Do firms benefit from being present in technology clusters? The case of biotechnology

[1]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[2]  M. V. Geenhuizen,et al.  Does a clustered location matter for high-technology companies' performance? The case of biotechnology in the Netherlands , 2007 .

[3]  E. Hippel Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[4]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Real Effects of Academic Research: Comment , 1992 .

[5]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  MULTINATIONAL FIRMS AND KNOWLEDGE DIFFUSION: EVIDENCE USING PATENT CITATION DATA , 2004 .

[6]  M. Porter Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[7]  Z. Ács,et al.  Regional Innovation, Knowledge and Global Change , 2001 .

[8]  Juan Alcácer,et al.  Location Strategies and Knowledge Spillovers , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Fredrick Flyer,et al.  Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States , 2000 .

[10]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  The Geographic Sources of Innovation: Technological Infrastructure and Product Innovation in the United States , 1994 .

[11]  K. Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[12]  R. Pouder,et al.  Hot Spots and Blind Spots: Geographical Clusters of Firms and Innovation , 1996 .

[13]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[14]  J. García‐Quevedo,et al.  Effects of university research on the geography of innovation , 2005 .

[15]  David L. Deeds,et al.  The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry , 1999 .

[16]  Corinne Autant-Bernard,et al.  Science and knowledge flows: evidence from the French case , 2001 .

[17]  Juan Alcácer,et al.  Knowledge Seeking and Location Choice of Foreign Direct Investment in the United States , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[18]  L. Anselin,et al.  Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge , 2002 .

[19]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[20]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[21]  P. Swann,et al.  A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology , 1996 .

[22]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  Commuters and the regional assignment of innovative activities: A methodological patent study of German districts , 2005 .

[23]  A. Jaffe Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[24]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Academic Knowledge Transfers and the Concentration of Economic Activity , 2000 .

[25]  Enrico Santarelli,et al.  Patents and the Geographic Localization of R&D Spillovers in French Manufacturing , 2001 .

[26]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations , 1997 .

[27]  Don E. Kash,et al.  The Complexity Challenge: Technological Innovation for the 21st Century , 1999 .

[28]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? , 2003 .

[29]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .

[30]  P. Romer Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  Hariolf Grupp,et al.  Interdependencies between the science and technology infrastructure and innovation activities in German regions: empirical findings and policy consequences , 1999 .

[32]  K. Head,et al.  Agglomeration Benefits and Location Choice: Evidence from Japanese Manufacturing Investment in the United States , 1994 .

[33]  Joanne M. Hill,et al.  The Effect of Location on the Performance of High Technology Firms , 1984 .

[34]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  External Sources of Innovative Capabilities: The Preferences for Strategic Alliances or Mergers and Acquisitions , 2002 .

[35]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[36]  F. Narin,et al.  Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength , 1987 .

[37]  A. Arundel,et al.  What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms , 1998 .

[38]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[39]  A. Marshall,et al.  Principles of Economics , 1891 .

[40]  Bjørn L. Basberg,et al.  Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature☆ , 1987 .

[41]  S. Breschi,et al.  Are firms in clusters really more innovative? , 2003 .

[42]  J. Cantwell,et al.  Recent Location of Foreign-owned Research and Development Activities by Large Multinational Corporations in the European Regions: The Role of Spillovers and Externalities , 2005 .