Bioactivity landscape modeling: chemoinformatic characterization of structure-activity relationships of compounds tested across multiple targets.

Characterizing structure-activity relationships (SAR) of sets of compounds screened across different targets is crucial in several drug discovery endeavors. To this end, chemoinformatic approaches are emerging to characterize SARs using the concept of multi-target activity landscapes. Herein, we present the Structure multiple Activity Similarity (SmAS) maps and the Structure multiple Activity Landscape Index (SmALI) as general approaches to navigate through and quantify the most informative regions of multi-target activity landscapes. These methods are extensions of SAS maps and SALI metric used for single targets. To illustrate the use of these methods, SmAS maps and SmALI values were employed for characterizing the SAR of three benchmark sets of compounds screened with different target families. As a follow up of our work, we employed four 2D and 3D structure representations to obtain consensus models for each data set. For the three data sets, we identified pairs of compounds with high structure similarity but very different bioactivity profile across the corresponding targets of each family that is, multi-target activity cliffs. Also, we identified pairs of compounds with low structure similarity but similar bioactivity profile across the different targets that is, multi-target scaffold hops. The consensus SmAS maps and mean SmALI metric are complementary chemoinformatic tools to systematically describe multi-target activity landscapes.

[1]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Activity landscape representations for structure-activity relationship analysis. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[2]  Anne Mai Wassermann,et al.  Computational Analysis of Multi‐target Structure–Activity Relationships to Derive Preference Orders for Chemical Modifications toward Target Selectivity , 2010, ChemMedChem.

[3]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Representation of Multi‐Target Activity Landscapes Through Target Pair‐Based Compound Encoding in Self‐Organizing Maps , 2011, Chemical biology & drug design.

[4]  José L. Medina-Franco,et al.  Scaffold Diversity Analysis of Compound Data Sets Using an Entropy-Based Measure , 2009 .

[5]  T Scior,et al.  How to recognize and workaround pitfalls in QSAR studies: a critical review. , 2009, Current medicinal chemistry.

[6]  José L. Medina-Franco,et al.  Visualization of the Chemical Space in Drug Discovery , 2008 .

[7]  José L. Medina-Franco,et al.  Visualization of Molecular Fingerprints , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[8]  P. Jaccard,et al.  Etude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura , 1901 .

[9]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  From Structure–Activity to Structure–Selectivity Relationships: Quantitative Assessment, Selectivity Cliffs, and Key Compounds , 2009, ChemMedChem.

[10]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Large-Scale Systematic Analysis of 2D Fingerprint Methods and Parameters to Improve Virtual Screening Enrichments , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[11]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Structure-activity relationship anatomy by network-like similarity graphs and local structure-activity relationship indices. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[12]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Molecular similarity analysis uncovers heterogeneous structure-activity relationships and variable activity landscapes. , 2007, Chemistry & biology.

[13]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Data structures and computational tools for the extraction of SAR information from large compound sets. , 2010, Drug discovery today.

[14]  José L. Medina-Franco,et al.  Characterization of Activity Landscapes Using 2D and 3D Similarity Methods: Consensus Activity Cliffs , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[15]  Austin B. Yongye,et al.  Multitarget Structure-Activity Relationships Characterized by Activity-Difference Maps and Consensus Similarity Measure , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[16]  Peter Willett,et al.  Combination Rules for Group Fusion in Similarity‐Based Virtual Screening , 2010, Molecular informatics.

[17]  Peter Willett,et al.  Similarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints. , 2006, Drug discovery today.

[18]  Jaime Pérez-Villanueva,et al.  Towards a systematic characterization of the antiprotozoal activity landscape of benzimidazole derivatives. , 2010, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[19]  Rajarshi Guha,et al.  Assessing How Well a Modeling Protocol Captures a Structure-Activity Landscape , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[20]  Mathias Wawer,et al.  Navigating structure-activity landscapes. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[21]  José L. Medina-Franco,et al.  Benzotriazoles and Indazoles Are Scaffolds with Biological Activity against Entamoeba histolytica , 2011, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[22]  José L. Medina-Franco,et al.  Consensus Models of Activity Landscapes with Multiple Chemical, Conformer, and Property Representations , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[23]  Gerald M. Maggiora,et al.  On Outliers and Activity Cliffs-Why QSAR Often Disappoints , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[24]  J. Bajorath,et al.  SAR index: quantifying the nature of structure-activity relationships. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[25]  Schmid,et al.  "Scaffold-Hopping" by Topological Pharmacophore Search: A Contribution to Virtual Screening. , 1999, Angewandte Chemie.

[26]  Nathan Brown,et al.  On scaffolds and hopping in medicinal chemistry. , 2006, Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry.

[27]  Rajarshi Guha,et al.  Structure-Activity Landscape Index: Identifying and Quantifying Activity Cliffs , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[28]  José L. Medina-Franco,et al.  Structure–activity relationships of benzimidazole derivatives as antiparasitic agents: Dual activity-difference (DAD) maps , 2011 .

[29]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Comparison of two- and three-dimensional activity landscape representations for different compound data sets , 2011 .

[30]  David Rogers,et al.  Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[31]  Anne Mai Wassermann,et al.  Design of Multitarget Activity Landscapes That Capture Hierarchical Activity Cliff Distributions , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[32]  Clemencia Pinilla,et al.  A Similarity‐based Data‐fusion Approach to the Visual Characterization and Comparison of Compound Databases , 2007, Chemical biology & drug design.