Improving the Clarity of Journal Abstracts in Psychology

Background. Previous research with structured abstracts has taken place in mainly medical contexts. This research indicated that such abstracts are more informative, more readable, and more appreciated by readers than are traditional abstracts. Aim. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that structured abstracts might also be appropriate for a particular psychology journal. Method. Twenty-four traditional abstracts from the Journal of Educational Psychology were rewritten in a structured form. Measures of word length, information content, and readability were made for both sets of abstracts, and forty-eight authors rated their clarity. Results. The structured abstracts were significantly longer than the original ones, but they were also significantly more informative and readable and judged significantly clearer by these academic authors. Conclusions. These findings support the notion that structured abstracts could be profitably introduced into psychology journals.

[1]  F. W. Lancaster,et al.  Abstracts and Abstracting in Knowledge Discovery , 1999, Libr. Trends.

[2]  Joost Kircz,et al.  Modularity: the next form of scientific information presentation? , 1998, J. Documentation.

[3]  Andrew Booth,et al.  The value of structured abstracts in information retrieval from MEDLINE , 1997 .

[4]  R Siebers,et al.  Data inconsistencies in abstracts of articles in Clinical chemistry. , 2001, Clinical chemistry.

[5]  James Hartley,et al.  Style and Substance in Psychology , 2002, Social studies of science.

[6]  James Hartley,et al.  Typographic Settings for Structured Abstracts , 2000 .

[7]  Péter Jacsó,et al.  Quality of abstracts , 1993 .

[8]  J Froom,et al.  Deficiencies in structured medical abstracts. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  T R Einarson,et al.  Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. , 1994, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[10]  James Hartley.  Do structured abstracts take more space? And does it matter? , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[11]  T. Einarson,et al.  Quality Assessment of Pharmacoeconomic Abstracts of Original Research Articles in Selected Journals , 1997, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[12]  J Hartley.  Applying ergonomics to Applied Ergonomics: using structured abstracts. , 1999, Applied ergonomics.

[13]  Steven Orla Kimbrough,et al.  Exemplary documents: a foundation for information retrieval design , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..

[14]  M. Gardner,et al.  More informative abstracts revisited. , 1990, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[15]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Research profiling: Improving the literature review , 2002, Scientometrics.

[16]  R. Brian Haynes.  Dissent more informative Abstracts: Current status and evaluation , 1993 .

[17]  K Ottenbacher.  Quantitative reviewing: the literature review as scientific inquiry. , 1983, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[18]  James Hartley.  Are structured abstracts more or less accurate than traditional ones? A study in the psychological literature , 2000, J. Inf. Sci..

[19]  R. Flesch.  A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  A. J. O'Rourke.  Structured abstracts in information retrieval from biomedical databases: a literature survey , 1997 .

[21]  R M Pitkin,et al.  Can the accuracy of abstracts be improved by providing specific instructions? A randomized controlled trial. , 1998, JAMA.

[22]  R B Haynes.  More informative abstracts: current status and evaluation. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Effects of peer review and editing on the readability of articles published in Annals of Internal Medicine. , 1994, JAMA.

[24]  D C McCrory,et al.  Getting Meaningful Informed Consent from Older Adults: A Structured Literature Review of Empirical Research , 1998, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[25]  Carol Berkenkotter,et al.  Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication , 1994 .

[26]  B L Humphreys,et al.  Structured abstracts in MEDLINE, 1989-1991. , 1995, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[27]  George R. Klare,et al.  The measurement of readability , 1963 .

[28]  James Hartley,et al.  Obtaining information accurately and quickly: are structured abstracts more efficient? , 1996, J. Inf. Sci..

[29]  Keith B. Riggle.  Using the Active and Passive Voice Appropriately in On-the-Job Writing , 1998 .

[30]  S B Thacker,et al.  A proposal for more informative abstracts of review articles. , 1988, Annals of internal medicine.

[31]  James Hartley,et al.  An Evaluation of Structured Abstracts in Journals Published by the British Psychological Society , 1998 .

[32]  Gunnar Sedin,et al.  Structure improves content and peer review of abstracts submitted to scientific meetings , 1999 .

[33]  N L Wilczynski,et al.  Preliminary assessment of the effect of more informative (structured) abstracts on citation retrieval from MEDLINE. , 1995, Medinfo. MEDINFO.

[34]  David Goldman.  Medical Writings: A New Section for Annals , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[35]  Udo Kruschwitz.  AAAI Spring Symposium 2002 , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[36]  Diane Belcher,et al.  Academic writing for graduate students: A course for nonnative speakers of English. 253pp. Academic writing for graduate students: Commentary John M. Swales & Christine B. Feak. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1994, 117 pp , 1995 .

[37]  R Rawles,et al.  Proceedings of the British Psychological Society , 2003 .

[38]  James Hartley.  From Structured Abstracts to Structured Articles: A Modest Proposal , 1999 .

[39]  J. Hartley,et al.  Are Structured Abstracts Easier to Read Than Traditional Ones , 1997 .

[40]  James Hartley,et al.  Three ways to improve the clarity of journal abstracts , 1994 .

[41]  Jack Froom,et al.  Presentation Deficiencies in structured medical abstracts , 1993 .

[42]  Gerald T. Kowitz,et al.  Abstract readability as a factor in information systems , 1975, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[43]  Mercer Jennifer Ann,et al.  PUBLICATION manual of the American Psychological Association. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  R M Pitkin,et al.  Accuracy of data in abstracts of published research articles. , 1999, JAMA.