Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise

Abstract Objective: Using a dual task paradigm, two experiments were conducted to: (1) quantify the listening effort that young and older adults expend to recognize speech in noise when presented under audio-only (Experiment 1) and audiovisual conditions (Experiment 2) and, (2) determine the influence visual cues have on listening effort. Listening effort refers to the attentional and cognitive resources required to understand speech. Design: All participants performed a closed-set word recognition task and tactile pattern recognition task separately and concurrently. Accuracy and reaction time data were collected. The criterion for single task word recognition performance was set to 80% correct across experiments and across age groups. Study sample: For each experiment, 25 young and 25 older adults with normal hearing and normal (or corrected normal) vision participated. Results: Under equated performance conditions, older adults expended more listening effort than young adults with both audio-only and audiovisually presented speech. Furthermore, the processing demands of audiovisual speech recognition were greater than audio-only speech recognition for all participants. Conclusions: These results suggest that while visual cues can improve audiovisual speech recognition, they can also place an extra demand on processing resources with performance consequences for the word and tactile tasks under dual task conditions. Sumario Objetivo: Utilizando un paradigma de doble tarea, se realizaron dos experimentos: 1) cuantificar el esfuerzo que hace los adultos jóvenes y mayores para reconocer el lenguaje en ruido ciando se presenta solo en audio (experimento 1) y en condición audio-visual (experimento 2) y 2) determinar la influencia de las claves visuales en el esfuerzo por comprender. El esfuerzo comprensivo se refiere a los recursos cognitivos y de atención requeridos para comprender el lenguaje. Diseño: Todos los participantes realizaron una tarea de reconocimiento de palabras en contexto cerrado y una tarea de reconocimiento táctil separada y concomitantemente. Se colectaron los datos sobre la precisión y el tiempo de reacción. El criterio para el desempeñ en la prueba de tarea única de reconocimiento de palabras se fijó en 80% de aciertos a través de experimentos y a través de grupos etáreos. Muestra: Para cada experimento, participaron 25 adultos jóvenes y 25 adultos viejos con audición normal y visión normal (o normal corregida). Resultados: En condiciones equitativas de desempeño, los adultos mayores efectuaron mayor esfuerzo que los adultos jóvenes en ambas condiciones de presentación del discurso: sólo audio y audiovisual. Incluso la demanda audiovisual de procesamiento del discurso fue mayor que la auditiva en todos los participantes. Conclusiones: Estos resultados sugieren que mientras las claves visuales pueden mejorar el reconocimiento audiovisual del lenguaje, también demandan un esfuerzo extra en el procesamiento de recursos, con las consecuencias en el desempeño de las tareas táctiles y de palabras en la condición dual.

[1]  B E Walden,et al.  Benefit from visual cues in auditory-visual speech recognition by middle-aged and elderly persons. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  Jennifer J. Lister,et al.  The aging auditory system: anatomic and physiologic changes and implications for rehabilitation , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[3]  John Fletcher,et al.  Speech Understanding and Aging , 1977 .

[4]  Patrick Rabbitt Recognition: Memory for words correctly heard in noise , 1966 .

[5]  The effects of age upon the visual perception of speech. , 1979, Scandinavian audiology.

[6]  Jean-Pierre Gagné,et al.  Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise. , 2011, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[7]  L. Braida,et al.  Evaluating the articulation index for auditory-visual input. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Candace Bourland Hick,et al.  Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[9]  J. F. Feuerstein,et al.  Monaural versus binaural hearing: ease of listening, word recognition, and attentional effort. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[10]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Spoken Language Comprehension in Older Adults: Interactions between Sensory and Cognitive Change in Normal Aging , 2001 .

[11]  Salvador Soto-Faraco,et al.  Attention to touch weakens audiovisual speech integration , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  J. Cummings,et al.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[13]  Pamela Ebert Flattau,et al.  COMMITTEE ON VISION , 1991 .

[14]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Cognitive supports and cognitive constraints on comprehension of spoken language. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[15]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Divided attention abilities in young and old adults. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Gurjit Singh,et al.  Effects of Age on Auditory and Cognitive Processing: Implications for Hearing Aid Fitting and Audiologic Rehabilitation , 2006, Trends in amplification.

[18]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional costs of effortful listening. , 2009, Psychology and aging.

[19]  J. Deutsch Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[20]  D. Downs Effects of hearing and use on speech discrimination and listening effort. , 1982, Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders.

[21]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[22]  A. Fort,et al.  Bimodal speech: early suppressive visual effects in human auditory cortex , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  W Melnick,et al.  American National Standard specifications for audiometers. , 1971, ASHA.

[24]  Jean-Pierre Gagné,et al.  Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: the effects of providing visual speech cues. , 2010, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[25]  W. H. Sumby,et al.  Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise , 1954 .

[26]  D W Downs,et al.  Processing demands during auditory learning under degraded listening conditions. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[27]  P. Baltes,et al.  Sensory functioning and intelligence in old age: a strong connection. , 1994, Psychology and aging.

[28]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Hearing Loss and Perceptual Effort: Downstream Effects on Older Adults’ Memory for Speech , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[29]  R. Campbell,et al.  Audiovisual Integration of Speech Falters under High Attention Demands , 2005, Current Biology.

[30]  N. Kraus,et al.  Audiovisual Deficits in Older Adults with Hearing Loss: Biological Evidence , 2009, Ear and hearing.

[31]  T. Salthouse Resource-reduction interpretations of cognitive aging☆ , 1988 .

[32]  Charles T Scialfa,et al.  The role of sensory factors in cognitive aging research. , 2002, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[33]  P F Seitz,et al.  Assessing the Cognitive Demands of Speech Listening for People with Hearing Losses , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[34]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  W. H. Sumby,et al.  Erratum: Visual Contribution to Speech Intelligibility in Noise [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 26, 212 (1954)] , 1954 .

[36]  P. Baltes,et al.  Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: a new window to the study of cognitive aging? , 1997, Psychology and aging.

[37]  Dawna Lewis,et al.  Attentional modulation of word recognition by children in a dual-task paradigm. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[38]  A. Macleod,et al.  A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. , 1990, British journal of audiology.

[39]  Louis D. Braida,et al.  Evaluating the articulation index for auditory-visual input. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  P. Kricos,et al.  Audiologic Management of Older Adults With Hearing Loss and Compromised Cognitive/Psychoacoustic Auditory Processing Capabilities , 2006, Trends in amplification.

[41]  K. Grant,et al.  Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  M. Sommers,et al.  Auditory-Visual Speech Perception and Auditory-Visual Enhancement in Normal-Hearing Younger and Older Adults , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[43]  A. Macleod,et al.  Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise. , 1987, British journal of audiology.