Classification in Non-Metric Spaces

A key question in vision is how to represent our knowledge of previously encountered objects to classify new ones. The answer depends on how we determine the similarity of two objects. Similarity tells us how relevant each previously seen object is in determining the category to which a new object belongs. Here a dichotomy emerges. Complex notions of similarity appear necessary for cognitive models and applications, while simple notions of similarity form a tractable basis for current computational approaches to classification. We explore the nature of this dichotomy and why it calls for new approaches to well-studied problems in learning. We begin this process by demonstrating new computational methods for supervised learning that can handle complex notions of similarity. (1) We discuss how to implement parametric methods that represent a class by its mean when using non-metric similarity functions; and (2) We review non-parametric methods that we have developed using nearest neighbor classification in non-metric spaces. Point (2), and some of the background of our work have been described in more detail in [8].

[1]  E. Rosch Cognitive reference points , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[3]  Linda G. Shapiro,et al.  Computer and Robot Vision , 1991 .

[4]  Belur V. Dasarathy,et al.  Minimal consistent set (MCS) identification for optimal nearest neighbor decision systems design , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[5]  C. G. Hilborn,et al.  The Condensed Nearest Neighbor Rule , 1967 .

[6]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  The condensed nearest neighbor rule (Corresp.) , 1968, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  Daphna Weinshall,et al.  Condensing image databases when retrieval is based on non-metric distances , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[8]  Ingemar J. Cox,et al.  PicHunter: Bayesian relevance feedback for image retrieval , 1996, Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[9]  I. Tomek,et al.  Two Modifications of CNN , 1976 .

[10]  Emanuele Trucco,et al.  Computer and Robot Vision , 1995 .

[11]  Jon Louis Bentley,et al.  An Algorithm for Finding Best Matches in Logarithmic Expected Time , 1977, TOMS.