arrays at diagnostic energies , 1994 .

[46]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  MTF measurements with high-resolution a-Si:H imaging arrays , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[47]  A Fenster,et al.  A spatial-frequency dependent quantum accounting diagram and detective quantum efficiency model of signal and noise propagation in cascaded imaging systems. , 1994, Medical physics.

[48]  M. Rabbani,et al.  Detective quantum efficiency of imaging systems with amplifying and scattering mechanisms. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[49]  M. Yaffe,et al.  Signal-to-noise properties of mammographic film-screen systems. , 1985, Medical physics.

[50]  Michael J. Flynn,et al.  Effect of direct x-ray interaction in the photodetector on image noise for a CCD/scintillator system , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[51]  R. Bracewell.  The Fourier Transform and Its Applications , 1966 .

[52]  Richard L. Van Metter,et al.  Conversion noise measurement for front and back x-ray intensifying screens , 1990, Medical Imaging.

[53]  F. C. Fitchen,et al.  Low-Noise Electronic Design , 1973 .

[54]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Considerations for High Frame Rate Operation of Two-Dimensional a-Si:H Imaging Arrays , 1993 .

[55]  Gerhard Spekowius,et al.  Simulation of the imaging performance of x-ray image intensifier/TV camera chains , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[56]  Richard L. Weisfield,et al.  Two-dimensional amorphous silicon image sensor arrays , 1996 .

[57]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Theoretical performance of amorphous silicon imagers in diagnostic radiology , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[58]  H. E. Johns,et al.  Physics of Radiology , 1983 .